A pot entrepreneur and substitute teacher who has emerged as a community leader in the Judkins Park neighborhood is making a run for the District 3 seat on the Seattle City Council.
But he doesn’t see the coming campaign as a battle or a race.
“I have a different way of doing it. And we’re going to present our ideas of how to do it to our electorate, and we’re gonna let them choose,” Alex Cooley tells CHS, describing his plans for the campaign and what he hopes is an opportunity for voters in D3 to pick a new direction. “And that is truly, like, the beauty of democracy. That’s what it should be. It should not be vicious. It should not be people hating each other. I don’t want anything to do with that.”
Cooley’s proposed policies include a checklist of Seattle progressive causes including building new housing for those living unhoused and stopping sweeps, opening up more of the city to housing development, shifting more public safety funding to mental health and addiction services, and making public transit free but with a mostly middle ground approach that would build on existing efforts like increasing the JumpStart tax on large employers or limiting transition of currently single-family zoned areas to a more limited multifamily approach centered around duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes.
Most of his ideas come off as downright reasonable except for maybe the legalization of drugs — “all drugs” — that he sees as a pathway to realistically addressing issues of public safety and addiction while also creating abundant civic revenue.
With this mostly mellow approach to some radically progressive policies, Cooley is one of nine candidates vying for the seat being left open by incumbent Kshama Sawant who is leaving the council at the end of the year to focus on a new campaign to build a national political party with Socialist Alternative.
ELECTION 2023
- KSHAMA SAWANT: ‘Workers Strike Back’ — Sawant making ‘Important Announcement Regarding Her Council Office’ — UPDATE: She’s out
- ALEX HUDSON: With her heart on First Hill, Hudson joins race for District 3 with a neighborhood approach to urbanist policy
- JOY HOLLINGSWORTH: With ‘cannabis justice,’ hunger advocacy, and three generations in the Central District, Hollingsworth enters race for District 3 — UPDATE
- EFRAIN HUDNELL: This District 3 candidate wants to use affordable housing to help save Seattle from a ‘death spiral that we’ve seen in cities that have gone boom to bust in a way that only American cities do’
- ANDREW ASHIOFU: As D3 candidate field crowds, Ashiofu hopes unique perspectives on housing, health, and transit will change the race
- RY ARMSTRONG: The race for District 3 had to have a Democracy Voucher candidate — Ry Armstrong just might be it
- More…
Cooley is a Judkins Park area resident where he has worked as a substitute teacher and is currently busy serving as a de facto general contractor on an over-schedule remodel of the old Central District house he is overhauling for his young family. A member of multiple area community groups and organizations, Cooley says he has also emerged to lead a public safety effort around 23rd and Jackson near where his child attends daycare, a process that has brought together departments from across the city and county — but not the property developer Vulcan — to sort out a safer future for the busy commercial and residential development area after ongoing shootings and street violence.
“Vulcan? I hope they would be there,” Cooley says about the real estate developer’s absence from the process. Nope. They don’t come to the meetings. I’m very frustrated by it.”
Still, Cooley says the work is helping to make the neighborhood safer for the community and his family and has been a valuable experience as he considers his possible role with the council.
Cooley also sees his contributions to shaping cannabis policy in Seattle and across the state as a foundation for his campaign.
“I’ve helped the City of Seattle write every single piece of legislation on cannabis that they’ve written since 2010,” Cooley said. “So I’ve written a law, I’ve passed law. I know the reality of politics being the heart of the possible. I’ve walked the second floor countless times for years getting legislation written to pass in this city. So, in a lot of ways I’ve done it.”
But Cooley also acknowledges the legal pot industry has work to do here. He is hopeful the city’s recently passed cannabis equity legislation will help do more to create true opportunity for communities left behind. Cooley, who says he is working as a mentor in the program, also says it will take more than just a few BIPOC-owned pot shops and that better business opportunities than the stores need to be opened up including legalizing cafes where cannabis can be smoked and consumed.
“It we get social equity significantly better, I’ll look back at my career and I’ll say, ‘Mission accomplished, job well done,'” Cooley said.
A co-founder of marijuana cultivator Solstice and still working in the industry as a consultant, Cooley is one of two pot entrepreneurs up for consideration in D3 as he will be running along with Joy Hollingsworth, a Black, queer cannabis farming entrepreneur and Central District resident.
What is it like for a white, straight progressive to decide to run against Hollingsworth? For one, Cooley doesn’t see it as “against.” And, more importantly, he says, he likes Joy.
“Joy is a great person and she is a reasonable person,” Cooley said, comparing the two — at an, um, high level — to “the kind of glow of what Kennedy versus Goldwater was.”
“It was supposed to be like this new concept of campaign and this is the conversation,” Cooley explained. “As soon as I heard as she might be running, I called her up and I said, let’s go grab a coffee. And that’s because what this process of the next nine months, in my opinion, should be. It should be a group of people who truly care about the city and are courageous enough to stand up and try and be a service to the city and our district and present their ideas on how to make the city better.”
Cooley like his eight other D3 candidate counterparts is part of the city’s Democracy Voucher program and currently working to qualify for the public funding. Only Hollingsworth and Transportation Choices Coalition leader Alex Hudson have so far qualified for the 2023 cycle. Here is how to put your vouchers to work in this year’s election.
Learn more at cooleyforcouncil.org.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍
Oh, boy! Can capitol hill can have someone well educated, forward looking, but not so called “progressive”, as such a wonderful word and meaning is tainted now for me. The one with a good experience in business as well. We need more housing in every region US, but it’s already annoying to see so many populist promises, just to get more votes, without any meaningful results. No need for another Sawant or, god forbid, someone worse then her. Think smart, people. Look what’s happening on the streets. It gets scarier with every day. It’s a huge drugs problem. Housing will not fixed it, but definitely will help others, disable with no addictions and families.
Treatment for drugs addiction shouldn’t be a choice, but a requirement to live in society. I am talking about hard drugs, before it’s too late. Some streets already look like from zombiland. Nice talk and requests just don’t work here. Save the young and future generations.I don’t think the person who demands all drugs to become legal is really cares about anyone or anything, but his pot business.
Looking at Portugal and Netherlands, you can decriminalize (not _legalize_) all drugs, if you also have robust enforcement of required drug treatment. The state can say you’re not a criminal who needs to do hard time if you’re caught using, but the state should be able to force you to clean up through state-provided recovery programs. It’s not compassion to let someone sink lower and lower into an addiction.
Cherry-picking what well-funded, small, homogeneous European nations do as a comparison to what Seattle or the USA could do is always apples-to-oranges comparisons. The European countries benefit from a lot of advantages that we do not have here. Everything from their gun laws aren’t beholden to an overly-cited 2A, to their per-capita funding available for social programs is a significant jump ahead of where ours are, to they aren’t held back by a nation running elections based around who owns land rather than where the people live (see our Electoral College and our allocation of ~18% of the electorate having ~50% of the vote).
The state could intervene like you suggest, and I would even be in favor of that. When I’ve proposed exactly this on other forums, the Progressives have responded with accusations that I favored “concentration camps for the homeless.” These “forced state recovery programs” would require housing for the homeless, and that housing would need ongoing supervision and milestones and metrics, and there would need to be a custodial element or the addict would just walk right back out the following morning. And voila, you’ve just invented the minimum-security jail or drug-treatment halfway-house with house-arrest being a part of it.
We have Progressives still preaching “harm reduction” and “when they’re ready” which stops every attempt at custodial / legally-required rehab in its tracks. And then you have an ever growing number of OD, an ever growing amount of drug-fueled crime, yet a legal system less and less interested in taking any action, again, in response to these Progressive philosophies.
Unless or until Seattle, Western Washington and the entire West Coast decides it’s ready to move on from Progressive “harm reduction” that is perversely enabling more people to die on the streets, we cannot address really any of the homeless – drug crisis issues. Right now, most Progressives won’t even admit that the homeless crisis even IS a drug-fueled crisis. They consider just making this statement is “demeaning our unhoused neighbors.”
Yes yes yes, I’ve been saying this for a long time. We’ve basically de-criminalized drugs already but haven’t moved to the next step which is treatment and many of those countries don’t make an arrest but they do confiscate any drugs found on anyone. The key needs to be stop the use.
You’re right. We need someone that can deliver practical, workable solutions that will make a difference.
Is he really in favor of legalizing “all drugs.”? No way I would vote for him.
I also strongly disagree with his desire to “stop the sweeps.” They are absolutely necessary, as long as they are preceded by vigorous outreach (for a short period of time) with efforts to bring the homeless indoors.
He is a no vote from me.