Post navigation

Prev: (11/18/21) | Next: (11/18/21)

Kaiser Permanente reluctant to act on Capitol Hill surface parking lots

(Image: CHS)

By Ryan Packer

When Kaiser Permanente purchased Group Health in 2018, its flagship Capitol Hill campus came with a Major Institution Master Plan. Used with hospital and university campuses around the city, the plan guides the long-term vision for how a given campus will grow, and sets parameters around how employees to and from the campus will get to work. Any time a major update is planned for a campus, the plan must be updated. Shortly after taking ownership of the property, Kaiser Permanente announced that they were planning a $400 million campus overhaul, and at the same time announced the formation of a Standing Advisory Committee (SAC) to guide the campus through any updates to the master plan.

Now some members of that advisory committee are trying to push Kaiser to move forward on some past commitments that have been made around the Capitol Hill campus, particularly when it comes to the 1.5 acres of surface parking lots that sit on 16th and 17th Ave close to campus. Those lots actually sit outside the boundary of the area guided by the campus plan.

David Dahl is an architect who lives in the neighborhood, and sits on the Standing Advisory Committee. “It definitely doesn’t feel like it’s a priority for them to follow through on the agreements they’ve made,” he said of Kaiser Permanente. “They’ve shown they can reduce their drive alone rate…I would like to see some follow through.”

Dahl points to a nationwide focus for the healthcare provider on housing stability as it sits on land that could be utilized for housing. The latest annual report from Kaiser Permanente noted that it had achieved a 41% drive-alone rate at the Capitol Hill campus in 2019, before the pandemic. That met the city’s target for drive-alone rates on Capitol Hill.

1.5 acres of surface parking lots sit along 16th Ave and 17th Aves E near Kaiser Permanente’s campus

Conversations around the future of those lots have been going on since at least 1974, when the Capitol Hill Community Council reached an agreement with Group Health, with a goal on paper of phasing out the existing surface parking lots.

“Group Health will continue to implement traffic reduction plans with the goal of phasing out present surface parking lots, especially the two large parking lots in the 300 block of 16th and 17th Avenues East. Toward that end, Group Health is continuing a program to reduce overall parking requirements by car-pooling, public transportation, regionalization of medical facilities, and other feasible and reasonable means,” the agreement read.

Kaiser Permanente’s master plan was adopted in 1988, making it among the oldest active institution master plans in the city. The timeline of the plan was only intended to extend through 1999, and included, in the last of four envisioned phases, a new parking garage structure to be constructed at the corner of 16th Ave E and E Thomas, with a skybridge connecting across Thomas.

The 1988 Group Health campus master plan envisioned a parking structure along 16th Ave E north of Thomas Street, with a skybridge connected to the rest of the campus.

But the issue of the new parking garage, both in the adopted master plan from 1988 and the agreement with a community council in 1974, is not directly tied to the issue of continuing to maintain surface parking lots in the neighborhood. The master plan calls for an evaluation of the lots after the third phase of development, before a proposed garage would be built. But that third phase never happened. As far as the master plan is concerned, it’s still 1995.

“[Group Health Cooperative] will, at that time and and with input from the community, reevaluate its continued need for those parking lots and will, if possible and appropriate in the light of such evaluation, revise its Master Plan to permit disposal of those off-campus parking spaces,” the 1988 plan read.

Kaiser Permanente has not been forthcoming about how it will address the lots. Employing tens of thousands across the country, Kaiser Permanente’s recent focus has centered on labor and a recently averted strike that is still sending ripples through its workforce with 60,000 expected to walk off the job this week in Northern California..

“Kaiser Permanente values the input and feedback of our community and the Standing Advisory Committee,” the company responded after CHS asked specific questions about the future of the surface parking lots. “We continue to abide by the development standards as outlined in the Major Institution Master Plan and will evaluate the services and facilities at Kaiser Permanente Capitol Hill Medical Center based on what best serves our members and community.” A spokesperson for the massive health care network did not answer a question about current utilization rates at either the surface parking lots or at its parking garage off Denny Way and 15th Ave E.

So far, the renovations to the Capitol Hill campus described to the advisory committee have been minor. Every yearly update since the change over ownership has noted that Kaiser Permanente has not taken any steps to proceed through the stages outlined in the master plan 33 years ago, so things sit in limbo. But if more major upgrades are proposed in the future, that could reopen the question of the surface parking lots that has been a topic of discussion for close to fifty years.

Rebecca Fox, another SAC member and retired urban planner, agrees with Dahl and others calling for a better plan for the lots. “They would be best used as not surface parking lots,” Fox said. “Kaiser has been saying it’s making excellent progress [around commute trip goals], which is great, and I would think that would lead to a re-evaluation of those lots”. Moving forward with a plan to convert the lots to other uses, she told me, would be an example of Kaiser Permanente being a “good community member”. “We need more housing on Capitol Hill,” she said.

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Violet
Violet
2 years ago

Tear down the ugly buildings and restore the grid. Those buildings belong in the suburbs, not CH.

Whichever
Whichever
2 years ago
Reply to  Violet

Yeah, having medical facilities nearby where the people live, what a ludicrous idea.

Marsha Shaiman
Marsha Shaiman
2 years ago

Car pooling to a doc appointment. Novel idea.

oliveoyl
oliveoyl
2 years ago
Reply to  Marsha Shaiman

the lots being discussed here are the big parking lots for employees not patients

Prost Seattle
Prost Seattle
2 years ago

With Kaiser Permanente putting a new facility near Harborview, I’m wondering if they will shelve the $400 million project up here on Capitol Hill.

I would think there would be value to build housing that they could earmark for employees of Kaiser Permanente, if not enough employees take up the housing then it can be opened up to the general population.

paul
paul
2 years ago
Reply to  Prost Seattle

maybe they will open a company store too

Adam
Adam
2 years ago

Interesting read. I’ve always wondered when the tides of change would impact those lots. I’m of course hoping for more affordable housing options for both KP staff and the wider community.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago

I’d still like them to make one of the lots available for charitable Christmas tree sales, like GroupHealth used to.

Andrew Taylor
Andrew Taylor
2 years ago

As I recall, the Capitol Hill RPZ around Group Health was put in to discourage Group Health employees from parking on the streets (and was funded by Group Health).
Employees tended to park just outside the RPZ (eg at 20th/John where I used to live) and at one point Group Health ran a shuttle to take employees to and from their on-street cars.

Aaron
Aaron
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew Taylor

Locals are still competing for on street parking even with the RPZ so providing staff parking helps.

People want the best care when they are ill. People don’t realize caregivers get off work at 1AM or are called to come in STAT at night and can’t use public transportation. Getting around Seattle metro area takes hours when using bus/light rail /ferry and our system doesn’t run at night with frequencies or at all to many in-city neighborhoods. Getting around is even worse when commuting via buses/rail/ferry outside Seattle.

I remember Harborview also used to provide shuttles for staff who parked on off- site lots because of parking issues.

Jeffrey Keever
Jeffrey Keever
2 years ago

Drive alone rates do not count the patients and their families that need parking, what would be the plan to accommodate this “customer” parking? No one is taking the bus to the doctor if they are sick or have a broken leg.

oliveoyl
oliveoyl
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeffrey Keever

the parking discussed here is not available for patients or their families but rather for employees

mixtefeelings
mixtefeelings
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeffrey Keever

Yes, actually people who can’t drive and don’t have other options do indeed take the bus when we are sick, or have to pay for a cab (which doesn’t require parking), or troubleshoot half dozen other solutions. I have walked to ERs and Urgent Cares including when I (incorrectly, thankfully) I thought I was having a heart attack and again when I burned my hand. I have biked with a broken toe to get x-rays (it didn’t hurt and it didn’t make it worse, sooo). I asked a co-worker to walk me to the Urgent Care two blocks form our office once. Etc. Singed, a person super tired of drivers acting like there aren’t a ton of people who can’t drive who also need to access medical care and other necessities, and of drivers being completely unable to conceive of other ways of getting around and utterly lacking any imagination about it and therefore assuming that if YOU can’t figure it out of do it, that we can’t, either. You are incorrect.

PeeDee
PeeDee
2 years ago

As a neighbor to these eyesores I can tell you it’s well past time the city forces Kaiser to sell the lots so they can be returned to residential usage.

I mean…it’s obvious that the then-Group Health just bought a bunch of houses in the neighborhood, knocked them down, and paved over the lots.

Such great urban planning.

They’re eyesores. They’re a poor usage of precious space in the city. It’s time for them to go.

My feeling regarding the parking problems created by redeveloping these lots is **exactly** what the city’s thinking should be, too: I don’t give a sh*t.

paul
paul
2 years ago
Reply to  PeeDee

It’s not your property or call to make. It belongs to the hospital, and you can’t send your government leftists in to “make” them sell it. Plus the parking lots are less objectionable than 90 percent of the new cheep, gray, soulless (and neoliberal, you lost sheep) “architecture” going up. You don’t like historic homes being town down, yet probably say nothing about the dozens of historic homes being demoed today for neo-liberal multifamily units replacing them. Infact you probably cheer lead for it in the name of “density”

Bataille
Bataille
2 years ago
Reply to  paul

Neoliberals?

Ripper
Ripper
2 years ago
Reply to  paul

Calm down, Paul.

Jim98122x
Jim98122x
2 years ago
Reply to  Ripper

2 things:

  1. telling someone to “calm down” is obnoxious and practically the same thing as telling them to shut up. Plus it never works— it has exactly the opposite effect. So…YOU calm down. See how that works? (Or doesn’t).
  2. Why? He’s completely right.
CD Rez
CD Rez
2 years ago
Reply to  paul

Yeah .. wtf are you going on about?