Post navigation

Prev: (02/10/10) | Next: (02/10/10)

Central District News: New streetcar analysis looks good for ‘Two-way Broadway’ route, bad for 12th Ave

This week’s open houses for the streetcar project include the first detailed analysis of cost, ridership, and other impacts for the various routes that are under consideration. The updated set of information from the Seattle Department of Transportation also does not bode well for 12th Ave due to bicycle safety and accessibility concerns. There are two more open house sessions on Thursday — more on those below.

Here’s how the alignments are shaping up with the new analysis:

  • Two-way Broadway – Scores the highest overall, with the lowest construction cost, nearly the highest ridership, and fewest impacts to traffic and cyclists
  • Broadway/12th Couplet – Scores in the middle of the pack, with slightly less ridership, slightly higher construction costs, and a big penalty for interfering with an existing cycling route.
  • Boylston/Seneca & Boren/Seneca – The westernmost routes score lowest overall, with much higher construction costs, higher operating costs, and longer travel times. The one area they do better in is ridership, with the top numbers compared to other routes, although only 5% higher than Broadway in fully built-out conditions.

It’s important to note that construction cost estimates on the westernmost routes on First Hill currently exceed the $132 million budget that is provided by Sound Transit. That means that the city would have to chip in its own money to build them — unlikely given the current state of city finances — or find alternative sources of funding like the federal grants being considered for the Aloha extension. The Boren/Seneca route is also the most expensive in terms of operating cost, coming in at a round value of $5 million, putting it perilously close to the $5.2 million value of the annual operating subsidy provided by Sound Transit.

Thursday’s streetcar open house meetings will happen between 11:30 AM and 1 PM and again from 4 PM to 7 PM at the Seattle First Baptist Church at 1111 Harvard Ave.

Here is the full matrix of data presented on the 5 routes at the open houses. More details on the criteria used is contained in the ‘FirstHillStreetcarAlignmentAssessmentSummary.pdf’ document linked above.

 

Meanwhile, newly released documents raise some negative points about putting a streetcar on 12th Avenue.

Bicycle Impact – A Streetcar Bicycle Facilities Analysis says that 12th is “a key north/south bicycle route” and that “there are no other comparable bicycle connections through this portion of the City.” While the report says that streetcar tracks would have a “moderate impact” on 12th, it concludes that “streetcar tracks on 12th Avenue could significantly degrade the current cycling environment on this roadway.”

Accessibility – A 1st Hill Streetcar Accessibility Report analyzed the steep slope between 12th and Broadway and suggested that the city may want to install a somewhat fantastical set of escalators and moving walkways to help people up and down the hill on Columbia and/or Marion. It’s important to point out that the report concluded that “current accessibility codes will not require SDOT to make improvements to the routes of travel” between stops on the streetcar. (emphasis added)

It’s important to point out that accessibility concerns go both ways. Placing the only streetcar options at the top of the hill on Broadway or further west would obviously rule out all access for any disabled persons at Seattle U or who live in the apartments down in that valley. Having at least one stop on 12th still gives a wider range of people access to transit and a good connection to a light rail stop.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew Taylor
Andrew Taylor
14 years ago

Broadway/12th couplet: “a big penalty for interfering with an existing cycling route”

The analysis only included immediately adjacent N/S streets. Those to the west are interrupted by Seattle U. and those immediately to the E. are also interrupted. If the consultants had looked at 14th or (better) 15th Avenues, they’d have found wide, quiet north-south streets that are great alternatives (and surely superior ) to already traffic-filled 12th Avenue. Even 60 year-old geezers use 14th and 15th as their preferred routes to get from Yesler/Downtown to Capitol Hill. How long’s it going to take you to ride 4 blocks on a bike?

It would be a valid concern if there were NO good alternative bike routes, but there quite blatantly are: the consultants just didn’t see them (did they try cycling around?).

Now the water main under 12th, that’s another story.

snarky
snarky
14 years ago

Great. Since it’s absolutely no issue for bikes to go 3 blocks up to go from 12th to 15th, it will also be absolutely no issue for people to go 3 blocks down from 12th to Broadway to catch the streetcar. Problem solved!

Blue Swan
Blue Swan
14 years ago

Broadway is heavily driven, crossed by pedestrians, bicycled.

Putting a 200 ton monster like a “streetcar” — and here Seattle uses the term loosely as these Red Monsters are more like full sized Light Rail Trains — are going to slough through busy shoppers.

Sounds like a blueprint for disaster…

Andrew Taylor
Andrew Taylor
14 years ago

Very fast pedestrian: 4 mph.

Poky cyclist (me) 12 mph.

See the difference?

Disenfranchised
Disenfranchised
14 years ago

Why does the “best” route bypass the Virginia Mason Medical Center complex in favor of cute little shops on Broadway? Shouldn’t we be serving real transportation needs instead of playing chamber of commerce? And thanks for asking, First Hill would be very happy with an extra 5% of trips off our streets.

Come to think of it, isn’t this the FIRST HILL Streetcar, financed by Sound Transit because FIRST HILL didn’t get a light rail station like Cap Hill did?

Biker
Biker
14 years ago

12th Avenue is a pretty busy bike street, I use it all the time. And I also use Westlake Ave where the SLUT is without problems. I think bikes can deal with streetcars better than cars can.

I think on either route it will be a great addition and I’m excited to get it done. 12th (and 14th0 I think would be much better as far as areas that could use a little traffic and business development, and neither street has a bus route.

seadevi
seadevi
14 years ago

Just an FYI Andrew – I can get up to 5 miles an hour walking

Zz
Zz
14 years ago

No it is not the first hill streetcar. It is a streetcar to serve first hill, capitol hill, and the ID. It is First Hill only in name.

mapsmith
mapsmith
14 years ago

Sorry Zz: it’s First Hill in the official ST / CityOfSeattle Agreement too. Only CHS’s wildly tilting bias makes it “only in name”.
And as far as prupose, that’s stated too: it’s not to ‘serve’ any neighborhood per se, but to connect First Hill to the Light Rail. If it serves anything, it’s Link. Also, the legal docs state that major ’employment centers’ must be partly the focus of alignment /station choice.

Disenfranchised: leave the hospitals out of it and just look at traffic, pollution, and transit times (check the census actually – all the facts are there on seattle.gov): First Hill is the worst-served by transit, with the worst average transit travel times of any of the involved ‘hoods (ID, FH, CapHill, 12thAve hood). Boren & Madison are tieddown by rushhour car traffic congestion. If not a streetcar, then buses on FH need a whole makeover for sure.

I still think an odd duck option might be better:
a Minor to Bellevue to Olive alignment (sans any bloody loops)
would get the best speed (no 90 degree corners) AND best ridership (drives through the heart of city density, parallel to the 3rd ave ‘transit’ tunnel), with all the potential to tie employment centers together with commerce and residents to the Light Rail AND potential to expand to Aloha (or 15th).
So, yeah. Someone tell me why other options aren’t being weighed, in apple to apple comparisons??

mapsmith
mapsmith
14 years ago

Given the city’s (nation’s) inevitable population growth and the mandate by law to provide more density in the city to curb sprawl,
as well as the likelihood that due to transportation needs (like needing to travel more than one person, transport for children and elderly, and work-related gear transport) a majority of that new growing populace with opt for some form of vehicle (electric car or gas-miser motorcycle, we can only hope)…
how would you propose avoiding road-rage inducing clogs of vehicle traffic (1 to 2 tons of ‘deadly monster’) that would likely cause just as much if not more damage/harm/death than a
traffic reducing,
non-gasoline powered,
expandable capacity,
permanemtly tracked,
regular like clockwork,
vehicle that can transport thousands a day….?

If you have an anti-streetcar argument instead based on reason rather than fear I’d be happy to listen.