Post navigation

Prev: (11/08/21) | Next: (11/08/21)

Seattle regains its revenue footing as a new mayor is set to take office — UPDATE

Top of the spending list: Policing, homelessness, transit

By Ryan Packer

When Bruce Harrell takes office early next year as Mayor of Seattle, the city budget he inherits from his predecessor Jenny Durkan is one largely recovered from the revenue tumult of the past two years and one very similar to the budget Harrell saw through to completion before leaving office as Council President at the end of 2019. Federal stimulus and the new JumpStart payroll tax, which hasn’t actually begun to be collected yet, largely account for that quick rebound.

UPDATE 11/8/2021 11:33 AM: As yet another reminder that recovery won’t be a smooth ride, the Seattle City Council got news Monday morning that they’ll have about $20 million less than expected to work with in 2022. Budget chair Teresa Mosqueda shared the update in the council’s morning briefing session and said the downgraded revenue estimate will need to be handled in the balancing package due later this week.

Still, overall stronger revenue estimates mean the city departments are largely getting back to normal: Seattle Parks and Recreation, for example, will be reallocating money back to redeveloping new sites for future parks, and the Seattle Public Library will be looking to add longer operating hours that were promised to voters as part of the last library levy in 2019.

As Mayor-elect Harrell promises to focus on bolstering the city’s police force, the proposed budget for the Seattle Police Department is essentially flat compared to 2021, despite a big shift of personnel out of the department: Parking Enforcement Officers have been shifted to the Seattle Department of Transportation and 911 operators will be working under the new Community Safety and Communications Center (CSCC).

Mayor Durkan proposed adding a net of 35 new police officers in next year’s budget, something that may end up being modified by the time the budget is adopted by the City Council. Her budget also allocated money toward hiring bonuses, a long-time goal that has been stymied by the council, and even went so far as to use her emergency powers to get those bonuses rolling sooner.

Next year also marks the transition of all of the City’s homelessness service contracts away from its direct control, to the King County Regional Homelessness Authority. With that transfer, the City loses its ability to dictate that money for homelessness services in Seattle is spent in exactly the way it wants. The KCRHA is hoping to receive funding to set up a new shelter downtown for people living unsheltered who suffer from behavioral issues. That would work in tandem with Mayor-elect Harrell’s pledge to build 2,000 units of housing in his first year in office, which could include shelter beds.

In terms of city streets, the budget for the Seattle Department of Transportation’s budget is fairly stable, with big-ticket projects like the RapidRide G line and the repair of the West Seattle bridge, scheduled to reopen in mid-2022, taking center stage. As several members of the City Council seek to boost the department’s spending on bridge maintenance citywide, the department is being allocated an additional $5.2 million that should allow it to complete some key projects.

Durkan’s budget would also restart work on the Center City Connector streetcar project, which has been on ice since 2018. The long-planned streetcar would link the First Hill Streetcar to the South Lake Union line in a dedicated lane along 1st Ave. After scrutinizing the project, Durkan announced her support for completing the project but the next mayor will need to prioritize finding the full funding for the project, which was last estimated to be around $286 million. Several councilmembers have proposed diverting the money to restart the project for other uses.

Some of the high profile amendments proposed by councilmembers include:

  • Public bathrooms: Another try to add public restrooms downtown. $2 million proposed by Councilmember Tammy Morales would add four public restrooms in areas where high concentrations of people are living unhoused, which could include areas close to or within Capitol Hill.
  • A plan to phase out gas leaf blowers: A study proposed by Councilmember Alex Pedersen would request Seattle Parks work with other departments to develop a plan to phase out gas leaf blowers at city properties and study a buy-back program for privately owned gas leaf blowers.
  • Accelerating conversion of homes away from heating oil: Around 1,000 homes could be converted from oil heat to electric heat pumps with an additional $13 million to the program proposed by D3 Councilmember Kshama Sawant.
  • Additional funding to address mental health via a Mobile Crisis Team: This amendment sponsored by Councilmembers Strauss, Herbold, and Lewis would expand the existing team of mental health professionals who act as first responders as an alternative to armed police.
  • Funding to fully develop a street dining pilot in Ballard along Ballard Ave NW: Councilmember Dan Strauss, sponsoring this amendment, is hopeful that permanent Ballard Ave street dining improvements can become a model for the rest of the city to follow, and could influence the design of future Capitol Hill street dining spaces like 11th Avenue in front of Chophouse Row.
  • ‘Home Zones’: Additional funding for the Seattle Department of Transportation to roll out “home zones” in neighborhoods around the city that are lacking separated sidewalks. Already being piloted in some neighborhoods, these coordinated traffic calming strategies act a lot like the Stay Healthy Streets along E Columbia Street and 22nd Ave.

At the end of this week, we’ll know which amendments survived after the City Council hears from the public in a dedicated public hearing Wednesday night starting at 5:30 PM. They are expected to formally vote on the entire budget on the Monday before Thanksgiving.

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CD Born n Raised
CD Born n Raised
2 years ago

Ready to protest Harrell all day if the sweeps start. It’s a joke of a process. Just pushing people around to new parts of town with no real solution in place. A joke.

Jeff
Jeff
2 years ago

Agree but not sure how constructive a protest will be. The voting population is clearly not on your side. You might be better off getting more people, especially young people, interested in local politics and elections.

Sipa
Sipa
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

Less than 20% of voters 18-24 returned their ballots, so i would pretty much give up on the young people.

CD Born n Raised
CD Born n Raised
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

I really don’t care that the population hates poor people. I will protest. And many will join. Not everyone has the same opportunities.

Jeff
Jeff
2 years ago

So why aren’t you protesting now. Sweeps are happening. The area around the Seattle Underground was swept a week ago. Pretty sure given the stabbing at Seven Hills park, that one will be swept next. Better get out there now and start protesting.

Not sure how many will join though.

Born on CapHill
Born on CapHill
2 years ago

Can you please stop with the exaggerated false labels to further your narrative, it’s very FOX news like. Just because someone has a different opinion from you of how to approach a problem does not mean they “hate poor people” or are “anti-houseless”. Your exaggerated name calling is certainly not helping your cause and serves to further alienate people from it. 

YoungFogey
YoungFogey
2 years ago

Then for goodness’ sake spend your energy on programs that help further equality and equity. Hating “the other side” does none of that.

CD Born n Raised
CD Born n Raised
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

Annnnnd with the new results it shows the race was a lot tighter and closer than people thought. Shame on King County not just waiting to release when all the votes are counted.

Jeff
Jeff
2 years ago

You need to get some perspective. Gonzalez lost the mayoral election by a huge margin. You may think that the city attorney election was close but look at the candidates, NTK lost to a republican. We haven’t elected a candidate who identified as a republican for at least 3 decades. Progressives ousted Pete Holmes and in turn lost a seat to a person who is even less progressive to the incumbent.

Progressive only have one election result worth celebrating, which is Mosqueda’s. To me, that’s a depressing state of affairs because it means we’ll basically be living under a Durkan-esque administration who will take no action other than “looking at the numbers and doing more research” for another 4 years.

YoungFogey
YoungFogey
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

While I agree with a lot you said, I can’t quite get over this:

To me, that’s a depressing state of affairs because it means we’ll basically be living under a Durkan-esque administration who will take no action other than “looking at the numbers and doing more research” for another 4 years.

What happened under Durkan’s “reign” wasn’t entirely her doing, a lot of what was accomplished (and not) was due to opposition by the council and other forces. Just saying…

Regardless of who’s in power around here, we need to press for more accountability and action by the actual administration, whether it’s the city, county, state or country, and figure out how to enact real change. What the administration was/is really good at is to punt responsibility to external agencies who won’t do anything that isn’t in their own interest of getting money out of the system.

John J
John J
2 years ago

Harrell is up by 45k votes right now https://www.king5.com/elections

59% vs 41%. That’s not tight and close at all.

SeattleCitizen
SeattleCitizen
2 years ago

And others of us will be protesting if there are not sweeps. Shelter refusal ought not be an option. There should be ZERO tents on greenbelts and parks. Perhaps private backyards or the spare couch of folks like CD Born n Raised. Not in our park and not on our roads. Full stop.

Build barracks, no-frills, no drugs, no stolen stuff. Those who can’t or won’t abide can move on, just as most of the criminal homeless element moved to our town due to our intolerable tolerance.

CD Born n Raised
CD Born n Raised
2 years ago
Reply to  SeattleCitizen

Okay, sure. I doubt that. The anti-houseless don’t really like to get off from a couch. They just complain from Reddit or on blogs. I’ll believe when I see it.

JCW
JCW
2 years ago

Yep. Just sit there on the couch and complain on Reddit, blogs, and… vote overwhelmingly against anti-sweep candidates. Play in the street all you want, but who’s approach is more effective?

YoungFogey
YoungFogey
2 years ago

And what exactly is it that you’re doing to change things? Can’t we all agree that nobody should really live in such conditions? On top of that being a nuisance to everyone who wants to use parks and greenbelts (there, I said it), it really isn’t that much of a favour to the HOMEless (emphasis on home on purpose – what is it with those silly word games? A house is a home, not every home is a house.) to just let them wallow in their own misery. You really can’t be that oblivious and anti-human … sigh

Park neighbor
Park neighbor
2 years ago

The acti-rad Seattle City Council’s approach of giving drug addicts the choice between going to a congregate shelter or pitching a tent indefinitely in a park or anywhere they like has been a joke of process and is not a real solution. Rather it has concentrated homeless people from across the country in Seattle, taken resources away from helping Seattle residents that need a helping hand, perpetuated addiction, made parks unusable, hurt local business, contributed to a surge in crime and disorder that has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color, and lead to a backlash against the progressive movement that has swept Republicans into office. Most Seattle voters including progressives rejected the status quo failed policies of the radical ideologues. A 24-point margin is a landslide and mandate for change.

YoungFogey
YoungFogey
2 years ago
Reply to  Park neighbor

Wholeheartedly agree with this. People need help. Letting them camp anywhere without consequences is not that, and is as you said what pushes folks towards the more conservative side of things (I’d personally shy away from calling that a Republican swing).

Below Broadway
Below Broadway
2 years ago

Did the election result not show anything? Protests made people less supportive of progressives’ positions. People have the awareness that progressives helped make the situation we’re in now. Keep reminding them of it by protesting, they’ll probably keep voting for more anti-progressive candidates.

YoungFogey
YoungFogey
2 years ago

I don’t know what it takes to (and excuse my language) get your proverbial head out of your backside but can we get real here for a change?! We’re not about pushing people around! I think the majority around here can agree on that those folks need help. As in a safe, warm and somewhat permanent place to live. And then some. But yes that does include that they can not be allowed to live in situations where gas cylinders go off and destroy half a city park (I’ve seen it) or they defecate in the middle of the street! Instead of calling people names, spend your energy on real change.

TaxQuestions
TaxQuestions
2 years ago

It would be great to get some detail on exactly how much the federal stimulus and the upcoming jumpstart tax are contributing, and how much below “normal” the budget would otherwise have to be.

Caphiller
Caphiller
2 years ago

I certainly hope that the Ballard Ave and 11th Ave/chophouse row outdoor dining and car-free areas become permanent. Great to see progress being made on making a city just a little more walkable and less car dominated.