Post navigation

Prev: (08/12/10) | Next: (08/12/10)

Why City Council sent north Broadway extension letter — Plus, new name for ‘First Hill’ streetcar?

The head of the City Council’s transportation committee says the Council’s late-July letter to Sound Transit spelling out Seattle’s desire for a study of an extension of the First Hill streetcar line isn’t the first salvo in a war. And, he says, we might not be calling it the First Hill streetcar much longer, either. More on that, below.

“I don’t anticipate a fight at all,” City Council member Tom Rasmussen told CHS this week. “No one has indicated opposition from the Sound Transit board.”


When we first reported the Seattle City Council’s decision that included support for a study of an extension to north Broadway as part of its streetcar resolution, Publicola talked with Issaquah deputy council president Fred Butler, head of the Sound Transit board’s capital committee. “We have an agreement with the city of Seattle for a certain scope of work and for a certain amount,” Butler told ‘Cola.

The City Council’s July letter to Sound Transit CEO Joni Earl looks like it could be a reaction to that sentiment. One Council staffer did tell us that the memo is a response to buzz around City Hall that Sound Transit is planning to push back on spending to study extending the streetcar to Aloha. Add to that a growing deficit for future Sound Transit projects and things look bleak for the extension.

But Rasmussen tells us this week that the letter is simply a first step in formalizing the Seattle Department of Transportation’s plan to repurpose cost savings from the bids to build the streetcar line as planned to John. “I haven’t heard that there is opposition to this,” Rasmussen said. “This is a fully funded project. I think that any effort to take funds away will face a very difficult path. Our request is within the budget.”

As reported previously, while Rasmussen may not have heard any push back from the Sound Transit board, that doesn’t mean the agency is sounding positive about the possible extension study. “Given where we are today with revenues, it’s hard to see us having a surplus at the end of the program,” Sound Transit spokesperson Bruce Gray wrote in an e-mail to CHS last month.

And the new name for the First Hill streetcar which is actually planned to run from the International District, through First Hill and across Capitol Hill? Rasmussen said there may be some movement afoot to give the line a name that works for all the communities it will serve citing examples from other cities that involve letters or numbers like the A Train. He didn’t bother to mention the SLUT because he knew you would. More suggestions for a name for the line in comments, please. And I know somebody already asked this question but he was joking and I’m dead serious. Really.

Here is the Council’s letter:

 

Dear Joni:
We are writing to affirm the Seattle City Council’s interest in pursuing a request to the Sound Transit Board to use anticipated excess funds from the First Hill Streetcar project for work associated with extending the planned route north ofBroadway and Denny. This request is consistent with the agreement approved by both parties in late 2009, the Funding and

Cooperative Agreement between the Central Puget Sound RegionalTransit Authority and the City of Seattle for the Implementation of the FirstHill Streetcar Connector Project.

Currently, City transportation staff estimate Seattle can build the Council-approved First Hill Streetcar route for $125.4 million, which includes design and construction contingencies. Given this, the City is confident that “excess” funds will be available from the $132.8 million in ST2 capital funds budgeted for the First Hill Streetcar. At this stage, the City is only seeking $750,000 ofthe $7.4 million in anticipated excess funds for conceptual engineering and environmental review associated with extending the route. This will still leave a $6.7 million “cushion” that could be tapped in the event the Council-approved route between Pioneer Square and Broadway and Denny incurs unanticipated costs. (Should the City decide to proceed with extending the First Hill Streetcar route north of Broadway and Denny, the Council anticipates a follow-up request to the Sound Transit Board to use any remaining First Hill Streetcar project funds, up to $132.8 million, to help pay for the extension. The City recognizes it is responsible for securing any other funds needed beyond the $132.8 million allocated in ST2 for the First Hill Streetcar).

Until the City completes State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements for the First Hill Streetcar, and then obtains final project approval from the Sound Transit Board, the Funding and Cooperative Agreement limits Seattle expenditures to $5.4 million. City transportation staff anticipates SEPA review will be completed in late August and the City will likely seek Sound Transit Board approval for the final project in September. At the same time, Seattle would also like to obtain the Board’s approval to use $750,000 for conceptual engineering and environmental review associated with extending the route north ofBroadway and Denny. In anticipation of this timeline, City Council staffwill work with Councilmember Conlin to prepare the appropriate motions for the Sound Transit Board’s consideration. To that end, we hope that Sound Transit staff will work cooperatively with our staff, Christa Valles, to ensure the appropriate documents are prepared and processes are followed to bring this issue before the Sound Transit Board in a timely manner.

Want to get involved in the community effort to shape the streetcar plan? Check out the Complete Streetcar Campaign’s Facebook page for information on their initiatives and next planning meetings.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Wells
Michael Wells
10 years ago

Well, if we use the first letter of the names of the respective neighborhoods we could make it the FIC (which I like because it reminds me of fiction). If we add an ‘H’ for the 2 Hills it could be the FICH.

But I say we name it Charlie.

Mike with curls
Mike with curls
10 years ago

Two hills – First and Capitol.

So, a hill name? Two Hills line? No, but, you see the theme.

Hillbilly? Rainbow line? Ah, it serves very diverse pieces of Seattle …

Rainbow line, has a nice ring, and logical color scheme.

Confused
Confused
10 years ago

Leprechauns?

I don’t see the association of the rainbow with the diversity of these neighborhoods.

MikeH
MikeH
10 years ago

I had a few thoughts…Hilltop Line/Trolley/Streetcar. Although I def like the Rainbow Line suggestion better

seattlekps
seattlekps
10 years ago

I guess I don’t care what they call it…just fund the Aloha extension! Can’t even support a line that doesn’t include all of Broadway.

As for a name…how about the Pioneer Line? Or even the “Sea to Sky” Line. They can call it the S2S Line. OK, maybe not…

Bill B
Bill B
10 years ago

how about the “(Not) Central (District) Link”

jonathan
jonathan
10 years ago

No corny name please, just call it Streetcar B and at the next redesign, start using “Streetcar A” instead of South Lake Union Streetcar.

If you were visiting a new city, wouldn’t you wish the transit lines had letters or numbers instead of names (some with multiple words)?

Aaron
Aaron
10 years ago

Ask Starbucks or Amazon to sponsor the extension north to John and in return agree to call the line the Starbucks line or the Amazon line.

Aaron
Aaron
10 years ago

Sorry, meant to say Aloha, not John. I certainly want the streetcar to extend *beyond* John to Aloha.

archie1
archie1
10 years ago

Yeah, and while we’re at it, we should just rename all our neighborhoods, too. I like 3 for capitol hill….then this site could be neighborhood3seattle.com. And instead of the Fremont Bridge, it could be the Neighborhood 2 Bridge.

ibarrere
ibarrere
10 years ago

I agree entirely. Fancy names are nice sometimes, but really, it would be quite logical to just letter them, especially considering that more lines are in the works.

Saul Goode
Saul Goode
10 years ago

So perhaps there will need to be a color (please no letters – is anyone seriously calling Metro RapidRide by their A, B, C names?) although this would get complicated since the SLU line has three different color cars. In any case, as has been pointed out by Jarret Walker at Human Transit and others in Portland, transit lines that spell out their corridors is a simple yet powerful way of providing route information to casual users.

gary
gary
10 years ago

How about the ID-Hill streetcar? Captures the ID, as well as both First and Capitol Hill. (An alternative could be the ID-Hills Streetcar.)

It rolls off the tongue easily: “Im gonna take the ID-Hill to that new Japanese Izakaya on Jackson”