
When I first moved to Capitol Hill, a friend advised me that whatever I do, I should find a place with a view. Location is great, and so are a good floor plan and a super that vacuums once a week, but when mid-January rolls around, and we’re three months deep into our rainy season with another three (or four, or five, or six) months to go, it’s that view of the Space Needle and the Olympics beyond that would keep my spirits up. He was right.
At the Vertigo, located at 705 E. Republican St., a fifth-floor one-bedroom condo boasts one feature above all else: the view. Does the view disorient you, leave you dizzy, give a sense of – would you say – vertigo?
Location: 705 E. Republican St. at Boylston Ave. E., Unit # 504
Unit Size: a one-bedroom condo, originally built as a two-bedroom, at 806 sq. ft.
Team: Thomas Maloney, Gerard Beattie & Knapp (realtor)
Unit # 504 at the Vertigo
The Condo: This is a one-bedroom, top-floor unit located at the Vertigo, right down the street from the Capitol Hill library branch. Features include bamboo floors, an in-unit washer/dryer, a terrace, four large closets, a wood-burning fireplace, granite countertops in the kitchen, and new, practically unused appliances. The unit was originally built as a two-bedroom, but a few swings of the sledgehammer later, it was transformed into a one-bedroom with a massive, L-shaped living room. The southwest-facing corner unit has sweeping, uninterrupted views of the Olympic Mountains, Elliott Bay, the Space Needle, Downtown, and Mt. Rainier. The unit comes with two parking spaces. Building amenities include a small fitness room and a rooftop terrace. Monthly homeowners dues are $308.
The Backstory: Three years ago, the Vertigo, which was built in 1963, was converted from rental apartments to condos and completely renovated. The condo has sat vacant for a year-and-a-half.
The condo hit the market on February 22 with an initial asking price of $395,000. After a sluggish initial month, the asking price was reduced to $375,000, where it remains today. Maloney said that showings picked up in April, as the eligibility window for federal tax incentives was closing, but since then it has been slow.
Maloney also tells us that some windows have been replaced in the building because of water problems, but not in this unit. Of course, smart condo buyers in Seattle should always ask about water issues. It’s been a source of millions of dollars worth of lawsuits and HOA assessments over the last several years. Does this building have them? Buyers should rely on their own inspection report by a professional to get their determination of risk.
The Splash: The view, the view, the view, the view, the view. To get a sense of what a view is worth in this town, we took a look at the sales prices for this and the four units stacked directly beneath it after they were converted to condos. Each unit features a similar floorplan, though others may be considered either one- or two-bedrooms, depending on if walls were removed from the other units. The breakdown is as follows: Unit # 504: $435,000. Unit # 404: $410,000. Unit # 304: $388,000. Unit # 204: $350,000. Unit # 104: $339,000.
So, all other things being equal, the difference between the best view and the worst (which is of the covered parking area) is nearly $100,000.
The square footage is atypically large for one-bedrooms in the neighborhood, due to the fact that this unit was built as a two-bedroom. Maloney estimates that one-bedrooms average between 650 and 675 sq. ft.
The Outlook:
The asking price for this condo appears to be middle-of-the-pack for the neighborhood. Maloney said there are currently 107 one-bedroom condos for sale on the Hill, ranging from as low as $109,500 to $679,000. That this unit was originally listed at $40,000 less than the its previous sale price, and that it has been reduced by another $20,000, is disheartening, but not necessarily a surprise given the state of the economy.
How low will it go? Who thinks the asking price will be reduced below $375,000?
Are you in the market for a one-bedroom condo on the Hill? How does Unit #504 at the Vertigo compare?
What’s a view worth in this town? $100,000?
Oofah. Maybe it was the view. Or maybe it’s the unconscionable fact that it’s 53 degrees outside today when I wish it were 73. But I’m feeling dizzy, a little woozy in the head. I think it’s a case of…
See the listing here.
Side note: For those expecting a preview of Holiday Apartments, in order to do full justice to the building’s top-to-bottom renovation, we’re waiting a few more weeks to take our cameras inside in order to allow the team at Capitol Hill Housing to finish sprucing up the place.









i dont care how awesome the view is, this building is an absolute dump.
Welcome to Capitol Hill, where the developers slap some new paint on the walls of a run down apartment, call it a condo, and raise the price a couple hundred thousand.
yeah, a view is nice, but i can’t believe how much disposable income people around here have to spend on one. my enjoyment of living in a building has more to do with whether it has decent appliances, good floors and walls, good plumbing, and a reliable manager.
I didn’t know this web site was a place for advertising.
Just an FYI, the Holiday Apts by CHH are not condos. They will be permanently affordable rentals for folks making between 30% and 60% of Area Median Income (about 17k-35k/year).
The conversion of that building encounter major, major problems. To the extent that people who had purchased when it was first converted were recently allowed to walk away. From what my friend told me (one of the people that walked away), the folks on the top floor have had some of the worst problems.
I’m not writing this to spread dirt, I just don’t like developers swooping into our neighborhood and taking advantage of people with shoddy work and overinflated prices.
Is there something blog-worthy here? Or is this just a big classified ad for condos?
Blech.
I would rather hear about the cheap condo – I have a friend who can buy that, and might have to move after renting for 20 years in the same location.
So, story on cheap condos??? Give a woot about view.
Peasants suffer in an inflated market ….
Definitely, Mike. We want this column to be diverse in style, price points, etc. Ideas welcome. It’s time to go the affordable route. If possible.
Really Alan and the +1er? We’re still shaping this feature but did you read it? Our goal is not to promote. Our goal is to talk about the places where people live on the Hill.
Thanks for the FYI, and that’s exactly why we’re looking forward to covering the Holiday renovation. We’re interested in covering the full range of housing options on Capitol Hill, and that absolutely includes affordable, rental apartments.
I guess it shouldn’t be a surprise that this is completely an unadulterated advertisement for Vertigo. Time to unlike on Facebook
This is not news. Behave.
Awesome. I would also love to see you cover one of the tall SHA towers on the Hill, since they are so unique in form and function.
I get it. Looking forward to your preview of the Holiday Apartments.
I’d rather have a balcony – and a real balcony, none of this Juliet nonsense – than a view. And I’d take the smallest bedroom in the world in exchange for a big living room.
And I’m OK with a small bathroom as long as I have a kitchen with plenty of space.
…why is the language in this post so promotional? This post sounds like realtor shill that belongs in the classified section. But I guess for a classified, it’s written very well.
Thanks for saying the piece is well-written.
And as for the criticism, the intent for this weekly feature is to inform readers about the range of housing in the neighborhood and to encourage a dialogue about what people like, what they don’t, what they want to see more or less of, and whether the price is right for what’s being offered.
As was said before, ideas are welcome.
This building needs to be torn down. It’s a moldy mess. Prime spot for a legit developer/preferably architect to rebuild. While your at it, re-do that halfway house across the road with an interior courtyard so the residents can hack and gag and giggle to their hearts’ content out of sight of taxpayers. Gintz Group knows nothing of construction, only cover up. Word to the wise: Never buy from a developer who hires day laborers. Buy the building-pleeease!!