Post navigation

Prev: (07/21/15) | Next: (07/22/15)

Design review: seven-story Crosby Capitol Hill on Bellevue, six (more) stories at 22/Madison

The future Crosby Capitol Hill (Images: B+H Architects)

The future Crosby Capitol Hill (Images: B+H Architects)

The recipe at Crosby Capitol Hill (Image: B+H Architects)

The recipe at Crosby Capitol Hill (Image: B+H Architects)

Now that we’ve solved downtown’s design issues, Capitol Hill can get back to making sure the buildings in its next waves of development are full of “community,” “connection,” and, as the developers of the Crosby Capitol Hill project on Bellevue Ave put it, “lifestyle.”

The Crosby and a six-story project planned for the *other* corner of 22nd and Madison will go in front of the East Design Review Board Wednesday night.

1517 Bellevue Ave
Land Use Application to allow a 7-story structure containing 45 residential units, 5 live/work units and 700 sq. ft. of retail space. Existing 2-story building is to be demolished. — View Design Proposal      

Review Meeting: July 22, 2015 8:00pm — Seattle University, 824 12th Ave, Admissions & Alumni Community Building
Review Phase: REC–Recommendation  See All Reviews
Project Number: 3018252  View Permit Status  |  View Land Use Notice
Planner: Beth Hartwick

The first item on the agenda for what should be the final review for the project at 1517 Bellevue Ave is a discussion of the project’s branding:Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 3.43.38 PMJust kidding. There’s nothing you can do about it other than accept and embrace.Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 4.11.35 PM

But you can weigh in on whether the form and finish of the seven-story, 50 market-rate unit project live up to this:

The architectural character of Crosby Capitol Hill is contemporary but takes its cues from the historic references of Auto Row. Brick, metal, and wood form the complementary material palette. Strongly expressed vertical columns create repeating bays with large industrial windows and a high storefront at the street facade. The signage of the project includes mounted steel lettering, some with backlighting and neon. Metal and glass canopies and an arbor define the building entrances. The ground floor has tall ceilings and a highly translucent storefront to reflect the industrial scale of the neighborhood. Continuing the more active streetscape from the new development to the North, the retail space stretches across the majority of the ground level street facade. Retail frontage is maximized by locating the residential entry off of a semi-public courtyard to the South side of the building.

Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 4.11.13 PM

The exterior material planned for the project

The Bellevue Ave project designed by B+H Architects will fill in another portion of the block set to be dominated by the massive preservation and development Excelsior project that gobbled up the old Bauhaus building and is turning it into a seven-story mixed-use fortress. The two-story Garden Studios apartment building currently standing (barely?) on Bellevue Ave next to the Excelsior construction is doomed and slated for demolition. In its place will soon rise seven stories plus a penthouse level and 50 apartment units plus 2,400 square feet of retail. There will be no parking. That’s OK. The Excelsior will have space for more than 170 vehicles in its gigantic underground parking structure.

The Crosby went through a mostly uneventful early design guidance session in December. But back then, nobody had seen the logo yet.

2100 E. Madison StScreen Shot 2015-07-21 at 3.59.47 PM
Design Review, Early Design Guidance for a 6-story, 50 unit apartment building with retail located at street level. Parking for 22 vehicles will be located below grade. Existing structure to be demolished — View Design Proposal  (12 MB)    

Review Meeting: July 22, 2015 6:30 pm, Seattle University, 824 12th Ave, Admissions & Alumni Community Building
Review Phase: EDG–Early Design Guidance
Project Number: 3020124  View Permit Status  |  View Land Use Notice
Planner: Magda Hogness

With the city reconsidering how it does design review, we might suggest planners take a look at 2100 E Madison. Developer Jim Mueller.held a meeting open to the community to discuss the design proposal last week in advance of Wednesday night’s session.

Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 3.59.29 PM

(Images: Weinstein A+U)

Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 3.59.37 PMWhat neighbors had a chance to hear and talk about in an informal format before the review is a planned six-story development set to eventually rise above a now empty tire shop and garage and join the belated development at 22nd and Madison. Across the street, on the southern corner of the 22nd/Madison intersection where the Twilight Exit once stood, another Mueller project is under construction just across the street from Safeway.

Here’s how Mueller and the architects at Weinstein A+U describe the new project on the northeast corner:

The proposed project will be a six-story, market rate apartment building approximately 65-feet in height and approximately 39,325-SF in area (above grade). A below grade parking accounts for an additional 8,400-SF in area. The building contains 50 residential apartment units, a resident lobby, exterior landscaped roof deck, balconies, and patios. There are three retail spaces, totalling approximately 3,800 SF. Two of the retail spaces can be combined to create a larger commercial space on East Madison Street. As the project is located in an urban village, parking is not required per SBC 23.54.015. However, 22 residential spaces are being designed for this building.

Mueller, who weathered the economic downturn and watched other development opportunities around Madison and the Central District fade, paid $1.8 million for the auto garage property last December. As development in the area digs in, big deals move forward, and plans for more are forged, this stretch of Madison, too, is again poised for change.

 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RWK
RWK
8 years ago

The Crosby looks like it could be a really nice building. I especially like the windows, which have kind of an old-fashioned look, and I’m also pleased to see they are using something other than corrugated steel for the exterior siding.

But why a “wiener dog” on the logo?

Jim98122x
Jim98122x
8 years ago
Reply to  RWK

Because why not?

DB McWeebeton
DB McWeebeton
8 years ago
Reply to  RWK

Because that lot is too small for a Great Dane?

Look Around You
Look Around You
8 years ago
Reply to  RWK

Dogs everywhere. Short ones, tall ones, skinny ones, fat ones, all kinds of dogs.

CapHill
CapHill
8 years ago
Reply to  RWK

Agree. Why the dog. As part of the logo, it looks like an afterthought.

But, nice building. Thought was actually put into the design. Too bad most design of the new buildings on Capitol Hill was an afterthought.

Matt
Matt
8 years ago

I actually like the Crosby’s design. I wish we had more of these buildings with smaller foot prints and quality materials/window, instead of the giant monstrosities like next door.

matt
matt
8 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Agree it’s better looking, but isn’t it taller than the monstrosity next door?

Timmy73
Timmy73
8 years ago
Reply to  matt

I believe it is a similar height as what is next door but the neighboring property has a top floor setback making it look less hulking from the street.

Matt
Matt
8 years ago
Reply to  matt

‘Monstrosity’ is in reference to the footprint of the neighboring building. Buildings should not take up an entire city block.

Also, note: this building does not include that fucking ugly neon yellow/orange crap siding that the developers seem to think people actually like?

ADH
ADH
8 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Love it! Small footprint, urban, consistent with the feel of the historic neighborhood and use of real materials for finishing. Thank you!

poncho
poncho
8 years ago

Wow, this is the first actually nice project proposed in years for Capitol Hill.

genevieve
genevieve
8 years ago
Reply to  poncho

It’s a really, really nice design.

We’ll see how closely the final building resembles it even if the design board passes as is (thinking of the switcheroo in windows on the triangle building at 12th/Madison/Union).

Timmy73
Timmy73
8 years ago

The Crosby is a nice design. I agree, good to see they didn’t go with the contractor window packs from Home Depot. Someone actually cared about design and material.

The use of real brick is refreshing and its good to see on other projects cropping up like the row houses at Malden/Mercer (but what is underneath is shoddy).

artd
artd
8 years ago

“The signage of the project includes mounted steel lettering, some with backlighting and neon.”

So Bellevue, so suburban.

But otherwise it looks pretty good. That anyone wants to put up these nicely designed smaller buildings suggests that they do pencil out. There should be design guidelines limiting the size of any building on a block to 30-40% of the length of the block. The Lyric and others would then not be such catastrophic blights on the neighborhood. If it’s all most local architects and developers can or want to accomplish, then a series of smaller bad buildings is preferable to a single giant bad building on a block.

Matt
Matt
8 years ago
Reply to  artd

100% agreed. There should be a regulation prohibiting developers from taking an entire block for one massive building.

roygbivers
roygbivers
8 years ago

Can we have 500 more buildings just like the Crosby? Beautiful, timeless design, materials, form, functional industrial windows, height, density, and no parking (better for affordability for those who will rent here). This is the first time I think a developer/architect has completely nailed their first design round. Well done!

dc
dc
8 years ago

Glad to see a building that won’t look horribly out of place in 10 years and might actually age well. That signage, though… and it does look EXTREMELY close to the big mega-unit next door. Like, reach out and touch your neighbor close.

Ryan on Summit
Ryan on Summit
8 years ago

Hoping this building will be home to a distillery. The Crosby Stills.

Brian
Brian
8 years ago
Reply to  Ryan on Summit

Haha! Good call.

And also, I too like this building design. Hopefully they don’t change it after approval like what happened to the building on Republican & Boylston as well as the one on 12th & Union.

genevieve
genevieve
8 years ago
Reply to  Ryan on Summit

Don’t forget the attached hipster restaurant, making it Crosby, Stills, and Mash.

Add in a therapy center and it could be Crosby, Stills, Mash and Jung.

citycat
citycat
8 years ago

The Crosby looks like it may be a very nice building. If the finished product closely resembles the drawing, and the developer follows through on the use of quality materials, it will be a good demonstration of the fact that new construction doesn’t need to be ugly and tacky. The building going up next to it, on the other hand, is hideous. The yellow accents are ugly, and the off white color will look dingy after one winter of rain. The shape is grotesque. It has the appearance of a building from the former Soviet Union or a developing nation. Based on the drawing of the entire block, it appears that the name is “Excelsior.” That is near the top of the list of stupid names. What an embarrassment.

Matt
Matt
8 years ago
Reply to  citycat

Thank you! Does anyone know why developers/architects think that slapping on some hideous neon yellow/green/orange is going to contribute some pizzaz to the boring “breadloaf” monstrosity?

Also, I don’t know why Seattle has to suffer through so many white vinyl windows.

Matt
Matt
8 years ago
Reply to  citycat

Excelsior’s sister buildings. Puke.

http://www.mdgllc.net/project/

Kid
Kid
8 years ago
Reply to  citycat

Yes, thank you, citycat. I am still trying to figure out why the owners/developers of the apartment building that is going up across the street from the Joule (Harvard Ave?) elected to paint it in alternating patches of virulent orange, bilious yellow, nondescript blue and charcoal grey (all of this on the same side of the building, mind you). Sheesh. The poor people who live in the building next door are going to be able to light their apartments without having to open the curtains! Perhaps they are simply experimenting with different colors but I don’t think so.

Matt
Matt
8 years ago
Reply to  Kid

Good god, I live right down the street from that too. Did they let a 4 year old choose the color palate? What the hell were they thinking?

Mark
Mark
8 years ago

Though a small sample size, the comments here are much more positive than comments on similar stories mainly because the design doesn’t suck. I think some people who tend to lash out against density are really reacting to bad design. Assuming the final project lives up to the proposal, this is an example of what we should expect in our neighborhood.