This election season’s battle for the open seat to represent the 43rd District in the Washington House of Representatives has many of the markings of modern political warfare — extreme polarization over social issues and public safety, slick attack ads with the fingerprints of political think tanks all over them, and back and forth accusations tying the opposition to larger, overarching threats to the country and Democracy as we know it.
But as the campaign draws closer to November 5th’s Election Day, the fight was playing out over the weekend with simpler battles over stolen campaign signs and the neighborhood farmers market.
Sunday, Shaun Scott and opponent Andrea Suarez told CHS that both campaigns were confident that theyβd come out on top.
Scott has regularly canvassed at the Capitol Hill Farmers Market since the start of his campaign, which has amounted to about 24 visits, he said. Attending the market has allowed the candidate to talk with many voters who are more challenging to reach through traditional campaigning methods like door-knocking. When speaking with neighborhood residents, the primary concern Scott says he hears is the need to pass the rent stabilization bill, House Bill 2114, which will be re-introduced next session and would, in part, limit rent and fee increases.
- For Capitol Hill and Central District neighborhoods, SPDβs research shows the top public safety concern isβ¦ traffic safety
- Capitol Hill safety issues go viral in candidateβs tour with Broadway business owner
- Mapping results from the primary shows familiar borders as Woo and Rinck battle for Seattle City Council Position 8
- More…
βRenters are one of the most disenfranchised groups that we have in our state, because we have a state legislature that is dominated by property holders, homeowners, landlords, and as a result, the interests of renters and working people are not reflected in our state government and itβs decisions,β Scott told CHS.
While acknowledging the skyrocketing of rental prices, Suarez holds different views on the efficacy of rental caps.
βCapping rent at three percent chases landlords right out of the state, turning what should be affordable rental units into expensive AirBnBs. This logic doesnβt workβit didnβt work in San Francisco, in New Yorkβit doesnβt work,β Suarez tells CHS.
Suarez said her appearance at the market Sunday was delayed by a search for piles of her campaign signs she said were taken down and stashed near dumpsters. It is a regular occurence. Her campaign has been busy distributing the signs across the 43rd District which stretches across parts of First Hill, Capitol Hill, South Lake Union, Washington Park, Madison Park, Eastlake, Montlake, Portage Bay, Wallingford, Fremont, the University District including the University of Washington campus, Green Lake, and areas of Phinney Ridge and Ravenna.
The sign removal — or stealing, depending on who you ask — is the latest controversy Suarez has courted on social media where the candidate has made her efforts to recover signs a center of her latest updates. Other recent posts include conversations with Capitol Hill business owners including longtime Broadway fixture Carl Medeiros owner of The New York Xchange and several area retail ventures over the years.
Another Suarez video has caused a bigger stir. The Suarez campaign is featuring an attack ad criticizing Scott’s past efforts with the Defund SPD movement produced by Discovery Institute-backed Seattle journalist Jonathan Choe. Suarez reported the expenditure as a $1,200 donation from Choe who has renewed his career pursuing anti-Seattle stories for the religious conservative think tank.
Suarez, calling Choe a friend she has known for four years, says she sees no issues with having a Discovery Institute journalist produce an advertisement for her campaign.
“I have 500 + donors- people are allowed to be involved in the political process as an individual despite their career,” she tells CHS. “Itβs their constitutional right.”
Unlike Scott, Suarez says the primary issue she has been hearing while canvassing is public safety.
Despite seeking state office, Suarez is passionate about funding the Seattle Police Department, and said that being down hundreds of officers is harming the most vulnerable Seattle residents.
βMy vision is a culture where we all respect our first respondersβour officers, our social workers, our CARE team, our firefightersβto create a culture of kindness, create a culture of accountability,β Suarez said. βIβd say, primarily, a culture shift: that not all cops are, in fact, bastards. Iβm sickened as I walk around Capitol Hill where two Black menβs lives were lost in CHOP/CHAZ, but Shaun Scott wants permanent CHOP/CHAZ. He wants to decriminalize drugs, he wants to let everybody out of jailβhe is a bonafide member of the Socialist Democratic Party.β
That last part? It’s true. Kind of. Scott is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
In her canvassing efforts, Suarez said sheβs spoken to all business owners on Broadway, 15th and 19th and that store windows have been broken while thousands of dollars of merchandise have been stolen only later to be sold on the black market.
βWhen you donβt have enough police officers, we are a no-rules playground,β Suarez said. βThis is the culture that weβre creating under past leadershipβShaun is a continuation of that faction. Itβs overβitβs new times.β
While not necessarily staying above the fray of Suarez’s increasing attacks, Scott at the market Sunday, focused mostly on policy and change.
If elected, Scott said he would work towards having the state implement a real estate excise tax (REET), which would tax massive real-estate transactions and almost double Washingtonβs investment in affordable housing.
βWe want to begin the long work of revamping our state school funding model, but in the short-term, we want to give localities the resources that they need to raise the funds that they need to prevent school closures,β Scott said.
Scott also sees differences in how he would help lead the 43rd as the repercussions of the pandemic continue.
βI would like to make sure that weβre getting ready to enter into another flu season, another COVID season, so I want us to give health clinics the resources that they need to take long-COVID seriously,β Scott said.
CHS reported here on the race for the 43rd in July as the candidates battled it out headed into the August primary. The race’s fundamentals remain the same. Scott has the support of the support of Frank Chopp, the Washington political legend and housing champion whose retirement opened the seat. AΒ lobbyist with theΒ Statewide Poverty Action NetworkΒ who narrowly lost a 2019 race to represent the University District on theΒ Seattle City Council, has focused his campaign on continuing to respond to the issues that drove the Black Lives Matters protests, and the responses to the COVID-19 crisis that forged progressive policies including the creation of a public social housing developer in Seattle.
The 43rd’s other representative Nicole Macri has also endorsed Scott as has The Stranger.
Suarez gained notoriety through the We Heart Seattle organization she started as a neighborhood clean-up and homelessness volunteer group, growing the role into her full-time job as βa bleeding heart bean counterβ shining a light on what she says is bloated government spending and waste. She has touted her connections to Republicans and conservative organizations while also maintaining that she is a big “D” candidate. The political message can be challenging. The Suarez campaign felt the most important message to display on its yard signs was, simply, βANDREA SUAREZ β DEMOCRAT.β
Her campaign is now endorsed by the Seattle Times — and the Seattle Police Officers Guild.
For Scott, the final weeks as voters are already sending in their ballots is about making sure any remaining undecideds get a view of his broad progressive legislative agenda, which he said speaks to the fact that the legislature has not been as responsive as it should have been in recent years, and which is a part of the reason why heβs running.
But the candidate is concerned that Suarez’s mud-slinging might make voters look away from the race entirely. As someone who worked as a lobbyist in Olympia for the past four years for Solid Ground, Scott expressed concerns about professionalism in this race, and said the attacks also need to be addressed so policy can come out on top.
βMy proponent has spent the last two years getting banned from a youth services homeless centerβthe YouthCare alliance center. They have a long track record of speeding in school zones, writing to judges to get parking infractions excused,β Scott says. βSheβs a candidate who compared herself to Jesus Christ when people asked if she had the required licenses to do legitimate case manager work, and so I think that the voters of our district need to have somebody thatβs prepared to lead, and somebody who has actually demonstrated the conduct required of a state lawmaker in Olympia, where youβre going to be making life or death decisions.β
Suarez says her track record should speak for itself. Accountability is love, she said, including arresting people for negative behavior and then getting them involved with recovery.
βI would be the heart — and the shift in leadership as a legislator,β Suarez said.
Find all CHS Election 2024 coverage here
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE THIS SPRING
ππ£πΌπ·π±π³πΎπππ¦πππππ»Β
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support πΒ
If you’re going to spill all the dirt about Suarez you might as well mention that Scott openly supported the October 7th massacre and his poor reputation among those who have worked for him.
This blog was in the bag for Sawant her entire tenure. It should come as no shocker that the favorable coverage continues with Comrade Scott.
We covered Sawant from the beginning to the end tighter and better than anyone in the city. And you know it. Thanks for reading through the years, Miller Playfield Turf.
CHS Kshama Sawant coverage
Sawant was good and fine during her tenure. You’re just made she supports Stein over Genocider Kamala.
Yeah I’m sure Trump will really rein in Bibi. Great job Sawant, really thinking of the little people in Palestine.
*Supports Trump
Stein or Trump? Both are idiots.
So parachute her and Stein into Gaza and let them screech through bullhorns at Israel over the border. She’s nothing but a disrupter in it for herself here. And yes, I voted for her the first time round. What a mistake that was…
When you equate Scott with Sawant, and imply him as a better choice: with not one scintilla of evidence, you have identified yourself as a bullhorn, anti-democracy, close minded, low information, mouthpiece – who cares nothing about anything of real importance: such as rule of law, public safety, good governance, consensus β¦and cares only about your grievances about being owed something. Earn it.
You deserve to live in a country with an authoritarian leader, like Sawant or Trump; but Iβm sure you could fit in.
And get a better handle or a different one because no one wants to read your opinion.
He didn’t support the massacre. He understood it. Which is the correct take. Can’t keep taking land that isn’t yours and not expect blowback.
The reason Hamas planned the massacre was because they needed to mix up the status quo. They felt like their message was losing steam and they absolutely knew the terror that was going to come to the Palestinian people. Hamas sucks in every way imaginable.
Hamas may suck, but it was Bibi and his stooges that propped them up in an effort to undermine the PLA in the West Bank. They knew exactly what they were doing and the terror that became of it, but continued with those plans to support their broader efforts of eliminating the Palestinian people.
Wasβt Suarez pretending to help homeless people βfind homesβ by creating βsafe Seattleβ and actually going in and forcibly removing homeless people? Sheβs gross and fake.
This is the NTK vs. Ann Davison race all over again. A police abolitionist vs. a person with too many uncomfortable ties to gross republicans. Looks like I’ll be writing in Frank Chopp.
Iβm curious as to why this article doesnβt mention that Suarezβs βstolenβ signs are probably illegally placed: per SMC 23.55.012, campaign signs canβt be placed on public property including street medians. At least where I live (as well as in Fremont and Wallingford), the *only* places Iβve seen Suarez signs are on public property. Whoever is removing these – maybe even someone who works for the city or SDOT – is from a legal standpoint picking up trash, like Suarez purports to do.
This ^^^
I have had multiple legally placed signs at several properties destroyed, removed and hidden, or disappeared. The same thing would always happen to my Sawant signs, and still I refrained from removing my multiple neighbors signs supporting her candidacy. That is what courtesy and respect for civility and free speech looks like.
I also saw them in front of the now-defunct Russian Consulate near Madison Park.
This is conjecture at best, and even then ALL candidates have been doing this since the dawn of time.
The only political signs I’ve seen in the public right of way on my part of Capitol Hill have been Suarez signs. Also found two more of them stuffed by someone into my trash can. The ones with the “Endorsed by the Seattle Times!” note stapled proudly onto the corner. I’m not bugged by political messages in public spaces generally but when I observed that the candidate most likely (in theory) to move people off public rights of way is also the candidate whose followers are most likely (at least on my corner of the Hill) to use public rights of way for their own purposes, I clocked that irony and made a first contribution to Scott’s campaign.
Just yesterday, I saw a Rinck sign illegally placed in Judkins Park (the actual park, not the neighborhood)… I didn’t pull it up or condemn the candidate, even though I didn’t vote for her. Remember that anyone can likely get a sign and not all of them know the rules.
Nice try at some spin regarding the theft of Suarez’s signs. The Scott minions who do this might realize that they are turning off a lot of undecided voters who will now vote for Suarez.
Scott may not be directly responsible for these thefts, but he is condoning them by staying silent about the issue.
lol at the thought that sign stealing might lean undecided candidates to vote for this hot mess.
Two awful candidates in their own way. I’ve done business with Andrea. She was not impressive in a professional setting and is a classic narc. She’ll be useless for constiuents.
Scott is an edge lord tik tok style “marxist” (I’m not sure he could even defeine his politics) that also will be useless. FFS. We deserve better.
Yes the primary system we have just allows extremist (on both sides) candidates to come forward and we are left to choose from the dreck.
It is against Seattle municipal code to put campaign signs in the right of way without the property owners consent. So no, her signs were not βstolenβ, they were illegal placed. https://www.seattle.gov/documents/Departments/SDOT/CAMs/CAM2120.pdf
Then the correct solution is to file a complaint with the city and have them remove them. If you take the signs you are stealing property and that too is a violation of city code. What you are endorsing is vigilante justice and I’m pretty sure most of the people around here would not support that for this or in other cases.
If somebody places a sign on my property, it becomes my issue and I have every right to remove or dispose of it within reason as I wish. Same as towing a car that is parked illegally in your driveway.
We are not discussing your personal property. We are discussing putting signs on public rights of way and other city property.
We do have the right to pick up trash in public spaces, in fact the city encourages it! That’s like saying it’s illegal to remove graffiti or stickers because you’re defacing someone’s art π€£
Regarding stolen campaign signs, it is obvious there has been a concerted effort to remove Ms. Saurezβs campaign signs whenever they appear. No such effort is being made to remove the Harris campaign signs I see across our District, many of which are on planting strips and medians. Candidate Scott does not seem to use campaign signs to promote his candidacy, so there is nothing to lose when your supporters go about their removal work. I have had Suarez signs on multiple sites smashed (they have wooden stakes so that takes work), removed and stuffed in bushes, and disappeared. They were all clearly posted on private property, but that seemed not to matter. To me this is a shameful suppression of political speech, but sadly that is the way the left does business in our city.
As for Candidate Scottβs suggestion that the State should institute a real estate excise tax (REET) on massive property sales, we already have one in place, and the tax rate on larger property sales was doubled to 3.78 percent a few short years ago. When combined with real estate commissions of 5/6 percent and transaction paperwork, a typical seller now loses ten percent of the sale price at close, whether they make any profit via the sale or not. In the event they have any profit they must then pay capital gains taxes. Increasing the REET yet again will only make the situation worse and push us closer to the day when developers shun Seattle as a buildable market.
I actually saw two stereo-typically looking cap hill scott supporters with an old beater pickup full of suarez signs by cal anderson on Saturday morning. Like they must have had 40 or so of her signs thrown in the bed of the truck.
I used to work campaigns, the only people that care about signs are people already voting for the candidate. they are basically just feel good things for volunteers to enjoy — and the opposite is true as well, people that do the take downs feel righteous. We certainly had some midnight runs when I was doing campaigns. It’s fun, especially for young volunteers.
but they don’t win or lose campaigns, at all.
That’s because HER campaign placed them illegally on other people’s property. There’s an entire thread on Nextdoor complaining of Suarez’s trespassing.
Nextdoor complaints you say (clutches pearls).
She admits to it below in the comments. It’s par for the course with her cleanup work, head down brute forcing efforts without taking the time to find out what is legal or not and then playing the naivete card when she gets called out. That’s fine in some instances, but when dealing with vulnerable populations or working to legislate (a pretty detailed orientated task) that’s not what I’m looking for.
Oh, boo hoo, you have to pay taxes when you sell your property valued at over $3 million. Iβm sorry life has gotten so hard for you as a seller of millions of dollars worth of real estate that has skyrocketed in value.
Unlike as suggested in the article, the reason Ms. Suarez put Democrat on her sign is to emphasize that Mr. Scott is no such thing.
You mean, to try to convince us she’s not a republican? Friggin’ Demonrats!
Simply calling yourself a Democrat is meaningless in this state because we don’t officially register into parties. Thus there’s no way to verify it. Anyone who starts off their ballot pamphlet statement with “I am a proud Democrat” but cites no previous involvement in a Democratic organization or any endorsements from known Democrats is highly suspect in my book. If she wins it won’t surprise me if she votes with Republicans on virtually everything.
I sure hope the city has enough sense not to elect another Marxist, abolish-the-police nut job.
Suarez is literally the uneducated one. Have you ever heard the two of them speak? Andrea even admits Shaun is smarter than her. Andrea is a NIMBY buffoon.
Stop.
You all donβt seem to realize that since the 2020 protests, the city has been slowly rolling out strategies specifically called for by βdefund policeβ advocacy: more behavioral specialists on the scene (rather than only cops). Funds are being diverted to additional strategies (that is what is meant by βdefund policeβ – you knew that, right?). Mayor Harrellβs CARE department – which Suarez supports – is specifically such a strategy promoted by defund police activism. Yay for small steps!
More important, Suarez has no original position on issues. When asked about education funding she said she acknowledged sheβd have a lot of learning to do on the job; yikes. Then she just parroted a Seattle Times opinion piece. Whereas Scott wrote a great piece on the history of education funding in Washington that explained why weβre in the mess we face today as well as how to start fixing it.
Who’s his proponent again?
good lord, we’re still seriously discussing rent control? this ain’t 1978 folks
I note that “rent control” (a politically-charged phrase) is now repackaged as “rent stabilization.” A sheep in wolf’s clothing….
Sorry techbros, some of us want to afford the place we grew up in
Yeah, SF and its rent control have really figured that affordable piece out. Let’s copy them.
Rent control is not the singular, controlling factor that produced the California housing market. NIMBYism, ballot initiatives producing a truly stupid system of incentives, and steady population growth are all drivers of how the Cali real estate market developed, along with some not great policies in the Bay Area cities specifically that made building new units harder. Seattle has seen literally like ten billion dollars of money go into new buildings, most of them just aren’t affordable housing, it’s all top-end “luxury” nonsense.
And Seattle adopting rent control would fix the “luxury” nonsense? How exactly?
I have met Shaun Scott, heard him speak, and read his excellent book about Seattle. Heβs extremely smart and well spoken, and heβs the only serious candidate in this race. With backing from Frank Chopp, Nicole Macri, and many others. Suarez Iβm sure is not completely incompetent, but cleaning up homeless encampments does not qualify you for the state legislature.
This ^^
Scott has the policy understanding and background to legislate at the state level. Suarez has been head down working tenaciously at this one thing in Seattle and hasn’t shown any sort of desire to brush up on other aspects prior to running for state government.
Hi Everyone, This is Andrea Suarez and thanks to those who are supporting me. I offer my cell for a conversation with anyone who wants to learn more about me. 206-850-4290.
The signs were designed and printed by an old school father – daughter union print shop off aurora. They have been making signs for decades. They worked hard to make those signs. My recovery community then built the signs, stapled the new endorsement on, placed the stickers and with pride loaded them in my truck and shared photo with family. They wanted to pay it forward and promote me because I want to fund recovery and independence vs. enable addicts to die and prolong human suffering like my opponent. Hard working union members from Local32 Plumbers and Pipefitters woke up at 4:00am and installed my signs down Madison and 23rdβ¦. they laid my sings like pipe. It was a bit much for sure. But it is them who are stripped of their hard work and pride to participate in the political process. I think about that. Somebody undid all that pride and work!
The man who complained my signs were on his property later admitted it was the roundabouts on 17th and the sidewalk grass. He claimed to me that homeowners see those areas as theirs to keep up. We worked it out and actually had a conversation.
I want to save lives, and have a clean and safe city. Shaun wants to bring safe injection sights to Washington like BC has. I have toured these areas and the human suffering and absence of hope in the air was like hell on earth.
Vote wisely.
Andrea
206-850-4290
You probably should have placed them in legal areas!
Get over yourself. Seriously.
Law and order for thee but not for me
Just because Madison and 23rd are arterials, it doesn’t mean that the planting strips aren’t the property of the home owners. You must ask first. Harris/Walz signs are by donation and so therefore they are generally on the private property of the person who donated (such as ours). But yeah, it’s always somebody else’s fault, isn’t it?
Actually⦠the planting strip next to the sidewalk in front of your home is *not* your property⦠it belongs to the city, though you are expected to maintain it.
Oh the Entitlement! Check the friggin’ eReal Property site genius. Or ask ChatGPT. This isn’t rocket science. The planting strips are part of the public right-of-way and owned by the City of Seattle. It’s public property – so NO one doesn’t need to ask your permission.
I will be voting for you because you understand that the west coast progressive approach to the drug crisis and homelessness has failed. It has greatly increased overdose deaths and suffering and decreased the quality of life in Seattle. Scott wants to double down on failed βharm reductionβ drug policies that have grown the problem and killed thousands and a homelessness approach that allows encampments to take over public spaces and destroy the environment. I honestly donβt understand how any reasonable person could support someone that advocated for abolishing the police and prisons at this point. What an absurd position to take over reforming the system to address systemic issues. I also agree with you on the grave threat of Scottβs position on drug injection sites. I have never seen a more depressing and hopeless place than the Vancouver neighborhood that was destroyed by the Insight drug site. It is a cautionary tale not a model for Seattle.
Your willful ignorance of the law is truly breathtaking. I donβt care who made the signs or that union members illegally put up campaign signs for you.
You still need the permission of an adjacent property owner to put signs in a planting strip, which you did not get before putting signs all over.
Traffic circles and medians are not permitted at all. Ever.
Your willful ignorance of public-right-of-way is truly breathtaking. It’s not illegal – Ever. And NO, your permission is neither needed nor warranted.
Also – they are signs. Signs. You can live with them for one more week. They are not hurting you. I promise.
Are you a bot? Your comments are nonsensical! It is illegal, this is a direct statement from SDOT that has already been shared in a document above…
“The Seattle Department of Transportation manages the placement of signs in the public right-of-way. Yard signs (including campaign signs) may be located in planting strips in front of private property with the consent of the occupant of that property.”
“We may issue citations to candidates and ballot issue committees for signs that have been illegally placed in the public right-of-way by their volunteers.”
Hi Andrea,
You probably don’t know me but you do know one of my friends.
You faked being a case worker to gain access to their personal files at the Orion youth center.
I just wanted to take this moment to let you know that you and your group We Heart Seattle are monsters.
I say this all sincerity:
Go fuck yourself and fuck off back to the suburbs your NIMBY ass came from.
I want to know more about this. Why was she trying to get their information? It’s just such a bizarre thing to do and then to double down on it with “I may not be a licensed social worker but I’m like, kind of almost like a social worker because I talk to people and stuff” is so wildly ignorant and arrogant
Hey Andrea, how’s Kevin Dahlgren? Looking forward to the day we hear he’s also being prosecuted in WA, you don’t get to be that big of a con artist overnight
Even if the placing of campaign signs on public property (planting strips, medians, traffic islands, etc.) is technically illegal, they are given a pass by cities and rural areas throughout the USA. Why? Because they are an important part of the democratic process and that by long-standing tradition over-rules the minor technical regulation.
Everywhere has different ordinances on this, and I think you’re making a lot of assumptions about what is public property when your out and about traveling.
Placing signs around public areas is not a an important part of the democratic process, it’s a nuisance and wasteful. Most candidates give or sell signs for them to place at their residence. Sometimes you can coordinate with a business or other property owner, but just placing a sign anywhere is nonsense.
Important parts of our democracy in public spaces are actual people canvasing, tabling, and those types of activities where people are actively out talking about democratic issues.
*you’re :)
Also, ironically you’re making a lot of assumptions about what constitutes important parts of democracy.
Nope, those are actually cornerstones of our democracy… but thank you for the grammar edits π