Capitol Hill Community Council | Reclaiming Power (and creating a Pike/Pine pedestrian zone)

Zachary Pullin, Vice President of the Capitol Hill Community Council, contributes to CHS about community civics and politics on a monthly basis.

Each week, my partner and I have my sister over for dinner. Before she leaves for the drive home, I remind her to be safe, walk with awareness, and text me immediately when she’s home. She’s a smart woman and I have faith she’d fight against violence. So, I was shocked at my becoming numb that foggy, winter morning when someone stole my power.

I did not plan to tell anyone about the sexual assault he inflicted on me three months ago. I self-prescribed a daily treatment of denial and suppression nurtured by a tenacious abundance of sadness, shame, and frustration. Violence and oppression separate us from our self, our bodies, and our communities.

I became a refugee from my own body.

Just three weeks after the assault, a mentor asked me if I sought power, if people like me should want power. I shuddered because, to me, power had become a swear word.  “Power” – much like the words “God,” “Love,” and “Progressive” — needs a reset to eliminate disparate, often conflicting, definitions that arise from deeply held beliefs about their meanings.

The Capitol Hill Community Council’s own history provides examples of power being used to actively lobby against a gay community center in the 1970s to prevent “perverts” and people of that “lifestyle” from ruining the neighborhood, or earlier neighborhood group iterations as active proponents of redlining. Negative illustrations and exercises of power in government, business, and social settings certainly repel me as it does so many progressive Seattleites.

“What would it take to create one of these in our city?”

But when we repel all power we often miss out on opportunity. Power has the potential to be used for the good of community and the marginalized, in service of others. Personal healing and community healing comes in many forms, but healing cannot occur in a silo because isolation is critical to abuse and loss of power.

The community of support I received after what I endured renewed my trust in the power of community and connectedness. Because I asked for help, I connected with The Northwest Network and immediately felt connected to community, authentic power, support, and hope. It reconstructed a trust in community and helped me transform pain into strength; when this happens on a larger scale, community brings people together to affect change for the betterment of everyone.

It came as no surprise, then, when my friend Ben shared photos of his trip to Europe. One photo in particular showed a wide brick road in Copenhagen, and is, in fact, a “pedestrianized decurbed street.” I asked him, “What would it take to create one of these in our city?” Ben answered back almost immediately, “Demanding it with enough people behind it.”

And it finally made sense. Many contemporary movements don’t have centralized power. If I was going to heal from my experience, I needed to center my power in my community. Often, people consider these movements leaderless or faceless, but they are not faceless. These movements reflect back at us our own face, our own story and struggles. We can see ourselves in these movements.

Imagine that we’re not cynical. Imagine that we retain hope in the face of growing inequity. Imagine that instead of an aversion to power — the type of power inflicted on the marginalized, vulnerable people — that we passionately pursue power. The power borne of people coming together and creating shared community.

In Seattle, the Women of Color for Systemic Change address critiques that the #BlackLivesMatter movement isn’t organized and has no clear leadership. The peaceful protests, unifying actions, and dialogues they’re organizing asserts their capacity, that leadership is clearly within each of us. Another organization, Got Green?, organized around priority hire for construction jobs in the city; and the Coalition for Inclusive Healthcare organized to win healthcare and insurance inclusive of trans* individuals.

If we continue building community, if we further seek a connection to our land, our history, and our neighbors then we can shape the change happening to us. If we continue building connectedness, we will avoid becoming refugees from our own community.

This month, the Capitol Hill Community Council [agenda] hosts an interactive community conversation about piloting temporary pedestrian streets on Pike/Pine. When enough people demand it and get behind these types of ideas, we can shape change. Join us Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM at the 12th Ave Arts (Pike/Pine room) to engage with neighbors, hear more about this idea, and get involved!

If you need support or someone to speak with about sexual assault or physical violence, contact NW Network at 206-568-7777. Special thanks to the support of my mentors and friends, Sara McCaslin and Jessica Trupin for helping with my column.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

9 thoughts on “Capitol Hill Community Council | Reclaiming Power (and creating a Pike/Pine pedestrian zone)

    • There’s no reason. But there’s no reason to look to Denmark, either, when there’s one not even a mile away.

      But while we’re at it, shouldn’t we look at how well it works here in Seattle before just jumping into something because we think it’s “great”?

  1. Why not pedestrianize all of Broadway from Pike to Roy permanently? Then it would start to approximate the experience of Strøget in Copenhagen.

    • How does that work in terms of busses and streetcar? Also what about people living on Broadway who want to get a cab home at night to be safe. If it can’t be crossed over west/east, that’s challenging. As far as bikes, are they allowed on these pedestrianized streets in a certain lane? I’d hope so and if not, they need to really think about bike greenways more that are parallel.

    • Well, here’s how it works (and it does actually work) in Copenhagen, as far as I remember (I never drove in the inner city, although I did drive around it). You are not supposed to bike in the pedestrian area, you are supposed to walk your bike, although at night when it is pretty empty, people do ride through. If someone lives on a pedestrianized street and needs to be dropped off by a taxi, they are dropped off at a corner where a regular street hits the pedestrian street. Delivery vehicles can come only the pedestrian street when necessary, but they drive very carefully. Emergency vehicles as well. No busses or streetcars. Basically, you can walk over a block to hit a regular street or get to a train station. I will admit that it seems harder for a person to get around in a wheelchair there (lots of older buildings without ramps, cobblestones, etc. in addition to pedestrianized areas), but the overall result is pretty darn good for the majority of people. I mean, you are also much less likely to be held up at gunpoint trying to walk from the cab at the corner to your middle-of-the-block apartment entry, so there’s that as well.

    • Oh, and I agree that bike greenways should be parallel and not the same as major pedestrian or car routes. And I get your point about crossing Broadway – maybe there could be a couple crossing points for cars.

  2. Zachary/Justin – I vaguely recall that there was a PDF report on the initial findings (which I somehow can’t find on the CHS website or on the Cap Hill EcoDistrict website).

    If I’m remembering this correctly, any chance you’d be open to sharing?

    Some of our neighbors are interested in investigating a Neighborhood Slow Zone around Cal Anderson Park, and I’m really interested in what they’re thinking for Pike/Pine.