The new names of Capitol Hill

By jseattle
(3 votes) (report abuse)
On CHS, we are dedicated to place. We focus our conversation on one part of one city. And we give parts of that one part names to help organize the conversation.

You can see the CHS neighborhood names we started with at the top of every page and on this map.

We've had a few discussions about updating these labels to better organize what we're writing about and better describe the areas of the Hill. Here's one thread. Here's another.

Some of the issues raised about the current names:
  • Institution Belt is kinda mean
  • St. Marks is a better name for An Historic District
  • I-5 Shores is brilliant and has to stay
  • We need sub-names like Radio Point

Final Answer and jonglix created the map attached to this post to present a potential new organization. It solves many of the issues raised without losing the fun of the original name set.

The only issue I see is the confusion of splitting the parks across different 'hoods. If I'm writing about nudist jugglers in Volunteer Park, does it get filed under Hilltop North or St. Marks?

So, I propose ratifying the attached map as the new CHS neighborhood map with two modifications:
1) Volunteer Park's entirety is included in Hilltop North (don't get all uppity, St. Marks -- another option is to add you to Hilltop, too)
2) Cal Anderson/Bobby Morris entirety is included in Broadway.

And I put to the floor a critically important question --
A) Is Cafe Presse's stretch of 12th Ave Capitol Hill?
Permalink
tags: maps
posted on Tue, Jun 10, 2008 11:08 AM
CommentsRSS Feed
Want to leave a comment? Log In to your account
Cafe Presse byWesa5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Can we add a "South Madison Annex" to include that little stretch of unique and tasty places? Maybe from Madison to Cherry or Marion?
RE: Cafe Presse byWestDenny5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
South Madison Annex? Thats CD Turf!
RE: Cafe Presse byWestDenny5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
Edit - I guess its fair to include that strip of restaurants on 12th as a logical extension. Somehow, whenever I read south of Madison I jump to conclusions.
An even newer version byjonglix5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
I incorporated some more suggestions here:
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=1038,-122.31534&spn=0.048245,0.084372&z=14
RE: An even newer version byAndrew Taylor5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
Miller Park description: Historically part of Capitol Hill but officially in Madison-Miller Urban Village .Single family, some apartments, small commercial strip on 19th.
Suggested additions: Many new townhomes between John & Madison, several large multifamily neighborhood commercial developments built and planned along Madison.
Capitol Hill Community Council Boundary Commission byAndrew Taylor5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
The Capitol Hill Community Council boundaries, which we were thinking of during the recent elections, are: "The Boundaries of the CHCC shall be I-5 (west), Pike/Madison (south), 24th Ave. (east) and SR 520/Interlaken (north)."

Thoughts:
a) equate map boundaries with CHCC boundaries
b) color the white bit south of 520 and west of 24th and call it Montlake. I suspect Montlakers will do their own thing, but it's free to be inclusive.
c) consider sharing the Pike-Pine area: a couple of people turned up at the election, realized they lived south of the CHCC Pike Street boundary, and (with commendable honesty) upped and left!

In general hard fixed line boundaries are problems. Can we have fuzzy gradations of color separating the different areas (I suspect that, like text on maps, is beyond Google Maps)?

Respectfully,
Andrew
RE: Capitol Hill Community Council Boundary Commission byjonglix5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
If the boundary is Interlaken then that pretty much excludes Montlake
RE: Capitol Hill Community Council Boundary Commission byWesa5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
I concur with Andrew.
I'll Miss Fancy Pants byBubbles5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
I thought calling the 15th/Volunteer Park area "Fancy Pants" was just brilliant. I'll miss that name. Otherwise, I like the new naming conventions.
RE: I'll Miss Fancy Pants byjseattle5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
I kind of miss Fancy Pants, too. I'll probably continue to use it because it makes me laugh.
I rise in defense of Cafe Presse byUncle Vinny5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Brothers and sisters! I urge you to open your arms to the good people of Cafe Presse and Stumptown... let us clasp them to our Capitol Hilly bosom, make them our own, and prevent the scheming neighborhoods to the South from snatching away yon delicious Frenchy snacks.
RE: I rise in defense of Cafe Presse byWesa5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
I like you.
drawing the line byjonglix5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
I'm happy to go with the CHCC boundaries if others agree. Although I do think Montlake is a stretch. Fuzzy boundaries are sorta possible...I can try that too

Also not sure what, if anything, should be in the descriptions.
RE: drawing the line byAndrew Taylor5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
My mistake, Jonglix correct. CHCC bylaws do say: "SR 520/Interlaken (north)."
They also refer to a map that nobody has seen recently but which _may_ be in Ann Donovan's basement!
RE: drawing the line byBubbles5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
I'm a Montlaker, and our southern boundary is E. Interlaken Blvd according to the Montlake Community Club. Our western boundary is 16th Ave E. Hope that helps with the boundary drawing.
Hard lines are ok byjseattle5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Fuzzy will happen. We should draw lines.

This is not the CHCC.

The latest map jonglix links to is good even with the sub-Madison annexations. Though I will ask to cut Seneca Slope. Also, the descriptions detract from the art of it all. No need to explain!

I like the Cafe Presse discussion. Please continue.
RE: Hard lines are ok byjonglix5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
OK, I'll cut Seneca Slope and Squire Park unless some readers chime in from there. I'll keep Radio Point and extend Pike/Pine south to include Cafe Presse, by popular demand. Might keep "fancy pants" in parentheses for sentimental reasons.
Final and I can make up a nice new map without descriptions
first hill v. cap hill bybridget5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
sorry dudes but cafe presse is on first hill, as is the SU campus i know and love.

-BUT-

why not just have "first hill" (or to be cute, the ever so lame "pill hill") be added to the map? it is close enough to the pike pine corridor and to cal anderson that people from first hill probably interact with capitol hill EVERY DAY
Radio Point as a name: how about Tower Triangle byAndrew Taylor5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
At the risk of extreme geeky pedantism. However, learning/fussing about the towers was how I got into the addictive world of neighborhood activism.

I presume "radio point" refers to the large "radio" towers on Madison. Actually only one of them (KCTS) has radio stations on it (KUOW, KEXP). The other two are principally TV towers.

So, rather than "radio point" how about "Tower Triangle" as a name?

(BTW the area in question is part of the [rather dormant] Central Neighborhood Association area.)

Geekily yours,
Andrew
Southern egde byjonglix5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
the remaining debate mainly concerns the South of Madison area.

I've heard many suggestions for naming the area around the "radio" towers. Does anyone want to second any of them (Radio Point, Tower Triangle, Mad Cap,Union Triangle) ?

Where to drawn the southern boundary of Pike/Pine: Most are willing to go as far as Union, others might want to stretch it to Spring to include Presse. I think a jog south to Spring is justifiable but don't want to go any farther into First Hill / Seattle U.
also, the map needs to be bigger. byjosh5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Presse, Lark, Licorous, et c. are all in the spiritual appendix of Pike/Pine. It needs its own tiny spot on the map just for the sake of humor.

Also: Save "Fancy Pants" and "Little Hill". Merging parts of "Institution Belt" into the other hoods might be nicer, but let's not sacrifice accuracy for the sake of politeness.
parks & rec byjosh5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
maybe the parks shouldn't be part of any sub-neighborhood? Maybe Institution Belt should be named in relation to the park instead?
RE: parks & rec byWesa5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
I wouldn't mind if Institution Belt was renamed Cal Anderson something or other.
Sorry, but . . . byJames5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Radio Point is not part of Capitol Hill. Great name, though, regardless of its inaccuracy. Similarly, Cafe Presse and all other points on 12th south of Madison aren't on the hill either. A spiritual appendix, sure, deserving of its own name and an occasional mention on a Cap Hill blog, but not part of it.
RE: Sorry, but . . . byjseattle5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
We're going to add some of the border states because people will undoubtedly write about the areas here and I want a good filing system. This is all about order, James! Without order, anarchy.
Ok, fine, I-5 shores can stay. byw7ngman5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
... but at least give Olive/Denny it's own hood. Are we really going to say that The Elite is I-5 shores and Clever Dunnes is Pike/Pine?
RE: Ok, fine, I-5 shores can stay. byjseattle5 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
How about this?
OLIVE: Carve off BROADWAY below Harvard between Olive Way and Olive St. Carve off PIKE/PINE above Pine. Carve off I-5 SHORES below Olive Way.
RE: Ok, fine, I-5 shores can stay. byjonglix5 months ago