Post navigation

Prev: (02/21/22) | Next: (02/22/22)

City Council to vote on Sawant’s bid to extend Seattle’s pandemic eviction moratorium — UPDATE: Rejected

The City Council will decide Tuesday whether to adopt a resolution brought by District 3 representative Kshama Sawant that would legally change the date the city’s prohibition on residential evictions end in Seattle.

UPDATE 4:25 PM: Following council president Debora Juarez’s recitation of two years of passed legislation involving pandemic renter protections, the body rejected the Sawant resolution in a 3-5 vote. Only Teresa Mosqueda and Lisa Herbold joined Sawant in yes votes on the extension. Tammy Morales was not present for the vote.

The rejection followed an attempt at compromise in sorting out an extension on the city’s eviction restrictions as Herbold proposed an amendment that would have extended the restrictions only through April 30th. But that path was rejected with Sawant joining the “no” voters setting up the vote rejecting her proposed longer extension. Before the final vote, Sawant thanked the dozens of speakers who had commented in favor of the resolution and told the council the rejection would be part of a spike in evictions after February 28th.

Original report: The move would reset the clock on Mayor Bruce Harrell’s plan to end the restrictions on February 28th leaving residential tenants behind on their rent around six months more of pandemic protections. Commercial tenants, meanwhile, will only have their own negotiating skills to fall back on.

Sawant’s resolution would modify the civil emergency order that is the legal framework for the restrictions to be in effect “until the termination of the COVID civil emergency” which was proclaimed on March 3, 2020 and “affirmed and modified” previously via resolution.

Sawant is calling on supporters to speak out in support of the extension. “If the City Council does not vote yes on our resolution to extend the COVID-19 pandemic eviction moratorium, it will result in a spate of evictions and homelessness,” she said in an email to supporters.

Her office cites new census reporting and says 132,000 households in the Seattle-metro area are behind on rent.

“Unless we fight back, the Democrats on the City Council are prepared to join Mayor Harrell in evicting tens of thousands of struggling renters and working-class families,” Sawant writes. “The families and renters facing eviction are disproportionately Black, Indigenous, and people of color.”

The Seattle City Council meets Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 2:00 PM
Remote Meeting. Call 253-215-8782; Meeting ID: 586 416 9164; or
Seattle Channel online.

The full proposed resolution is below.

asd

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Questionsquestions
Questionsquestions
2 years ago

Have other cities with expiring eviction moratoriums seen a huge spike in homelessness or eviction proceedings? Her stat of 120,000 behind in their rent seems high for a city our size.

jonc
jonc
2 years ago

It’s 132,000 for Seattle metro, and it’s based on a report by the Census Bureau.

C_Kathes
C_Kathes
2 years ago

That figure is for the Seattle metro area, which (I’m guessing) includes King, Pierce, Snohomish and Kitsap counties.

Glenn
Glenn
2 years ago

You can’t evict anyone from November to March. You can’t evict anyone associated in any way with education during the educational year (about ten months). You can’t evict anyone for six months after this moratorium ends (so September 1). There will be no significant spike in evictions.

Theresa
Theresa
2 years ago
Reply to  Glenn

Why can’t you evict 6 months after March 1?

District13tribute
District13tribute
2 years ago

Sawant could have had an extension through April however she voted against it to maintain ideological purity. Rather than taking a small win and continuing to work for something better she tossed those she was supposedly fighting for aside. That sort of political calculation makes me think this was more about PR for her and SA than about actually helping people. I really don’t understand why people think she cares about anything but her own brand.

kermit
kermit
2 years ago

So, what else is new? Sawant has always been all about herself and her far-left ideology.

Little Saigon Resident
Little Saigon Resident
2 years ago
Reply to  kermit

She wants to force people onto the streets so she can yell “CAPITALISM!!!”.