‘Histories of Capitol Hill’ event reveals divides even as community comes together

Sara Galvin (Images: CHS)

Community thought leaders, activists and performers are organizing events around the city as part of Town Hall’s a year-long artists in residence event series. Designer Erik Molano brought together passionate activists for an ambitious undertaking with his first event, Histories of Capitol Hill and What We’ll Build Next. Before an audience at the Summit on E Pike last week they explored the challenge of maintaining the heritage of a community through growth and development.

“A lot of these buildings are being erased and with them the memories and people who inhabited them or gathered in and expressed themselves in those buildings,” said Molano, co-founder of brand agency Photon Factory. For Molano, who moved to Seattle five years ago to work at Microsoft, the demolition of old buildings “is a loss of history.

Following individual poetry readings and a presentation from Capitol Hill Housing at the Summit on Pike, a group of community advocates responded to prompts from Molano in an effort to determine what preserving heritage in a developing city means. The group spoke on a wide range of intersectional issues related to the affordable housing crisis.

The event was presented by Town Hall Seattle with funding from the Seattle Department of Neighborhoods and sponsorship by The Cloud Room. The Inside/Out Resident program is a series of community events during the year-long renovation of Town Hall on First Hill. The events are organized by a number of Seattle artists, performers and advocates from each district.

Participants last Monday grappled with the complex undertaking of negotiating equitable large scale municipal growth through poetry and personal stories. A consensus on ideas of ownership, heritage, and inclusion was difficult to achieve throughout the two hour gathering.

Seattle Civic Poet Anastacia Renee described her preference for self segregation as protection from perceived appropriation and land grabs. “I’ve been watching white people go to soul food restaurants and they come in as if they own the place, or that they have power and are rude to people working there, never acknowledging that they’re taking advantage of someone else’s culture.” Renee has lived in Capitol Hill for two years and Washington for over a decade. She shared her personal experience with racial tensions, invisibility and social appropriation of black public figures.

In this tense environment of fear, it seems like new arrivals face an uphill battle. “Anyone who has been at a place longer with more roots should automatically have more privilege in determining what is happening in the area,” Renee said.

The group of seven activists represented an array of gender identities and races and many points of view but shared the same fear of losing their community identity. The focus of the event evolved from a general concern for retaining a sense of place to the affordable housing crisis.

Through their poetry and insight, the participants who work as artists and educators modeled a community looking for common ground while simultaneously jockeying for social and literal territory as rapid and expensive development thins the density of niche social venues like The Cuff and minority populations like LGBTQ+ community elderly.

Capitol Hill Housing senior planner Alex Brennan presented a slideshow depicting the cost structure of projects past such as the 12 Ave Arts development and future endeavors to install affordable housing for youth and elderly members of the LGBTQ+ community.

“We’ve created a system where we’re restricting all of the new development in our city into a very tiny fraction of the city and that’s one reason we’re getting the kind of development we do. We are starting to see people organizing and going to the 65% of our city that is exclusive to single family zoned areas where those houses are becoming worth a million dollars and saying we need to have affordable housing here,” he said.

Participants agreed that affordable housing anywhere in the city should be regarded as a right and not a privilege, though for whom revealed competing agendas. Author Sara Galvin anecdotally suggested the long running tenure of working class residents should be rewarded by entitlement to the neighborhood, whereas others equated the idea of population shifting to the subjugation and discrimination of resident minority groups.

Galvin said she grieves the separation of her family with roots on the Hill as the rising cost of housing is pushing out its previously defining human infrastructure. “I hate the overseas investors that have no stake in the community. They don’t care about queer people or people of color, or poor people or my dad who’s a carpenter who has been working in the shipyards since I was a little kid and he’s had to move out of town. My own dad had to move out of town. I have to get on a f****** bus for an hour to see my own dad,” she said. Galvin read selected poems from her book Ugly Time.

While city officials, unscrupulous developers and the tech industry in Seattle were generally blamed for costing out long time residents, some of the poetry and insights from the speakers implicated negative social dynamics as well. Tokenism, appropriation, ancestral guilt over disenfranchisement of Native communities and regressive identity politics were named as disrupting to the community. The likely conclusion being that once an economically driven exodus from the city center fractures a neighborhood and social friction weakens the community, development can proceed relatively unchecked.

Renee says Capitol Hill’s communities are facing erasure. “Not only are you taking over a place and kicking people out but when you do it you’re being rude and disrespectful and you have no idea about the history – Like why are you upset? We’ve made you ‘re neighborhood safe. I don’t think anyone should come into a space and take over and not even acknowledge – It’s the privilege of wherever I go I own this space.”

As the panel sifted through the vast topic of wealth and inequality, answers to the city’s housing crisis were few — and emblematic of class warfare. Less bleak was the earnest attention of a room filled with 75 community members and the neighborhood’s willingness to talk it out, vent, and come together.


UPDATE: YAY! We're back above 700 subscribers! Join the club! Consider becoming a subscriber at $1/$5/$10 a month to help CHS provide community news. Help push us back to the 700 mark... and beyond You can also sign up for a one-time annual payment.


 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

6 thoughts on “‘Histories of Capitol Hill’ event reveals divides even as community comes together

  1. “Anyone who has been at a place longer with more roots should automatically have more privilege in determining what is happening in the area,” Renee said.

    Proponents of redlining would agree.

  2. So sorry your tummy hurts. Must have distracted you from typing “without” instead of “with”. And do you need her to say “not all white people” every time she says “white people”? Or can you fill in the damn blank and focus on the original point calling out a pattern of inappropriate behavior of some white patrons? Are you concerned that the actions of some white people affect how all white people are seen in society writ large? Now where have I heard that concern before. Also you weren’t at the event. You have one quote, not the full statement. You should appreciate hearing someone else’s point of view and considering it when you patronize a business in the future. And for an analogous point: drunk straight women from the suburbs having a wacky night out at a crazy gay dance club treating it like a safari. What an exotic experience!

  3. She didn’t say “some white people”, she said “white people.” I take that to apply generally because she does not modify her statement with an exception. And she practices self segregation to protect herself from what the author describes as “this tense atmosphere of fear.” What a gross overreaction.

    The implication is by walking into a soul food joint I have to be careful not to appropriate someone’s culture. Forgive me if I decline to walk through life treading so delicately. I am not sure the proprietor would be so apprehensive about my presence, or the presence of anyone who just wants to come in and have some good food. And if someone of any color or persuasion comes in and treats the staff or other patrons badly, I expect said proprietor to deal with them appropriately.

    As for the event, it seems like yet another example of the overly precious navel gazing this city is becoming famous for. I for one am sorry to see I funded it through the Dept of Neighborhoods. And I hope my typing meets your very exacting standards this time Max.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *