A view of 10th/Union in the preferred — and only — scheme planned to be presented Wednesday night (Image: Alliance Realty Partners)
The first time through, the East Design Board said the plan didn’t do enough to “maximize preservation.”
This time, despite hopes from some in the community that they might be coming back to the table with a plan to preserve all of the character structures on the development’s parcels, the developers behind the 1020 E Union project say they can’t find a financially feasible way to include the 10th and Union Davis & Hoffman building in their plans for a seven-story, 250-unit, mixed-use apartment building on the southern edge of Pike/Pine’s core.
CHS has been told to expect a “coordinated response” from Capitol Hill community groups as the new plan comes before the design review board Wednesday night in a special double session that follows the project’s failed first run though the design process in March.
The new proposal does more to document what stays, what goes and why (Image: Alliance Realty Partners)
The weeks since the project was kicked back by the East board have been busy and changeful for Pike/Pine. First, the Melrose & Pine project drew wide attention as the developer’s plans for the Bauhaus building and a stretch of E Pine increased concerns that more of the neighborhood’s oldest buildings might soon be demolished. Meanwhile, a new development team bought into Pike/Pine by acquiring two key properties. With Pike/Pine facing this “unprecedented wave” of development, City Council president Sally Clark and Tom Rasmussen, who helped drive creation of a preservation district protecting the area, released a letter directing the East Design Board to “make the retention of existing character and structures a strong priority.”
In the wake of these developments in the world of Pike/Pine development, developers Alliance Realty Partners and Moisan Associated Architects took the unusual step of booking both of this week’s East Design Board slots as they plan to present the results of requested studies showing the feasibility of preserving the structures their first proposal would have demolished.
As part of their three-hour tour, the developers and architects will not, however, be presenting a proposed scheme that includes preservation of each of the existing structures on the half-block of Pike/Pine land — the 10th/Union Davis & Hoffman building (#03 in the proposal) currently home to Capitol Hill Housing and the Pravda events space, the Engler Car Repair building at 11th and Union (#02 and #04) currently home to Madison Park Group offices and the Union Garage on 10th (#01).
Project: 1020 E Union St mapDesign Proposal available at review meeting
Review Meeting: June 6, 6:30 pm Seattle University Student Center 901 12th Ave map Room 210 – Multipurpose Room Review Phase: EDG–Early Design Guidance past reviews Project Number: 3013040 permit status | notice Planner: Lisa Rutzick
A view from the west (Image: Alliance Realty Partners)
Alliance’s new plan
In a Friday sit-down with CHS, Alliance reps walked through their latest proposal and highlighted changes made to increase the preservation component of the project, solve issues with what was to be a large, northern blank wall and improve the pedestrian experience related to the future project.
For Wednesday night’s double design review sessions, Alliance representatives said they plan to bring only one proposal to the table.
The new plan calls for the project to incorporate an expanded facade as the garage and storage section of the Engler building along 11th would also be incorporated into the design along with the facade of the main structure at 11th and Union that was originally proposed to be retained. An Alliance representative said the expanded length of facade along 11th would help turn the street into a stronger pedestrian connection between Seattle University to the south and Cal Anderson to the north as well as help activate what she said is mostly an empty stretch of Pike/Pine.
The preservation of an additional length of facade along 11th Ave would also allow Alliance to claim an extra section of bonus height from the Pike/Pine Conservation District’s incentive program, an outcome that was left up in the air following uncertainty about how the new preservation rules work at the previous design review session.
While the preferred — and only — scheme to be presented doesn’t include the 10th and Union Davis & Hoffman building, Alliance does present its case for why the building needs to be torn down if the 1020 E Union project is to happen and will spend significant time, they say, Wednesday night showing the high degree of “facade modifications” that would be required to create an economically feasible building above the historical structure.
#03 – 1406 10th ave
This two story building was built in 1915 and is currently offices and event space. The building has had extensive changes to the windows and cladding sinceit’s original construction. The buildings architectural characteristics are not ascompatible with contemporary retail or residential uses. High ground floor above the sidewalk make street level entry infeasible without significant façade modifications. A conservation strategy study conducted by the city in 2006 did not mark this building as being desireable for retention.
While they don’t plan to keep the 10th and Union structure, to further “maximize preservation,” the developers now plan to extend the character facade on 11th. Thanks to “architectural characteristics that compliment contemporary retail uses,” the 11th Ave extension of facade pencils out, the developers contend:
Here is what the design board asked for in relation to historical “context” — ie, preservation — following the March session:
3. Context.
The Board encouraged maximizing the preservation of the character structures.
a. Additional analysis of how the project supports the intent of the Pike Pine Conservation Overlay and discussion of character structures should be explored and presented at the next meeting.
b. Further exploration of the adaptive re-use of the “Pravda Building” (1406 10th Avenue) should occur as part of the site redevelopment.
You can review the complete Department of Planning and Development report from that session here (PDF).
Beyond preservation, there are significant overhauls of the plan first presented in March. Architects have re-aligned the site to re-work what the board called “a relentless, massive interior view” presented in the first session. The preservation of an extended facade furthers goals of creating a more active streetscape along 11th. And the northern big, blank, “Costco” wall issue is solved with a proposed articulation and addition of “texture” to break up the potentially monotonous appearance:
Community opposition
The current shape of the new plan isn’t enough for at least one neighborhood group. Members of the Pike Pine Urban Neighborhood Council plans to meet with the developers again Monday but the council’s take after its initial review of the plan is that Alliance hasn’t done enough.
“One of the reasons the Pike Pine neighborhood is beloved is because of the aggregate value that our many historic buildings create; to lose any of them weakens that fabric and dilutes the atmosphere that is essential to the character of our district,” one PPUNC member tells CHS.
It appears that, as far as PPUNC is concerned at this point in the history of redeveloping Pike/Pine’s historical buildings, any plan that doesn’t preserve each of the existing structures is a failure.
“The Pike Pine Conservation Overlay contains incentives to reward developers for preserving vintage buildings. We cannot support a plan that asks for rewards but does not give something back to the community in the way of conservation in exchange for those rewards.”
Apparently, at this point, even the little, easily overlooked Union Garage is worthy of preservation.
Below is the draft version of the Early Design Guidance packet to be presented at this week’s meeting. The final should be posted to the DPD site prior to Wednesday’s session.
“…because of the aggregate value that our many historic buildings create; to lose any of them weakens that fabric and dilutes the atmosphere that is essential to the character of our district,”…”
really? we can’t lose ANY “historic” buildings? just because it’s old and you have some neat memories of it from your time clubbing in the area when it was “raw” is no reason to keep every building. pick a few, that actually have merit, and plant your flag in the ground around them.
i’m all for preserving as much architectural history as possible. but the majority of the buildings we’re talking about here are plain and non-descript. i don’t see how some ramshackle buildings on union constitute any historical heritage for this section of capitol hill.
i do like @jseattle’s comment:
“Apparently, at this point, even the little, easily overlooked Union Garage is worthy of preservation.”
you can’t save everything and everything isn’t worth saving. at some point it’s time to move on.
…it’s the “brick-and-aluminium-siding-with-twee-terraces-look” for the proposed new buildings. That’s original.
Seriously, how much more expense and effort would be involved in replicating the look of the vintage buildings in the neighbourhood, while incorporating the extant architectural features of the existing structures?
I really do love the 10th and Union Davis & Hoffman building. If you haven’t seen it before, the event space on the second floor is incredible…great texture, great windows, and just a warm and airy space. I’ll be sad to see it go. I know the developers need to turn a profit, but saying the ground floor can’t be adapted to “contemporary” commercial or residential space seems like such a shortsighted excuse. Isn’t it the idiosyncrasies that make historic buildings so unique and special and, dare I say, “marketable”?
Zeebleoop,
What you consider ‘ramshackle’ or ‘non descript’ may have been justifiably apt descriptions of much of the older building stock in the area that has recently been re-purposed; Melrose Market, Piston & Ring (home to La Spiga and Plum)the building now home to Elliott Bay Books. These and many others are now lively centers that have helped create new jobs while retaining vintage buildings that are essential to preserving what makes our neighborhood unique.
I do agree with you, not every building makes sense to save, but the ‘Pravda’ building at 10th & Union is just waiting for the right developer to restore it to it’s original beauty. Take a look at the restoration work currently underway at Hunter’s Capital building on E Pine & Bellevue (home to Area 51), day by day it’s been great fun to watch the contractor peel away past remodeling mistakes and reveal the buildings charming character.
So I hope you’ll take a look at what has been done so well by our local conservation minded developers and think again about what could be at the corner of 10th & Union; a restored pre-war character building and more housing. This would be a fulfillment of the Pike Pine Neighborhood Plan (density, please) and the Pike Pine Conservation Overlay.
Everybody wins.
that a developer who’s talking about strengthening the pedestrian connection on 11th (and thus preserving the existing facade) would propose such a hideous monstrosity on the 10th side of their project. At least from the drawings that 10th Avenue side looks completely, totally devoid of pedestrian interest.
You can’t save ’em all, but apparently you can try to replace ’em all with the same 7-story brick and glass dreck.
That would be a difficult retail space because the Windows are difficult to see in from the street level.
but not EVERY building needs to be replaced by the same 6 story retail on the bottom and apartments on top shit we have now. How about some that are JUST residential? Throw a pool on the bottom for the residents or something.
@chip
you should maybe re-read my comment and not just skim it. never once in my comment do i mention the pravda building. nowhere in my comment do i even take the tone that we should pull down every building over a certain age. i am one of the biggest supporters of preserving certain of our heritage buildings on the hill (and for the record i love the piston and ring building and melrose market building).
my comment above, if you’d actually read and comprehended it, is based around what a ppunc member said – “…we can’t lose ANY historic buildings.” and then i go on to clarify with @jseattle’s comment in the blog post itself – “Apparently, at this point, even the little, easily overlooked Union Garage is worthy of preservation.“
i agree we should save the pravda building and madison park group 1 building; and maybe even madison park group 2. but what’s the historical significance of the union garage building? why should we save it? if we’re saying we need to save ALL buildings then that’s including this ramshackle, non-descript garage. and, personally, it doesn’t seem worth restoring/integrating into new construction.
my point is, we can stand to lose SOME buildings. and the union garage would be one that i wouldn’t mind letting go if that means: more density, revitalized commerce on that stretch and less potential for crime.
How many more little (often vacant) retail spaces on the ground floor do we need in this corridor? Perhaps it would make better sense to include a theater. The area really does need more theater space, especially as the upstairs theaters are disappearing fast. The Pravda event space (which is upstairs) has been used. A theater and lobby and perhaps adjacent eatery would provide a nice amenity, improve the possibilities for all the local colleges and universities and high schools for performance space, and break up one of the facades nicely. (I’ll leave details to architects.) It could also provide a “theme” for the residential programming, if one wished.
Did I miss something? I dont know of many buildings on Cap Hill that have been saved. At this rate, I am thinking: “If you cant beat them, join them” … perhaps I could open a building demo company, I would be rich soon.
zeebleoop, are you a developer, an architect, or otherwise make your living from tearing down buildings and replacing them?
BINGO!
How about a bar that’d be open 24 hours like McGinn and the City Council want?