Post navigation

Prev: (06/22/12) | Next: (06/22/12)

Grassroots movie with lots of neighborhood scenes opens on Capitol Hill

Spotted on Capitol Hill in 2010

A film that turned several areas of Capitol Hill into Seattle circa 2001 is ready for the big screen. Today, Grassroots opens at the Harvard Exit on Capitol Hill, after having filmed many of its scenes in the neighborhood. Director Stephen Gyllenhaal will be at all showings of his movie from Friday, June 22 to Sunday, June 24.

Filming on Capitol Hill took place starting in June 2010 — you may have seen this Pike/Pine bar turned into a coffee house or this man in a polar bear suit walking through the streets. Some of you may even appear as extras. Any of you we should watch for? Oh, by the way, the story also has its real-life Capitol Hill connections.


As Gyllenhaal sees it, Grassroots is meant to be an inspiring film about the little guy pushing back–”even though ‘too big to fail’ wasn’t around when I started making Grassroots,” he writes at HuffPo, “the idea of a bully rationalizing his right to run a playground was.”

There’s a curious tension in Grassroots between this urge to broad-brush a heroic uprising against some suitably powerful figure, and the movie’s smaller-scale personalities, their tinpot aspirations and quixotic conflicts. As an example of tender rapprochement, there’s a late scene where one character accepts a ride in another’s car. In another director’s hands, that could be farce, or satire, but from Gyllenhaal, it feels like an implicit admonition for us all to grow up and work for the common good.

The Comet stars as a coffee shop (Image: CHS)

The story of Grassroots hews in reworked-for-movies fashion to the actual history of Grant Cogswell’s surprisingly unthought-out, one-issue run for Seattle City Council in 2001, against sitting Councilman Richard McIver. As the movie tells it, Monorail monomaniac Cogswell has no traction in his race, until his handler Phil Campbell hits upon the idea of getting free publicity by suing the City of Seattle. Chutzpah!

(Image: CHS)

That plus Grant’s penchant for roaming around town in a polar bear suit — now part of a Twitter marketing strategy — is the sort of thing that energizes disaffected youth, who come out of the hipster woodwork to get involved in Cogswell’s campaign. Gyllenhaal gets, for what’s being called a comedy, a remarkably sober-sided performance from Jason Biggs as Campbell, the man who has to wrangle his obstreperous candidate, try to keep his relationship on life support, and ride herd on a gang on campaign volunteers.

Despite turning famed watering hole the Comet Tavern into a coffee house, Gyllenhaal otherwise keeps the movie’s visual sensibility fairly indie; people look suitably scruffy, the streets cold, the crisp mountains and early fall sunsets beautiful. Even Tom Arnold fits right in as a grumpy, harried bartender.

As Gyllenhaal points out, his set-in-2001 film points to much that would lie in the future: Even when he started work on it, he writes, “I couldn’t have predicted an Occupy Wall Street Movement and the issues it’s raised, nor the surreal Republican debates, Romney’s etch-a-sketch journey and the Democrats’ gentle drift towards the Tea Party.”

I’m not so sure prediction is the right word — these preoccupations, the tendency to construe events to fit a narrative, seem woven into Grassroots. Yes, Seattle and populism go together (we founded the Tea Party, after all) but when you look at what Gyllenhaal ignored from Campbell’s book, Zioncheck for President, there’s a consistent up-with-youth-activism theme that came from somewhere besides burnt-out-wreck Campbell. He had penned a cautionary tale about being caught in the grip of charismatic ideologies and not dealing constructively with mental problems.

As he told Seattlest back in the day: “What did we accomplish? Nothing. We lost. Grant quit politics and I left town, end of story.” (That said, Campbell is equable when it comes to the distance between his and Gyllenhaal’s take: “Hollywood Gutted My Book, But That’s OK.”)

Personally, I like Campbell’s flamethrower approach, and miss the spectre of Marion Zioncheck, who hovered over Campbell’s tragicomedy to provide proof that as bad as things get, there’s usually someone out there who’s got it worse. It gave context to Cogswell’s rantings about the Monorail’s purity v. other modalities (this cannot play especially well with today’s hipster Seattleites who can’t wait for the fatcats’ gold-plated lightrail to be extended). Besides, Campbell implicated himself in “going off the rails on the crazy train” that was the Cogswell campaign–and, by extension, the idea of being fired up too much by a charismatic or forceful leader.

For all its faults, Campbell’s book undertook to tell you the truth — about many things, including starting a campaign from scratch, the symptoms of bipolar disorder, transportation infrastructure, and the history of Northwest populism. Grassroots seems to want to dispense with the messiness in favor of a “small is beautiful” parable. It pulls this off, mostly (though, the introductions and exits for a few too many characters seem to have hit the editing room floor). With distance and time, it may even improve. It’s just hard not to imagine — knowing of the real-life Cogswell’s move to Mexico City — that that’s Gyllenhaal in the polar bear suit, shouting about things only beginning.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric
Eric
11 years ago

I was wondering why there was a guy(or gal?) in a polar bear suit outside the DeLuxe the other night.

gloomy gus
11 years ago

Lovely links too. Nice to see a sober view of the project from different angles. I’m looking forward to seeing it. I was worried when it got picked up only by Sam Goldwyn, which tends to buy a lot of straight-to-DVD fundamentalist Christian stuff for some reason (Kirk Cameron’s “Fireproof”, anyone?).

Tricky Rabbit
11 years ago

I wanted to like this movie because of various personal connections to it. Unfortunately, I didn’t. Check out the Stranger’s review this week, that sums it up pretty well. It didn’t ring true – and it’s based on a true story! Also didn’t like the love story aspect, don’t know why they have to add that stuff to ruin a movie. I have never heard anyone say “Gee, I really missed that they didn’t have enough of a love story.”

Bob
Bob
11 years ago

I thought the Seattle/Sound scenes were beautifully captured; maybe the best ever. I am embarrassed to admit, however, that I got distracted by that neon “espresso” sign hanging in the window of “The Comet” coffee shop: Quirky or careless that the sign hangs to be read from the inside? In any case, I am looking forward to finding a copy of the book.