Post navigation

Prev: (04/26/18) | Next: (04/27/18)

Seattle set to go it alone on safe consumption

Left Behind

Seattle will stand alone in the effort to create safe consumption sites in King County — and there’s a push to utilize existing county health facilities in the city to do it.

The most recent maneuverings in the political process around creating the sites aimed at curbing the rising tide of opiate-related overdoses has left Seattle standing alone with officials pushing for the first site to be located at an existing King County public health center in the city.

The Seattle Weekly reported on King County Public Health officials icing any movement on a safe consumption facility outside Seattle until the city has shown the concept is working. “Currently there is not implementation work going on outside the City of Seattle,” a county spokesperson told the Weekly.

Meanwhile, KOMO reports that Seattle City Council member Sally Bagshaw has asked Jeff Sakuma, the mayor’s newly hired health integration strategist, to look at three existing Public Health Clinics as potential hosts for Seattle’s first safe consumption site. None of those sites is on Capitol Hill.

Safe consumption sites are facilities where people addicted to drugs can consume substances indoors with trained medical staff on hand to prevent fatal overdoses, reduce the spread of disease from dirty needles, and connect addicts to drug treatment services.

The Seattle site is planned to provide “hygienic space and sterile supplies,” overdose treatment and prevention, as well as “syringe exchange services” and “post-consumption observation space.” Capitol Hill has been discussed as a possible home for a Seattle site and organizations including the Capitol Hill Community Council have voiced support for the facilities.

Seattle has put up $1.3 million toward getting a site running in the city.

HELP KEEP CHS 'PAY WHAT YOU CAN' FOR EVERYONE -- SUBSCRIBE TODAY! Support local journalism dedicated to your neighborhood. SUBSCRIBE HERE. Join to become a subscriber at $1/$5/$10 a month to help CHS provide community news with NO PAYWALL. You can also sign up for a one-time annual payment.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moving On
Moving On
2 years ago

Does that save some money out of the $4mil annual budget? I should hope.

Still think the Harborview clinic is the right place, if we must.

2 years ago

Of course Seattle stands alone. Because this is a terrible idea.

The only winners out of this are the operators who will recieve millions of dollars of taxpayer funds to help addicts stay addicted. Congratulations, Seattle.

Fairly Obvious
Fairly Obvious
2 years ago
Reply to  Adam

By all means Adam, feel free to cite the sources for your claim. Because most studies I read online for European safe consumption sites show success and a reduction of emergency room visit costs greater than the cost of operation (excluding the value of human lives even). The Canadian sites are too new to conclude, but appear to be showing a positive effect.

Of course, facts and studies mean nothing compared to the sensationalist ramblings of a pseudo-anonymous commentor on a neighborhood blog.