LATEST CHS POSTS
The Pacific Northwest's
#1 neighborhood news site
Got a tip? E-mail CHS
chs@capitolhillseattle.com
Call or text (206) 399-5959
Or message @jseattle on Twitter
Not a Member?
Sign Up
posted
01/23/10 03:23 PM
|
updated
01/23/10 03:26 PM
Time to vote, again: Seattle school levies on special ballot
By
jseattle
|
|
|
Just a heads up.
|
|
| For cost cutting reasons King County Elections has closed all but 2 ballot drop off locations. The only remaining ones are at their temporary headquarters at 9010 E Marginal Way South in Tukwilla, or the King County Administration Building on 4th Ave. These closures are not just for the smaller spring elections, but will continue for this fall's primary and general elections. | |
|
Comment by
Blank Tom
7 months ago
|
(
+2
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
Off topic
|
|
| No one has yet mentioned the "For Lease" sign in Tilden's window. Hope it's a local business that goes in. Please not another bar or cafe. | |
|
Comment by
offtopicdude
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
... vote yes
|
|
|
How can we expect the society we all desire without good functioning free public schools? Money is one of the keys to the goal of better schools. I feel very strongly about quality schools. Seattle has a ways to go, but, the money is needed to operate despite other problems to solve. Please vote and vote - YES. (mail back ballots are so simple) Mike |
|
|
Comment by
Mike with curls
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
RE: ... vote yes
|
|
| Or no, if you believe that the governor and legislature should obey the state constitution's direction to amply fund public education. | |
|
Comment by
ed
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
|
|
RE: ... vote no ....ah, my nose
|
|
|
Sure, vote no, if you want to cut off your nose to spite your face. Full school funding from the legislature for the richest city in the state is a pipe dream. Would be nice, not likely any time soon. |
|
|
Comment by
Mike with curls
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
|
|
Why you should vote no on Prop 1- BTA levy
|
|
|
Yes, I know, how can a Seattle schools parent say no to a school levy? When it's using a garden hose to put out a forest fire, that's how. I'm a long-time activist in our district and I write for the Seattle education blog, Save Seattle Schools (saveseattleschools.blogspot.com). I ask you to consider the following: - the district has a $500M backlog in maintenance. This is neither normal nor good for any district. We got here because our district has continued (for at least 15+ years) to cut the basic maintenance budget and defer maintenance. The outcome of that is easy to see; you, the taxpayer, get to pay more for repairs that would have cost less if done sooner. - the head of Maintenance, Mark Pflueger, told a Board committee that he does NO maintenance "all I do is put out fires". His budget is a little more than half of what the district spent in 1979. - we cannot "levy" our way out of the backlog. This levy will hit maybe 10-15% and our next BEX (remodeling/renovation) is 3 years off and neither of them can be done fast enough to really help - the $270M budget gets eaten up fast by technology issues, athletic fields, 5 reopening schools (that's $50M right there). There is not much left for schools that have been waiting for maintenance. -John Stanford, in 1995, wanted a maintenance levy OVER a technology levy because the maintenance backlog was at $185M. If John Stanford was worried about the backlog at $185M in 1995, why isn't our district when it's at almost $50 show more 0M in 2010? My prediction is it will pass BUT they will come to taxpayers in a few short years with a FOURTH levy to attack the backlog. Is it fair to our friends and neighbors who don't have children in the system or don't have children at all, to pay more because our district doesn't take care of the facilities that taxpayers invest in? I don't think so. |
|
|
Comment by
Melissa Westbrook
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
... and your logic is?
|
|
|
Starved for money the district has postponed needed maintance for years. So, starve the school district by voting less money, make it worse off $$$$ wise, and that solves some sort of money problem? I guess I missed the good outcome. Start a reform school finances movement, a real one. I will join. In the mean, I VOTE YES for money for schools. Then, go for reform. |
|
|
Comment by
Mike with curls
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
|
|
... pulblic schools have nothing to do with having children
|
|
|
The massive benefit to society for having free public education is the reason to support public school funding. We live in a society where skills generate good jobs, better citizens and less violence, and on and on. It is not an issue of who had kids and how many. It is the obligation of society acting as a committee of the whole to provide this funding to enrich all our lives at thousands of collective intersections.... including democracy itself. (the larger sense of intercourse could have been worked in here, but, I am getting tired ... good old phrasing) |
|
|
Comment by
Mike with curls
7 months ago
|
(
+1
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
|
|
Not Buying "For the Kids"
|
|
| i love SPS students. can't stand its central administration. wake up people. the staff wastes money everywhere and i do mean everywhere on pursuit of internal politics and fiefdoms. vote down the BTA. make them put it back on the ballot with assurances that they will spend the monexy not just on maintenance but on a list of projects that doesn't get swapped out depending on the whims of the most powerful staff person at a particular moment. (oh, and pass it the second time around). | |
|
Comment by
Skeptic
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
RE: Not Buying "For the Kids"
|
|
|
This article speaks for itself. Remember how they went after Olchefske when he was on to them. Bill and Melinda withdrew funding because of the districts poor accounting practices. How about an oversight committee consisting of two citizens from each SPS? Transparency and accountability is what is missing from these levies. http://www.seattleweekly.com/1999-09-15/news/the-olchefske-f |
|
|
Comment by
Jane Doe
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
|
|
Are you kidding?
|
|
| You really propose that to teach the district a lesson we should vote no on TWO levies that support technology, building maintenance and student programs? You should be ashamed of yourself. While I absolutely agree that money is wasted by the district, to allow the current generation of public school students to suffer because of this is absurd and harmful. If you want to change the way the district operates why don't you start some grassroots effort that parents, students, and communinty members can understand and back. I for one, would be happy to hear your solutions. Because if you just want to sit around and complain about the district you're really part of the problem and not the solution. I will be voiting yes. You should really reconsider your position on the real issues at hand. | |
|
Comment by
Vanessa
7 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
Money won't fix Seattle Public Schools
|
|
| We all like to think that it is our responsibility to vote for school levies, but if you look at the numbers, it quickly becomes clear that the problem with Seattle schools isn't money. The general fund expenses per student in Seattle is more than $12,000 per year. That figure is well above the $9,050 to $10,300 spent per student in neighboring Edmonds, Northshore, Bellevue, Mercer Island, Renton and Everett. The operations levy funds 23% of Seattle public schools; about the same amount that we in Seattle are paying above our neighboring districts. Perhaps the SPS superintendent should ask these neighboring school districts how they are able to provide a much better education for so much less money. I'm voting no, and I my nose will stay firmly attached to my face much like the quality of education in Seattle will not be harmed by a smaller budget. | |
|
Comment by
John
6 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
Most Recent Classifieds
-
Dark brown leather ikea POÄNG chair with matching ottoman
Dark brown leather ikea POÄNG chair with matching ottoman: http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/...
-
REDUCED!! Matching SET of wood dressers; mid-century style, $120 each
Fantastic condition real wood dressers. They match and dimensions are: 36"wide, 20"deep, 38" tall. 4...
-
Reduced! Wood Table and SIX chairs; $175
Great condition solid wood table & chairs. Pine wood. Comes with six chairs and cushions!