Post navigation

Prev: (03/06/16) | Next: (03/07/16)

Street Critic | Tight squeezes

(Images: John M Feit)

(Images: John M Feit)

One of the great joys of urban exploration is the variety of scales one encounters in the built environment. While that range on Capitol Hill is generally restricted to small to medium building types, even such a limited offering provides some startling juxtapositions. As a bit of an architectural taxonomist, I notice several potential causes for these juxtapositions: those resulting from a change in zoning, those built on very small parcels of land, and  those that are simply the result of finding a good deal on rent.

Possible zoning changes are exhibited in two neighboring buildings on 18th Ave E, north of E John. For the uninitiated, zoning prescribes not only how big and what uses a building may have, but also dictates how far it needs to be set back from the street and neighboring properties. In the examples below, there may either have been no zoning when the apartments were built next to the single family homes; or, the zoning may have changed to allow such a proximate mix in uses. The closeness of the buildings to one another certainly would not be allowed under today’s building and zoning codes, at least not without significant changes to their designs. The tight fit between the buildings provides a finer weft of the built history of our neighborhood because they are nearly contemporaneous, and do not contrast in appearance as buildings whose construction is separated by many decades.

The next example — building on small parcels of land — is quite clever and one which I would enjoy seeing more of: building housing on a mere scrap of land in a size and shape complementary of the task at hand. This building just off 15th Ave E is so well situated to its narrow site and alley frontage it is hard to imagine it anywhere else — something that is hard to say about most recent development. Having only a handful of units it adds a bit more density to the neighborhood in a slight-of-had kind of way – policy makers take notice! It looks good, too.

I am sure we shall see more examples of the final example of today’s taxonomies: space that seeks a good deal on rent by making the smallest of venues work. Little Uncle, whose tasty food is the reason this stalwart of Hill cuisine has thrived despite its cramped quarters, is the type of space we are bound to see more of the Hill. Around five feet deep (if that), there is just enough space to prepare food and have one very small table for diners. Its new sit-down restaurant space on the same E Madison block opened Friday, by the way. CHS wrote earlier about the project here — though they’ve opted to stay with the name Little Uncle instead of making the Big Uncle change planned earlier.

The original Little Uncle’s fully exposed-to-the-street operations have lent this little part of Madison a distinctly big city feel. Although change is afoot at Little Uncle and the nature of this space is evolving, the ability to succeed and grow here can fuel the dreams of future entrepreneurs of limited means looking for a spot to hang a shingle.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Timmy73
Timmy73
8 years ago

Fun article as I too enjoy making these observations. There is a yellow victorian over near Spring and 16th that had to have the bay window removed as a townhouse was build right tight up against the house. You can’t run your hand between the roof and new neighbors wall – crazy!

I watched the above garage units going up behind the Canterbury, while they are a fishbowl to that building, its a great use of unused alley airspace.

I love urban density, but I also like sunlight and some breathing room. Hope we can strike the balance as we grow.

Nope
Nope
8 years ago

The 15th ave example seems like something dpd might do a better job of controlling : almost no outdoor space for the inhabitants, squeezed into an alley, presumably built to maximize profit for rental.

Ian
Ian
8 years ago
Reply to  Nope

Why do the inhabitants need “outdoor space”? This isn’t required for people in apartment buildings, so why for these folks? What stands out more strikingly is the prime real estate devoted to automobile storage, (as mandated by DPD).

George
George
8 years ago

Always appreciate seeing proper photo work on here, John!

John M Feit
8 years ago
Reply to  George

Thanks, George. I am glad it is appreciated.

Mark
Mark
8 years ago

Thanks for interesting article. Love seeing clever uses for small urban spaces.

Glenn
Glenn
8 years ago

The 15th ave sight is perfect. While the residents may have no outdoor space as mentioned above, the project utilized unattractive alley space ans turned it into attractive living quarters. We need more of this kind of clever, attractive development, not less. Get DPD out of the way on this kind of project please.

Suzi
Suzi
8 years ago

The 15th ave Alley building is nothing to be happy about anathema. It was built in the location that was originally a row of carriage houses for its associated building. It cuts out light and any sense of space/view from all the west facing windows of that associated structure, as well as blocking light for north side residents of the building next door. Not to mention that it is an ugly eyesore crammed in between 3 beautiful old brick buildings.

There is a reson zoning laws require space from the street and space between buildings, and when that is pushed to the limit it greatly reduces livibillity.

And your first example? I always feel sad for the folks whose tiny home is now crammed in and overshadowed by towering neighboring buildings.

Mars Saxman
8 years ago
Reply to  Suzi

We live in a city, and physical density is the price of the high connectivity that makes a city worthwhile. Zoning laws that mandate wasted space between buildings make cities less valuable places to live.

Mixte Feelings
Mixte Feelings
8 years ago
Reply to  Suzi

I doubt the view was much better before, since it would have looked across to the rear of the Canterbury building. A good amount of space remains between the apt. building and the new structure. As for outdoor space, the building could not have had much before these went up, and it is a short walk to Volunteer Park, Interlaken, Seven Hills, or Louisa Boren Park.

Robert Ketcherside
8 years ago

Thanks for this article! Building codes and zoning laws are ever evolving as we learn to expect different results in our built environment. It’s fun to look back and see surprising examples of past and present laws.

I was reminded of one of my favorites on my bookshelf, a Japanese book titled “Super Legal Buildings”. Here’s a bit I wrote about it soon after it came out, http://www.zombiezodiac.com/base/books/super_legal_buildings.html . I think you would really enjoy it, even if you don’t read Japanese. You can order a copy through Kinokuniya next to Uwajimaya, ISBN-13: 978-4395240029.