Post navigation

Prev: (10/13/22) | Next: (10/13/22)

Should Washington fight the Bolt Creek Fire to protect Seattle’s air? — UPDATE


 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 
We may be breathing in the last smoky days of 2022 on Capitol Hill but get used to them. Seattle is seeing more unhealthy air than ever — and state fire suppression efforts don’t prioritize air quality.

Meanwhile, as much as the smoke and haze is a concern, Seattle also now has too many days when the bad air has nothing to do with wind currents and burning forests in places like Skykomish.

Recent measurements from IQAir show Seattle logging more than twice the allowable number of days with unhealthy air, according to US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines.

Those bad air days fall into two categories — half of them, IQAir says, are due to particulate matter in the air from events like longer, more intense wildfires.

The Washington Department of Natural Resources which manages state fire suppression efforts including controlled forest burning says the response to the Bolt Creek Fire which has dragged on due to a historically dry October is by the books despite the wildfire’s impact on air quality around the more densely populated areas of Puget Sound.

A DNR spokesperson tells CHS the response strategy comes down to suppressing a fire in a remote area where homes and property around Skykomish are not threatened.

“Over half of the fire is burning into roadless areas in the Wildsky Wilderness with very steep ground,” the DNR said in a statement. “This portion of the fire is producing most of the smoke. It is unsafe to put firefighters into these steep and remote areas. The firefighters are diligently working to keep the fire from burning homes or impacting critical infrastructure, such as the railroad, powerlines, and Highway 2. Even in these areas, there are cliffs and extremely steep slopes that are not safe for firefighters and have continued to bring trees over the highway.”

When winds blow from the east, DNR says,” the smoke moves west towards the I-5 corridor causing the poor air quality.”

That strategy means state crews were reduced on the Bolt Creek response as threats to homes and the highway were reduced. At its height, around 450 people were fighting the fire when it threatened Highway 2 and nearby homes. Currently, around 225 are assigned to the fire, DNR says.

From the point of view of the state’s fire suppression efforts, the strategy has been a success with the Bolt Creek fire now “burned up to containment lines on its southern edge” and “largely burned out against these firelines,” DNR says.

As of Monday, October 10th, the fire was an estimated 13,278 acres and 36% contained. Officials estimate full containment will take the rest of the month — much of it achieved by letting the flames burn out  — or rain that could arrive after next week. Nearby residents have endured closed roads and repeated evacuations.

In the meantime, hundreds of thousands of people in cities around the Puget Sound including Seattle are living through another smoke season. CHS reported here in mid-September on the arrival of unhealthy air quality levels in Seattle from the Bolt Creek smoke.

The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, the agency created to manage air quality in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties — “home to more than 4.1 million people, over half the state’s population,” PSCAA boasts — tells CHS its purview doesn’t include influencing the state’s fire suppression response and a spokesperson said the agency at this time has not jurisdiction over fire and emergency management.

The more frequent air alerts are new. Prior to about five years ago, Seattle met federal guidelines for the allowable number of unhealthy days in both the particulate category — and the other category of air quality you should be concerned about even when smoke season ends.

Measurements show Seattle also now registers more than twice as many unhealthy high ozone days. That air quality measurement is driven by factors including emissions and greenhouse gases. A growing population, increased development, industrial emissions, and ongoing use of fossil fuels for motor vehicles are to blame. Seattle officials have taken a “2/3 cars, 1/3 development and industry” approach to the problem with a focus on public transit and less driving joining other environmental strategies in the Seattle Climate Action plan. Officials will also — for the first time — incorporate climate change factors as Seattle sets about updating its comprehensive growth plan and moves away from its old “urban village” strategy. City Hall’s own footprint is being adjusted with a transition away from fossil fuels and a move to prepare all city-owned buildings to run on clean energy by 2035.

Meanwhile, those seven or more days a year with unhealthy wildfire smoke air are likely to continue — terrible twins to those seven or more days a year with unhealthy ozone levels.

Gov. Jay Inslee’s office says more needs to be done to strengthen the state’s wildfire response including “ensuring we have adequate funds from the Legislature for the resources to react to fires and to proactively manage forest health to reduce the risk of additional intense “wildfires,” a spokesperson tells CHS.

“Long-term, we must continue reducing greenhouse gas emissions to fight climate change,” the Inslee spokesperson said. “Climate change is absolutely contributing to the record intensity of wildfires we’ve seen more of in the 21st Century.”

The DNR says the funding and resources are being used to both build up the state’s ability to quickly suppress incidents while also doing more to make forests less susceptible to wildfire including controlled burning. Those investments are key to reducing “catastrophic fires” but also addressing concerns about smoke and air quality, DNR says.

For Seattle this October, rain is finally in the forecast — but that should come closer to Halloween, of course. Sunday is predicted to bring another day of 80 F temperatures in the city. If it happens, the National Weather Service says it would be the latest on record in Seattle. In the last 100 days, 77 have been above normal in Seattle, the NWS says.

Out near Skykomish, the Bolt Creek Fire still burns and is still pumping out smoke. It is just blowing in another direction.

“The fire is still a threat and will remain so until falls rains are sufficient to extinguish the fire,” the DNR says.

UPDATE 10/17/2022 9:20 AM: This CHS report examines some of the details in the “should” around fighting fires like Bolt Creek. After a very smoky weekend around the Puget Sound, wildfire expert and host of the Life with Fire podcast Amanda Monthei is one voice sharing details of how it is being fought and why.

We recommend reading the whole @amonthei thread in which Monthei, who says she worked in public information for the state’s Bolt Creek Fire response earlier this year, discusses the strategy employed along Highway 2, why fires like this need to burn, and, importantly, what tradeoffs these kinds of decisions means for the Puget Sound including Seattle and the area’s many communities vulnerable to what she says will likely be many years of bad and dangerous summer air:

CHS is planning to talk with Monthei more about her thoughts. Stay tuned.

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sawant Supporter
Sawant Supporter
1 year ago

Adopt the Oregon tax structure and open a state fire department. This is a yearly thing now. Arson or not, it should be expected because of all the coal rolling trucks on the road contributing to climate change.

d4l3d
d4l3d
1 year ago

So ultimately we’re relying on the local climate hobbled by climate change to resolve a problem caused by climate change because it’s more difficult. Well, who could have predicted that?. Thankfully, no property will suffer.
(I live in a building where so many people succumbing to this.)

gary
gary
1 year ago

the risky roads is not an excuse when aerial firefighting exists. come on.

Old&Grizzled
Old&Grizzled
1 year ago
Reply to  gary

Nope. Aerial firefighting doesn’t actually exist. Air tankers (sometimes misnamed “fire bombers”) and helicopters don’t EVER put a fire out. They just slow it so the firefighters on the ground nearby can capitalize on a cooled fire edge and put it out. Do that in the back country of the western cascades, and you’re going to kill firefighters (it’s already happened on a similar forest in Oregon this year).

Hey
Hey
1 year ago
Reply to  Old&Grizzled

Okay well if it slows it down then let’s use it this slow it down and let’s have proper coordination so the aerial team knows where the on the ground firefighters are. There’s a reason it’s used

Yes?
Yes?
1 year ago

Since this now seems to be a yearly occurrence, I’d like to see the city do something, whether it be fighting the fire or requiring building developers to meet a standard of smoke-proof buildings. I don’t claim to have any knowledge of this kind of thing, I just know that it’s frustrating to read our local news and weather forecasters downplaying the smoke while I’m literally in my house with three air purifiers going, sleeping in the basement to avoid the bad air upstairs, hacking my lungs out, and dealing with a sick indoor animal who also seems to be affected by the air quality. It sucks, yet to hear the weather people talk about it, we should all be so grateful for these beautiful warm days.

Lisa K
Lisa K
1 year ago
Reply to  Yes?

you said everything I was thinking.

Neighbor
Neighbor
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa K

X 2. As a parent it’s especially frustrating watching sports continue unless AQI is above 150…and I feel the media’s underplaying of the risks supports this

Jeff fisher
Jeff fisher
1 year ago
Reply to  Yes?

I think modern air tightness standards already do the ‘smoke proof house’ thing pretty well.

Just have to have some good filters either in the HVAC system or separately.

Jeff fisher
Jeff fisher
1 year ago
Reply to  Yes?

Might be worth trying to find big air leaks in your home. Can get professionals to do it, but you might also find big problems on your own. Wait for a very cold day this winter and just go hunting for drafts.

Harrison
Harrison
1 year ago

This piece has a clickbaity headline and then does *nothing* in the body to answer the question in the title. Is it actually feasible at all to put the fire out? Did you find anyone with expertise who thought it was doable? If not, it’s not really a question and shouldn’t be the headline.

I love and respect this blog a lot, but IMO this is a bad look for you.

Old&Grizzled
Old&Grizzled
1 year ago
Reply to  Harrison

Totally can’t be done. I’ve been a wildland firefighter for over 3 decades, and trying to put a line around that fire is literally impossible (firefighting on cliff faces just isn’t a thing), and would have a high probability of catastrophic injury or death for the firefighters asked to take that risk (for little more than minimum wage by the way).

Before you ask, air tankers and helicopters can’t do it either. They are critical for slowing fire in the right circumstances, but on the ground firefighters MUST be on site to capitalize on it before it dries out.

breathing bad air
breathing bad air
1 year ago

Thank you so much for raising this question! It is not ok that there has been absolutely no attention to mitigating the effects of the fire on the air quality and health of a huge metro area! That is reason enough to do fly-overs with fire suppressants, or whatever can be done, at any cost. Please keep pressing on this, and thank you again.

Hillery
Hillery
1 year ago

What? How shocking. Red tape Washington

Urbanist
Urbanist
1 year ago

No

Glenn
Glenn
1 year ago

Extremely informative to read comments from most here downplaying the risk to firefighters and ignoring the difficulties inherent in fighting a fire of this nature. Maybe you all didn’t get it the first time. People would be put at undue risk to try to contain this fire one hundred percent. I’d like to drop some of you out n the woods with an axe and a heat shield for awhile just to shut you up. Urban bias anyone?

Bob Bennett
Bob Bennett
1 year ago

The article is disappointing as it does not address root issue of whether this fire that is literally pouring a river of toxic air into a major metro area can be mitigated somehow. I am flummoxed by the lack of media coverage about this major health issue. WA. DNR needs a priority realignment becuz long term exposure to this polluted air is bad for plants, animals and humans. I am not naive enough to assume Bolt Creek can be put out w the wave of a hand but literally backing off on containment when DNR is fully funded is frustrating and unhealthy for millions.

Baba Yaga
Baba Yaga
1 year ago

On the one hand, who am I to question the first responders on the ground? I’m not out there fighting the fire, and if they say this is the best course of action I tend to believe them. Remember folks, firefighters are the good guys.

I have also been humbled to learn during this smoke season that I am one of the “unusually sensitive” people they warn to minimize outdoor activities when the AQI is moderate. I have to keep all my windows shut, run air purifiers, use my inhaler daily, and mask when outside or else my (typically mild) asthma will shut down my breathing.

I typically preserve my sanity by hiking, walking, biking…but I am just tired of doing all of that wearing an N95. A much needed camping trip was canceled. So mentally, this hasn’t been great either…but it’s still a small sacrifice.

The government agency response and communication is what I’m interested in right now. For instance, this kind of sustained smoke is dangerous for everybody. Yet kids are still going to soccer practice and I sincerely doubt there’s any extra assistance for the unhoused who have no respite from the bad air.

You need to check four different agency’s feeds to get the full picture of the fire status…that doesn’t seem right. With the current messaging, the public has been led to believe that firefighting has ceased due to bad terrain, except for crucial roads and town structures. Yet, look at the 10/10/2022 report on InciWeb and it clearly states they did several air drops over the weekend. I think the public would like to know that! Something is being done but it gets hidden in these little reports.

Brian Aker
Brian Aker
1 year ago
Reply to  Baba Yaga

The terms used by AirNow/EPA are misleading. For instance, “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups” covers all children and teenagers.
Despite complaints to the Seattle Youth Soccer Association, they continue to set games and practices at levels that AirNow/EPA/Washington Health Department says is unhealthy. ( For youth the recommended levels are set at < 101 )
They are far from the only group in the city that is ignoring the health warnings about the current levels of air pollution.
DeUnhealthy for Sensitive GroupsUnhealthy for Sensitive Groups”

hbb
hbb
1 year ago

The ignorance of the realities of wildland firefighting in this article and some of the comments is pretty amazing. This is a 13,000 acre fire that is largely in steep, inaccessible terrain. Even if we had all the resources of, say, CalFire, it would not be extinguished. Only fall rains can accomplish that.

Sawant Supporter
Sawant Supporter
1 year ago
Reply to  hbb

Calfire has gotten more acreage and even steeper hills extinguished in way less time and has the same rain issues. I call BS.

hbb
hbb
1 year ago

I can’t find any examples of that in CalFire’s incident database (https://www.fire.ca.gov/stats-events/). Did you have a specific incident in mind?

Kathy
Kathy
1 year ago

Stop burning fossil fuels. If you don’t do this, you’ve no right to complain about what is happening to our planet and what our planet is doing to us. If you are one of the many freight or passenger drivers complaining about the city doing anything to improve bike infrastructure in Seattle, take a good look in the mirror, you know who you are. After all the rhetoric we get from our leaders about climate pledges, why are still talking about needing to get city facilities off of fossil fuels? It should have been done long ago.

donewithfire
donewithfire
1 year ago

So we can put a man on the moon and clone rich peoples dogs multiple times but we cant put out a fire? Yah i dont believe that, this country has the largest funded military in the world and your telling me that no one can do a single thing about this fire? Please, what BS.
If those in charge where breathing this air and dieing of headaches, lung issues like we where while also having zero access to housing with expensive rich folk filters you get your a$$ that fire would be out.

Madison Gloomknight
Madison Gloomknight
1 year ago

So, basically were just waiting for the fire to stop on its own? if that’s the case what is Fire Fighters for?

Edward
Edward
1 year ago

As others have mentioned, these types of comments show laypeople’s ignorance on the topic.

“were just waiting for the fire to stop on its own”

Unless it’s a small fire immediately affecting civilian infrastructure, that’s been the strategy for a long time now. You just didn’t know that, because it worked.

Paul
Paul
1 year ago

Bravo to the state for allowing nature to do what natures needs to do in order to maintain balance! They are using resources to protect homes and critical infrastructure but allowing nature to take its course. So what that we need to wear a mask and deal with a smell for a few days. Take the money we would be wasting on those extra fire resources and use it for medical stations to help the effected by the smoke. But let us try to allow nature to balance itself. That is best for our climate and future.

j z
j z
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul

“Letting nature take its course” sounds nice but the Bolt Creek Fire was caused by people.

DLK
DLK
1 year ago

Even when the wildfires are out, I have to constantly endure the smoke pollution of all my neighbors who feel a need to burn things every day..
either in a fire pit or in their fireplace. Thousands of people all around me lighting up smoky PNW softwoods(which are damp=extra smoky in cool seasons) just for fun or ambience. No one talks about this. The nearby apartment complex of over 500 units has fireplaces in each one, often burning “environmentally friendly” logs that are made of petrochemical wax and “recycled post consumer” who knows what.I get a really bad headache from THAT air. I often feel trapped with no where to run….staring out the window of my fully filtered house…
Wish I could just breathe the beautiful air that the Doug firs give me…..

Sarah
Sarah
1 year ago
Reply to  DLK

Same here, except I don’t have a furnace with filter. Ductless mini splits don’t remove particulates. I’m surrounded by homes where people burn trash in their fireplace all day long throughout the winter. Morons

COUGH COUGH
COUGH COUGH
1 year ago

We can argue whether the fire management strategy was flawed, but I think we can all agree that communication around this month-long event has been terrible, particularly at higher levels of state government. It’s done a disservice to the people affected by the fire (whether nearby or via the month-plus air quality crisis for four million people) and a disservice to the people working the fire, as it’s clear the rationale for the decisions made are not widely understood, leading people to fill that information gap with criticism.

This isn’t considered a large fire either as I understand it (and granted I may not understand it), but I think it’s going to resonate in policy circles in this state for a long time.

Nice job CHSB
Nice job CHSB
1 year ago

Someone pointed to this site for this article providing good coverage of this situation. Thank you for reporting the real story that gets to the core issues regarding the Bolt Creek Fire — which other Seattle media have really failed to do. Bookmarked.

Would love to see some quotes from up the chain from Hilary Franz or Jay Inslee to get a sense of whether they’re cognizant of the impact on the population.

Susan Helf
Susan Helf
1 year ago

How many “excess” deaths will be caused by letting the Bolt Creek fire burn itself out? How many elderly people with asthma, heart disease and other ailments will end up in the hospital because of the fire? How many children will suffer damaged lungs by playing outdoors in this toxic cloud? Letting a fire burn in a remote area far from a metropolitan area may make sense. But allowing this smoke to continue to sicken millions of people for six weeks is terrible public policy. It’s especially bad that the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency has no power to regulate this disgusting practice.

Rec
Rec
1 year ago

“Should Washington fight the Bolt Creek Fire to protect Seattle’s air?”
Wow! So if Seattle’s air is fine, then let the remainder of rural Washington suffer. Seattlites really need to get past themselves and think about the rest of Washington’s citizens and their needs too.

Ann
Ann
1 year ago

In early 2020, there was a major wind event that went through this area and blew massive amounts of trees down. If you remember, Skykomish was without power for at least a week, maybe even longer. The state only cuts back trees, so they are not hanging over the roadway and has never really maintained the forest areas so I’m sure there is a lot of downed timber. Arson isn’t climate change. I’m not sure why the DNR thought it was a good idea to let it burn to the edge of Hwy 2. There aren’t many options available to get to the East side of the state. I’m pretty sure there has been a huge financial impact to many businesses that rely on tourism during the fall and the continual closing so the state can do the maintenance is getting old. Maybe do a little more firefighting before it reaches a major highway instead of after the fact. They have the equipment and a water source to do so.

Sawant Supporter
Sawant Supporter
1 year ago
Reply to  Ann

There are tons of fires yearly. Arson or not, fossil fuel burning still contribute to changing weather pattern that prevent the much needed rain that could aid this fire.

Tom
Tom
1 year ago

Welcome to Mordor.

Asthma
Asthma
1 year ago

The smoke is unbearable and nothing is being done. They need to clean house at DNR starting at the top, this is public health malpractice.

Neighbor
Neighbor
1 year ago

Most wild fires are caused by humans. Let’s focus on preventing them in the first place. How about life in prison without parole for anyone convicted of causing a wildfire especially one of this magnitude.