Post navigation

Prev: (11/13/20) | Next: (11/13/20)

A ‘Make Them Scared’ #metoo movement on the Cal Anderson skate court

(Image: Hannah Krieg)

By Hannah Krieg, UW News Lab/Special to CHS

In the early hours of a morning in October, Abi heard a familiar voice outside her window.

“He left me with a bodily response,” she said. “If I see him in public or I hear his voice, I’ll go into full panic mode and think I’m dying.”

The voice belonged to an old flame, a skater who frequents Cal Anderson Park who Abi, in her early 20s, claims emotionally abused her during their relationship. When she looked out the window, she saw his graffiti tag sprayed across the wall opposite her.

“I felt like that was a tactic to gain more control over me,” she said. “It had gotten to a point where I couldn’t accept that anymore.”

It was then that Abi decided to share her story online.

The #​MeToo movement​ can also exist at a small scale, in a neighborhood, or in a community like the skaters who meet in Cal Anderson. There, an online document detailing one woman’s experience began collecting stories of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse within the Seattle skate scene. It grew with people adding their own accounts of abuse. Abi transitioned her Instagram feed to post these experiences, out abusers, and ultimately create an avenue for survivors to seek justice.

Seattle’s restaurant industry, writing sphere, and most similarly students at the University of Washington with Make Them Scared have all exposed patterns of abuse within their respective communities. On the morning of October 5th, a list of accused abusers and sexual predators hit Instagram. It was the skate scene’s turn to add names to Seattle’s ongoing vigilante abuser registry.

“There’s multiple goals when these [online accusations] happen: supporting the survivor, identifying the consequences for the person who caused harm, and figuring out our community responsibility,” said Heather Wehr, legal advocacy program coordinator at ​Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

Abi and the survivors that followed her lead were ready for a reckoning in their own community. To her, these instances of abuse within the Seattle skate scene were well-known and widespread.

Abi said she decided online accusations were not enough and took to Instagram to crowd-source solutions to “uphold progress and hold these people accountable.”

“As a community we do have a responsibility to respond when violence happens,” Wehr said. “This is survivors taking the first step to bring their experiences to their community and it matters what happens after that.”

For these survivors, the next step was drawing up a list of demands.

The demands laid out a path for reconciliation for the accused: cut ties with the community, issue a public apology, be transparent in involvement with communities in the future, and finally, seek professional help. Abi also says she sent the demands to those accused.

Abi felt this community action was more humane for both the survivors and accused than pursuing a case within a legal system that is punitive rather than rehabilitative.

“The experience of surviving a pattern of exploitation and control is by definition disempowering,” said Shannon Perez-Darby, an advocate who works in community accountability and transformative justice in the Seattle area. “People use all sorts of different skills in order to feel powerful again. If you don’t feel like you have access to institutional power, social power, economic power, one way people can feel powerful is through social media.”

Both Wehr and Perez-Darby agree that demands, when they are what Perez-Darby calls “right-sized”, can give survivors greater agency.

Abi says her demands were met to varying degrees.

While some of the skaters ignored or denied accusations, one person involved in the accounts said they were impressed by how someone they claimed “really fucked [them] up” handled the apology and that the effort helped bring closure.

In the days following the initial outing online, Abi noted the courts at Cal Anderson were empty. She believes that many of the accused went to skate in a different location.

Are there lessons here for other communities in Seattle as the issues of the #metoo movement continue in waves?

Asking abusers to leave a social group can “increase immediate safety for the survivors” and Wehr says ostracization of the accused is “one of the potential issues” with the demand to cut ties with their community.

“When someone we are close with ends up on a list like this, we should bring that person closer and tell them, ‘we need you to do better’,” Wehr said, careful to stress that this responsibility should not fall on survivors or people who otherwise do not have the capacity to help.

Skaters have, of course, returned to the court in Cal Anderson. Abi says she’ll continue to be vigilant.

“People know where to find me,” she said. “If people continue to be abusive, we’ll call it out again.”

The University of Washington News Lab gives advanced journalism students an opportunity to build a dynamic clip portfolio by reporting for any of 70 client news outlets in the greater Seattle area. CHS is proud to work with young journalists and feature their work. You can learn more here.


HELP KEEP CHS 'PAY WHAT YOU CAN' FOR EVERYONE -- SUBSCRIBE TODAY! Support local journalism dedicated to your neighborhood. SUBSCRIBE HERE. Join to become a subscriber at $1/$5/$10 a month to help CHS provide community news with NO PAYWALL. You can also sign up for a one-time annual payment.


Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nekrasova
Nekrasova
3 months ago

Pretty cool – it’s sort of like the justice system, except without the burdensome requirements of evidence, or meaningful consequences. What’s more, we can all feel safer knowing serial rapists would face just as strict justice as an emotional abuser under this system, being asked (sternly!) to apologize and face a withering round of therapy as well.

Tara
Tara
3 months ago

I have no idea what these young men are accused of so I have no opinion on the validity of this system. This woman claimed the man emotionally abused her. I think when these accusations are published specific facts should be given as to what transpired. I have seen way too many vague accusations using words like ‘abuse” in situations that turn out to not fit that definition.

RWK
RWK
3 months ago

While I can feel empathy for the victims of abuse, I don’t think that this kind of “vigilante justice” is the way to go. It’s a very slippery slope. If there is a valid case of abuse, it should be pursued through our legal system. It’s called the “rule of law.”

Emily
Emily
3 months ago
Reply to  RWK

That’s a lovely thought, but the reason women often take to social media to out their abusers is that the “rule of law” generally does not work for us in so many of these cases. I remember a woman calling in to KIRO radio stating she was groped on the street downtown, saw a policeman right across the street, went and reported it to him, and that he laughed and then told her she had to go to the precinct on Capitol Hill to file a police report. When she did, the officer basically told her there was nothing they could really do. It wasn’t until she told her story on the air and started getting media attention that the police “miraculously” caught the guy, who it turned out was a serial groper.

While I have concerns about social media vigilantism, especially in cases of verbal exchanges, where the line between someone being rude and someone being genuinely abusive can be blurred, it is often the only way for women to get any kind of justice, at least by protecting other women from these guys.

stan
stan
3 months ago
Reply to  Emily

“…the reason women often take to social media to out their abusers is that the “rule of law” generally does not work for us in so many of these cases.”

In the example you give, of Julia Marquand being groped in Westlake park, the police were investigating. From the news reporting I pulled up, the incident happened on 10/12/2014 and she was posting on Twitter about it, implying the police weren’t doing anything, on 10/13/2014. The police replied to her tweet the same day that they had her report and an investigator would be contacting her. It had been all of 24 hours before she “took to social media to get justice.” I’m not sure how it could be construed that the law wasn’t working in this case and that Julia needed social media to get the wheels rolling.