Post navigation

Prev: (06/03/24) | Next: (06/04/24)

Council holds final public hearing on Seattle’s now $1.55B transportation levy proposal

The Seattle City Council will hold its final public hearing Tuesday on the 2024 transportation levy renewal as the proposal has grown another $100 million to $1.55 billion with proposed amendments that would “double investments in creating new sidewalks and safe routes to school, as well as triple funding for safety on public transit.”

Council transportation chair Rob Saka is bringing the proposed $100 million boost to the table for committee approval. The additions would bump the anticipated property tax bill from the levy for the Seattle median assessed value home to $499 a year — $30 higher than the initial proposal from Mayor Bruce Harrell.

Saka’s proposed changes include:

  • Double the investment in creating new sidewalks in areas that don’t have them
  • Double the investment in creating safe routes to schools to keep Seattle’s kids safe
  • Triple the funding to increase safety on public transit
  • Add $10 million for new investments in electric vehicle charging stations to address climate change
  • Add $20 million for a freight program to keep Seattle’s supply chain and economy moving
  • Add $7 million to the District Project Fund to ensure the unique needs of each council district can be met better and faster.

CHS reported here on the mayor boosting his office’s proposal with an additional $100 million in spending for sidewalks, bikes, and transit in the now $1.45 billion proposal.

The additional planned spending followed transit, biking, and pedestrian groups calling for an improved proposal after criticism over the plan’s focus on repairs, replacements, and realignments over new street and transit projects.

Tuesday’s hearing is part of wrapping up a sequence of committee and council activity culminating in a hoped for final committee vote in early July followed by a vote by the full council.

The levy decision would then go to voters and be part of November’s ballot.

The transportation committee is meeting Tuesday morning to discuss the proposed amendments. The public hearing (PDF) is scheduled for 4:30 PM.

 

$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE

Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 🖤 

 
 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cdresident
1 year ago

It’s a handout to drivers. I’m voting no, redo it so it makes sense for a city.

Jesse
1 year ago

Got to remove all the car-centric budget. Need way more money to Vision Zero and transit.

Caphillcyclist
1 year ago

As a cyclist who commutes throughout the city I welcome road maintenance! These roads need some work to be safer

1 year ago

Even Alex Pederson is against this.

Hold on to your wallets, Seattle,” Pederson said in a statement. “This troublesome transportation tax is not only unaffordable but also ineffective and inequitable. This levy is unaffordable because it’s piled on top of so many other recent property taxes while renters, homeowners, and small businesses struggle to stay in their own city. Ineffective because it will leave most roads riddled with potholes and most bridges in bad condition. Inequitable because it favors expensive pet projects for interest groups instead of the basics and fails to tap other sources of more equitable revenue. City council would be wise to divide it into several bite-size ballot measures or risk voters saying no.

CD Resident
1 year ago
Reply to  emeraldDreams

Even Alex Pederson is against this”

He’s like the worst on transportation. I’m against the levy but Pederson being against it makes me question whether I’m wrong.

poncho
1 year ago

So 20 million to increase the turning radii of street corners so tractor trailers don’t have to slow down turning while making it more dangerous and longer to cross the street? How otherwise do our streets not accommodate “Freight”?