Post navigation

Prev: (04/24/19) | Next: (04/24/19)

Here’s what 150 or so new apartments surrounding the (newly landmarked) Knights of Columbus building will look like

Still only a massing proposal and a design concept, this is what could rise next to the Knights of the Columbus building

Here is the first look at early design proposals for the two projects that will work together to shepherd the newly landmarks protected Knights of Columbus building into its new adaptive reuse future and add more than 150 new apartments to the block at Union and Harvard.

Design review: 704 E Union St and 722 E Union St

The projects from developers SRM Development and the Runberg Architecture Group will begin the city’s design review process with a joint session Wednesday night.

CHS reported on the $18.55 million sale of the 106-year-old clubhouse building and surrounding parking lots to SRM last summer as the local Knights chapter sold off its valuable asset on the rise of Harvard between First Hill and Pike/Pine. We detailed SRM’s early plans for development and an historically respective overhaul of the 33,708 square-foot Knights hall. Last week, the landmarks board approved SRM’s bid for protections on the building that will shape its overhaul. That protection plan still needs to be finalized by the developers and the landmarks board. SRM also nominated the building for a listing on the National Register of Historic Places and hopes to qualify for a federal tax credit.

Wednesday’s session won’t generally focus on the historic centerpiece of SRM’s development.

Instead, SRM and the architects from Runberg will be presenting the early massing plans for the two apartment buildings they hope will rise around the Knights building by the summer of 2021.

The projects pre-date the city’s Mandatory Housing Affordability program expansion and therefore are not subject to the rezoned heights in the area — or the affordability or in lieu payment requirements.

The first building, blue, above, will fill the land where the smaller parking lot now fronts E Union with a five-story, 37-unit apartment building. Under SRM’s vision, the preferred proposal would feature units an average of around 330 square feet each.

The second, red in the diagram above, is a much larger endeavor. The land currently home to a surface parking lot on Harvard is being planned for a seven-story project — boosted an extra story thanks to the Pike/Pine preservation incentive from not tearing down the Knights of Columbus building — with 125 market-rate apartments.

The design proposals to be reviewed by the board Wednesday include the required set of massing options for each building as well as a bonus set of dual design concepts for each for the board members to ponder and advise on. Another option with the options relates to the Harvard building where a set of “exceptional trees” can be retained thus splitting the building in two portions or removed and allowing the building to avoid being sliced in two. The giant scale of the combined projects also allows some big thinking when it comes to landscaping around the project so a compromise could be in order trading the old trees for a more ambitious landscaping strategy.

Parking for the development will be centered on the larger Harvard structure where architects are planning an underground structure with room for around 176 vehicles.

There is no commercial space being planned for either of the new buildings — the retail, restaurant, or insert your great idea for the future of the Knights building here future for the block could hinge on the adaptive reuse overhaul of the central structure. Or SRM could opt to create even more apartments in the rehabbed club building.

As for what that overhaul will entail, while the final agreement will need to be pounded out with the landmarks board, SRM has provided some details of what it hopes to achieve including window and masonry upgrades as well as some dramatic lighting.

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 

 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neighbor
Neighbor
4 years ago

176 parking spaces!?!? In this neighborhood, it should be zero!

Chris
Chris
4 years ago
Reply to  Neighbor

Most apartments want to have a car for weekends or longer trips.

DA
DA
4 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Please let us know your data source for “most apartments.”

Based on proximity to multiple forms for public transit within minimal walking distance of the project, parking should be capped at a maximum of .25 spaces per unit.

Jim98122x
Jim98122x
4 years ago
Reply to  Chris

says who? If that’s true, all these buildings with “too much” parking would learn it’s not profitable, and they’d stop doing it.

dftl
dftl
4 years ago

Parking spaces means they will be marketing to higher income occupants.

Sloopy
Sloopy
4 years ago
Reply to  dftl

They build parking into most buildings still. Affordable housing too. Most of Bellwether, Capitol Hill Housing and SHA buildings have parking spaces.

nettles
nettles
4 years ago
Reply to  dftl

exactly. this this this.

nettles
nettles
4 years ago
Reply to  nettles

in the words of a developer “they expect it.” well who is they??? in the middle of the city???

Jim98122x
Jim98122x
4 years ago
Reply to  nettles

the people who are actually renting them. Not the people who are pontificating on websites about who “shouldn’t” need a car

Dan
Dan
4 years ago

Completely agree with this comment, especially based on this except from the article:

“The projects pre-date the city’s Mandatory Housing Affordability program expansion and therefore are not subject to the rezoned heights in the area — or the affordability or in lieu payment requirements.”

Dan
Dan
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan

This was meant to be a reply to dftl’s comment.

RWK
RWK
4 years ago

I am very grateful that at least one developer has chosen not to demolish a beautiful old Seattle building.

M
M
4 years ago

I’ll miss that nieghborhood. More of the magical areas are gone since I’ve left.