As Seattle hopes to help cool its streets and sidewalks against global warming by achieving 30% tree-canopy coverage across every area of the city in the next twelve years, the new stumps along Capitol Hill’s 15th Ave are an example of the challenge — and the opportunity — in the numbers.
The old Norway Maples just removed from the sidewalk along the Capitol Hill Kaiser Permanente campus were dead — and had been for years. Planted in 1977, the maples were maintained by the Seattle Department of Transportation. Coming up on 50 years later, most of the 15th Ave trees were completely dead with branches and bark falling off. A few hangers-on were in serious decline.
SDOT says it hired a contractor to remove the old maples “due to safety concerns, particularly because they were adjacent to Metro bus lines.”
SDOT says there is no evidence “porous paving contributed to the trees’ decline” as the city’s tree wells have been filled in recent years to prevent injuries to pedestrians and people using tree-lined sidewalks.
Despite the city’s ambitious goals of quickly establishing a 30% tree canopy cover, there is no plan for re-planting. But there will be a first step.
“We’re adding these locations to our queue for stump removal, which is the first step in preparing the sites for potential replanting,” a SDOT spokesperson tells CHS.
“While there isn’t a designated timeline for replacement at this point, the sites will be considered for future planting as opportunities and resources allow.”
There are hopes for more transportation levy money to help create leafier cover for the city’s sidewalks and streets. In a study funded by Washington State Department of Natural Resources Urban and Community Forestry Program, SDOT looked at four neighborhoods across Seattle including Capitol Hill’s E Olive Way area to better understand the current canopy and challenges to reaching the 30% mark in a densely populated, highly developed area.
The study found the E Olive Way neighborhoods currently measure out with around 15% canopy leaving a doubling required needed to reach the state-recommended level. The SDOT study did the work of identifying exactly how sidewalk planting across this area around E Olive Way could help the neighborhood — and how many additional trees on building properties and development are needed to reach the mark.
“With many apartment buildings and limited open space, finding room to plant trees in Capitol Hill/Olive Way is difficult. In a dense neighborhood like Capitol Hill, every new street tree requires planning and coordination,” the report on the study reads. “The city identified potential street tree planting sites using mapping analysis and on-site inspections. In addition to 105 potential street tree planting sites and 289 existing street trees, this census tract requires 196 more trees to reach the city’s goal of 30%.”
“While 105 potential street trees represent only part of what’s needed, each new street tree is progress toward our overall goal,” the report optimistically concludes.
The study includes three key barriers to adding more street trees to the area:
• Limited space: Capitol Hill/Olive Way is highly developed, leaving few open areas for new tree plantings.
• Utility conflicts: A high volume of underground pipes, overhead wires, and other utility infrastructure can limit where street trees can be planted. For example, an underground electrical vault in a planting strip would prevent planting street trees nearby.
• Pavement removal: In many locations, paved surfaces would need to be removed to create space for street trees.
It recommends changes including requiring minimum 5-foot-wide planting strips, and increased setbacks “from driveways, poles, hydrants, and other infrastructure” to leave more room for canopy. Increased setbacks bring many other challenges, of course, for a region in the midst of a perhaps never-ending housing crisis.
Part of the study also included surveying people and businesses in the area about ideas they would support to increase the area’s canopy.
You can read more about the planting study here.
SDOT, meanwhile, is gearing up to plant more trees on Capitol Hill. It recently was conducting a new survey in areas of Seattle with less than 25% canopy coverage as it pursues strategies for quickly adding new leafy areas.
Overall, the city says Capitol Hill registers with barely more than 15% coverage as of spring 2025.
SDOT says it will use the new survey results to shape is tree planting strategies.
Back on 15th, SDOT says the tree wells will soon have the old maple stumps grinded out and removed to be prepared for future plantings. Then the sites will be added to City Hall’s roster of “available planting sites” in the official street tree inventory. They could then be included in a future round of city planting as funding is made available. A neighbor like Kaiser Permanente could also step in to help the city reach its goals. CHS asked the multistate integrated managed care consortium about the trees and was referred to SDOT. Kaiser has not responded about the opportunity to help re-plant its street.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍
I just ran by these this week and saw them. They need to be replaced and Kaiser should pay for it not the city. Homeowners are required to take care of their own planting strips, why isn’t Kaiser. As a good neighbor they should want to replace the trees.
Agree! SDOT’s vague statement about re-planting sounds like it won’t happen for quite awhile, if ever. If Kaiser steps up, that might jumpstart the process.
Rules aren’t that homeowners are required to replace and maintain all trees in parking strips, SDOT still takes responsibility for trees planted by the city. According to city street tree maps, these were public trees established by the city.
It would be nice if Kaiser could step in to replace them, for sure.
The adjacent property owner of a planting strip is responsible for any trees located there. If a tree dies, a permit is required to remove it, and the City additionally mandates that it be replaced with a new tree. (City Ordinance #90047, Title 15 – Street Use Code)
Under the same ordinance, property owners are also responsible for trees originally planted by SDOT.
Enforcement by the City of Seattle is, at best, inconsistent.
Is pursuing enforcement of the city’s tree plan the best use of the City Attorney’s time? At present, the City clearly doesn’t think so.
The trees were owner by SDOT.
Check the city tree inventory, these trees and all in-between the two final numbers.
Emerald Queen Norway Maple – TRE-48183
Emerald Queen Norway Maple – TRE-48193
I think there should be a sidewalk, grass strip, bike lanes. Sans parking.
People don’t need to be dropped off or picked up from the hospital or clinics inside. Everyone is fully able-bodied and 25. I forgot.
There’s a dedicated pick-up and drop-off zone that’s ADA compliant, both accessible from 15th and 16th. Cars shouldn’t be stopping along 15th to begin with. We can ignore your comment.
Kaiser has an enormous drop off loop and 600 stall garage. They shouldn’t be encouraging street drop off.
Green roof, hello?
Don’t you mean WHITE ROOF with solar panels unless you grow a green roof!!! And all East/West streets should have the trees on the south side to cool the concrete!!!
Seattle: trees not houses.
Also Seattle: why is housing so expensive?
Land for trees is limited. 30% is impossible. Why force trees on people? Trees are for suburbs and rural areas.
If you want shade, just have covered sidewalks in some areas.
lol. You post some dumb stuff but trees being “forced” on people probably takes the cake…
Derek go back to Vegas where there aren’t any trees
You want them to put houses between the road and the sidewalk?
It’s definitely a good thing the trees died. Norway Maples have a very shallow root system. Nothing grows under them…except invasive ivy. And those shallow roots could lead to landslides once the samaras spread to hillsides. The shallow roots might also be why they died. Seattle needs to plant something with deep roots that can reach undergroup water. Preferably something native.
It was a poor choice for sure.
Agreed! Can you imagine all the damage that would have occurred from a landslide on the hillside at that location?
Nothing grows under them because the area around them is paved!
I think it is against current regulations to plant a tree in a spot like that. Maybe sdot is allowed to do it.
There is a list of trees approved for planting in the strip between street and road which are known to do less damage to streets and sidewalks. Not sure how many native trees are on the list.
That’s why I suggested grass strips and wider sidewalks with a bike lane wherever possible. To allow room away from the overhead wires etc. Also the proper trees. They don’t have to be the tallest and bushiest either. Do those at appropriate spots only. It’ll take more smaller trees to complete it.
We absolutely need more trees. And can we also replace the trees along Pine that drop spiked bombs all over the place?
Sad to see those trees go, and expect them to be replaced.
What we do NOT need (in my opinion) is more parking lots to support Kaiser. My daily travels take me past 18th & John, where Kaiser has a surface lot several blocks from their campus (and several blocks farther from other surface parking lots that seem to get regular use). As far as I can tell, this lot is seldom or never used. However, last week they rebuilt the lot to “like new” conditions! Such a waste. Why not sell it and turn it into housing, or even better, build workforce housing so Kaiser support staff (like janitors & facilities support) can afford to live near their jobs.
I live near this (and several other) Kaiser lots, and refer to them as “$10 million parking spots.” The land value on those lots has to be bonkers!!
The City also just cut down massive trees on Harvard near Aloha. They had to be close to 200 years old. Seattle has no clue how to take care of its land or the trees that occupy it. Several trees are also being allowed to die in Volunteer Park.