Post navigation

Prev: (11/26/12) | Next: (11/26/12)

‘Overwhelming community support’ for 520 bike and pedestrian redesign

As the Seattle City Council’s SR 520 special committee meets this Monday to hear an update on WSDOT’s plans for the western portion of the new bridge and its connections to surrounding neighborhoods, the release of a report on public feedback shows overwhelming support for redesigning portions of the project to incorporate better pedestrian and biking elements.

Meanwhile, the Cascade Bicycle Club and Central Seattle Greenways have delivered what the groups call “a gift of overwhelming community support” to push for pedestrian and biking improvements in the designs.

“The Seattle City Council has until the end of 2012 to provide direction to WSDOT on how to proceed with final designs for the Seattle side of the SR 520 corridor,” the statement from Cascade reads. “But right now, plans for the project do not include critical biking and walking connections.”

Judging by the WSDOT summary of public feedback on its 520 designs, biking and walking advocates were effective in getting people to respond to the survey process earlier this year. Of the 1,600 responses…

The majority of comments are about bicycleand pedestrian connections. These include thefollowing:

» Over 1,000 comments in support for the14-foot regional shared-use path along Portage Bay Bridge.

» Support for dedicated bicycle and pedestrian paths with direct, convenient and safe access to main intersections, neighborhoods, and existing trailsthroughout the project area.

» General concern about bicycle andpedestrian connectivity and safety inand around the Montlake lid area and on Montlake Boulevard.

The Montlaker blog summed up the consensus here:

  • Portage Bay Bridge Trail: 1298 out of 1339 commenters in support continuing the 520 Bridge regional trail from Montlake to Roanoke and I-5 via the Portage Bay Bridge. That’s 97% consensus.
  • Montlake Blvd: 1028 out of 1102 commenters support improvements to pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements along both sides of Montlake Blvd. That’s 93% strong.
  • Bike/Ped Crossing at I-5 & Roanoke: 1146 out of 1245 commenters favor a 30-foot wide pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Interstate 5. That’s 92%.

CHS has reported on the opportunities to improve the 520 designs for non-motorized transit over the past year as WSDOT’s design process has played out. While there have been pockets of opposition from those living nearest the project, others have championed the cause of transforming the state project to do more than just create more lanes of traffic across Lake Washington.

Following Monday’s hearing, the Council has until January to pass a resolution stating its design preferences. The Seattle portion of the project also requires a plan to come up with $1.something billion to pay for it all. The good news on that front is WSDOT’s estimates continue to drop.

We’ve embedded the main document from Cascade below as well as an overview of changes being sought for the Montlake Lid area of the designs.

520 Included Documents1C Montlake Lid

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
8 years ago

This doesn’t directly mention it but I recall that the preferred alternative had the area between Roanoke and Delmar capped with some type of bike access to the Portage Bay bridge.

Is that cap still in the plan? I haven’t been able to figure out if it is or not.

8 years ago

Yes a Roanoke lid and Park is still very much in the plan. It isn’t being talked about because the design WSDOT proposed was more or less acceptable to everyone. You can dig more into the details here: