Post navigation

Prev: (05/05/21) | Next: (05/06/21)

Seattle sorts out plan for increased vehicle license fees: pedestrian improvements, bridge maintenance, and bicycle safety upgrades

A Seattle City Council committee voted unanimously Wednesday to earmark money from a new increase in the vehicle license fee for pedestrian improvements, bridge maintenance, and bicycle safety upgrades.

The doubling of the vehicle license fee from $20 to $40, passed by the council during the budget process in November, is expected to raise $3.6 million this year and then about $7.2 million annually after that.

The new revenue this year would fund $1.125 million in safety improvements as part of the city’s Vision Zero goal of ending traffic deaths. Another $1.025 million would go toward sidewalk maintenance; $850,000 for bridge rehab; $350,000 for bicycle lanes and other transportation upkeep; and $250,000 to “plan for a future transportation system that addresses our values and goals for equity, safety, and sustainability,” according to the council.

In future years, safe streets and safe sidewalks would each get 28% of the funds. Bridges? 24%. Ten percent for other transportation maintenance, 7% percent for planning and the remaining 3% would go into reserves.

These numbers were arrived at after the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) met with various stakeholders, including communities of color, earlier this year at the council’s behest to develop the proposed spending plan.

It did not get passed without a hitch, however.

An amendment, sponsored by council members Alex Pedersen and Lisa Herbold, wanted the council to consider $100 million in bond financing with 75% going to bridge maintenance after 2022, instead of the 24% set out in the SDOT plan. Bridges specifically noted include the University Bridge, the Ballard Bridge, and the Magnolia Bridge.

This seemed to critics to be a slap in the face to the stakeholders and transportation advocates involved in the original proposal.

“Councilmember Pedersen’s proposal to invert the investment is the opposite of what we need,” Ingrid Elliot, of climate justice organization 350 Seattle, said Wednesday. “This proposal steals funds that are crucial for the safety and accessibility of people cycling, walking, and rolling.”

They also argued that this $100 million, 20-year bond proposal would be just a drop in the bucket toward the billions needed to catch up on the city’s bridge maintenance backlog.

The amendment seemed to have the votes necessary to pass, but the committee instead decided on a compromise, pushed by Councilmember Dan Strauss, that stripped out much of the bond aspect and simply says “the Council may wish to consider bond financing as part of its deliberations on the 2022 budget.

It retains the original intent to ask SDOT to provide by the end of September a list of transportation projects which could be funded by $100 million in bond financing in 2022, including a minimum of $75 million on bridge maintenance, but does not say it’s the council’s intent to finance these projects through the vehicle license fee instead of street and sidewalk improvements.

This amendment “still successfully intensifies our commitment towards safety and sustainability of multimodal bridges that connect our communities, keep our economy moving,” said Pedersen, chair of the Transportation & Utilities Committee.

A comparison of the original amendment and the compromise, which was passed 5-0, can be seen here.

“My hope is that we don’t see these two things as mutually exclusive,” Councilmember Tammy Morales said Wednesday. “We need bridge maintenance and we definitely need to be moving toward our Vision Zero goals for pedestrian safety.

Pedersen said the bill could be voted on by the full council as early as May 10.

Give CHS a buck and support local journalism dedicated to your neighborhood. SUBSCRIBE HERE. Become a subscriber at $1/$5/$10 a month to help CHS provide community news with no paywall. You can also sign up for a one-time annual payment.

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
8 months ago

Tax the bicyclists on their super expensive bikes.

8 months ago
Reply to  PDiddy

I assume this is sarcastic since the vast majority of even used cars cost as much or more than all but the most expensive bikes (which are probably being used for pro racing, not commuting or errands or recreation). I also assume sarcasm since the costs of people driving 1/4 mile to walk their dog, 2 miles to get a coffee at a favorite shop, and so on add up to a lot of climate and health costs that will be visited on all of us, including folks who can’t drive or afford to drive.

8 months ago
Reply to  PDiddy

I’m happy to pay $10/yr for my 25lbs bike (it cost me $399 in 2009 BTW).

Are you willing to pay $1000 for a 2500lbs car (compact) and twice as much for heavier cars like SUVs or F150 trucks?