An August primary can be a quiet affair but the loudest political battle on Capitol Hill ballots this summer appears to be in the race for the open 43rd District seat in the Washington House of Representatives.
Still, not many have heard the voices of the candidates in the race and the loudest statement so far might be the flood of Andrea Suarez yard signs that suddenly are lining certain Capitol Hill and Central District arteries.
Suarez’s challenger Shaun Scott doesn’t have a yard sign army but he does have the highest profile endorsements in the race and the support of Frank Chopp, the Washington political legend and housing champion whose retirement opened the seat.
“While we’re talking about wide support, we’re happy to be endorsed in this race by almost every labor organization that’s endorsed in this race,” Scott says. “We’re proud to be endorsed in this race by every sitting Washington state lawmaker who is going to be in Olympia in 2025 after this election.”
“It’s easy to put a yard sign… even if they didn’t consent to it being put up in the area around where they live. It’s much harder to build a winning coalition.”
The Race for Legislative District 43, State Representative Pos. 2 — August Primary
- Stephanie LLoyd-Agnew (Prefers Democrat Party) withdrawn
- Shaun Scott (Prefers Democratic Party)
- Daniel Carusello (Prefers Democratic Party)
- Andrea Suarez (Prefers Democratic Party)
Scott, a lobbyist with the Statewide Poverty Action Network who narrowly lost a 2019 race to represent the University District on the Seattle City Council, and Suarez are the top-funded candidates in this summer’s 43rd race and seem likeliest to emerge from the August primary for the push to November’s general election.
Scott has raised just over $70,000 in the race and spent around half of it on canvassing and outreach. Suarez has raised more than $78,000 and spent nearly $45,000 on outreach and mailers. Another $18,000 has been spent on her behalf by the Jackson Legacy Fund, a political action fund formed “to elect and retain pragmatic Democrats who appeal to the state’s political center.”
Third in the fundraising race is Daniel Carusello, a tech account manager and former intern for the Washington Republican Party now running as a Democrat in the 43rd. The Seattle Times, befuddled by the choices of Scott on the party’s left and Suarez on its right, is backing Carusello with a tepid “much needed common sense” endorsement. Carusello has now raised more than $50,000 in the race.
The Stranger, by the way, is throwing its weight behind Scott. Suarez says Stephanie Lloyd-Agnew has dropped out and is helping with her campaign.
Suarez, who has gained notoriety through the We Heart Seattle organization she started as a neighborhood clean-up and homelessness volunteer group and has grown into her full-time job as “a bleeding heart bean counter” shining a light on what she says is bloated government spending and waste, is so far into the state’s “political center” that her campaign felt the most important message to display on all of those yard signs was, simply, “ANDREA SUAREZ — DEMOCRAT.”
“Well, I am a Democrat,” Suarez says. “I’ve only donated to Democrats, including the Win for Women Pac and am an elected PCO officer in the 43rd and have the certificate to prove it. But right out of the gate, my opposition came after me because I talk or affiliate with the Republican party, and it’s another one of these, if you’re not ride or die on the far left progressive agenda on every issue, you’re somehow a right winger. And that’s kind of the Seattle kind of temperament here in the 43rd.”
How Suarez will fare on ballots here remains to be seen. In March, CHS looked at the area’s most conservative voting enclaves and, frankly, there isn’t much to work with. But Suarez believes her approach to government will resonate.
“I think we probably spend money inefficiently. I think we probably do. I think on purpose. In fact, government does that and for a good reason,” Suarez says. “We don’t want to make careless, flippant quick spending decisions. There’s a rhyme and reason for government to be slow and bureaucratic, but then you make just really bad decisions.”
A small government approach means Suarez’s platform is pretty limited. She wants more cops, supports specific technology spends like Truleo to provide more oversight over police through voicy analytics technology, says she believes there should be more support for affordable housing programs like the Multifamily Tax Exemption and more protection from litigation for condominium developers.
As for the homelessness crisis We Heart Seattle has plunged into the middle of to show what it says is a grassroots, volunteer-driven, one on one, anti-drug, anti-crime approach, Suarez says her mission is to help dissolve wasteful solutions and programs like the King County Regional Homelessness Authority and break the habits of organizations she says profit off the ineffective cycle.
“All of that was government. And when all of that fell flat, I went to Home Depot and said, well, frankly, it’s a fucking garbage bag and some pinchers,” Suarez says with pride about her first steps with We Heart Seattle and, now, politics.
It’s a challenging position. Suarez says she recently began drawing a salary for her work on We Heart Seattle — “a paycheck as a consultant, but under six figures” — and the organization is also in the process of joining the ranks of the service organizations she has so vehemently criticized with plans to bid on an open $300,000 government contract to provide homelessness services.
Scott says Suarez doesn’t know what she is talking about.
“Well, this is a race for the state legislature. I wanted to point that out just because many days, I’m not certain that Andrea Suarez is aware of that this is a race that is going to have to do with a good many issues that the city actually has no purview over and that Andrea Suarez has no professional history of addressing,” Scott said.
Scott’s campaign for Chopp’s seat has focused on the candidate’s connections to the political veteran and their work together on Bill 1474, “a groundbreaking law that addressed racial segregation with housing assistance to families redlined from exclusive neighborhoods.”
Scott’s campaign has also focused on continuing to respond to the issues that drove the Black Lives Matters protests and the responses to the COVID-19 crisis that forged progressive policies including the creation of a public social housing developer in Seattle.
Scott says his progressive Democratic message is resonating with voters around the Central District and Capitol Hill in the 43rd.
“We’ve talked about fully funding our public schools, taxing the ultra wealthy to build the housing that we need and to fund the services that we all use. We’ve talked about making Washington state that is actually a true climate leader in working with the organized labor to build up a green jobs program and fund trade programs and a public renewables program,” Scott said. “We’ve talked about Washington being a much more accessible state, and that’s a set of issues that speaks to a winning majority and a winning coalition in this district.”
Voters are particularly interested in hearing real solutions for the state’s public schools and not allowing the movements around charter schools and strength of private education to further erode Washington’s system.
“Schools need to see more leadership around whether or not these school closures are actually going to save the money that they’re projected to save,” Scott says. “Most experts and people who have looked at this issue closely say that the school closures don’t even address the very premise of the school closures, which is saving a certain amount of money.”
“We’re seeing an enrollment crisis in Seattle schools, which is the heart of the declining budget, and what you have is a situation where as a result of declining investment over the last seven or eight years, people are pulling their kids from schools and it starts a very unvirtuous cycle of public disinvestment, public divestment.”
View Results — Results are filtered for response quality to limit ballot stuffing. Thanks!
Suarez is less protective of the system. She says she believes in the philosophy of the Rotary Club — she’s a proud member — when it comes to making decisions. “”Number one, is it true? Number two, is it fair for all involved? Number three, is it good for the common good?,” she says. “And then the fourth is, does it benefit all? Benefit all.”
Public school systems don’t necessarily pass that test. Neither, it turns out in her view of things, do protections around issues like reproductive health and trans rights.
“I mean, first off, I vehemently oppose anybody getting in the way of my body, my body, my rights. I’m a woman, okay? I’m sorry, Shaun. Really, I’m a woman,” she says, addressing her opponent and anybody who questions her dedication to Democratic positions around abortion.
But Suarez backs off talk about specific legislated protections including issues around kids and transitioning.
“I don’t sit here and claim I can read every opinion piece, every study around the world and have a position on it,” Suarez says. “And what I say is that conversation is with the child, the parent, the doctor. They do them. It’s almost like, is it my business?”
Scott, meanwhile, believes these issues are, indeed, the state’s business and he has been busy telling as many voters about it face to face.
“In Capitol Hill, I think people have gotten pretty used to seeing me around at the farmer’s market. We’ve been posted up there practically every Sunday for about the last month,” he says. “We really get to hear from a great cross section of people who live in our district. It’s part of the reason why I think that this race is going to defy some of the easy categorizations that I think we’ve become accustomed to in our city politics because we’re hearing from renters and students in Capitol Hill the same way that we’re hearing from a lot of those homeowners in North Capitol Hill and in the surrounding area, and a lot of them are saying the same things, voicing the same concerns.”
“We’ve gotten hundreds of signatures around the proposition of taxing the ultra rich to build more affordable housing and to keep our schools open,” Scott says.
For 43rd voters, the August primary could be an interesting test of the questions around these opposing approaches to government with a true final exam looking likely in November.
Learn more about Scott at betterwashington.org and Suarez at electandrea.com. You can find out more about Daniel Carusello at danielcarusello.com.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 🖤
My vote goes to whomever supports sweeping all homeless encampments.
Sweep and keep the streets clean.
Without a doubt that is Suarez, who was out in front leading park cleanups when most of the city’s Progressives were trying to stop her and anyone else from taking action “until they’re ready.” Shaun Scott is a Progressive and favors not sweeping parks or enforcing laws in general.
Suarez is a hero that exposed the ineptitude of the homeless NGOs and city homeless response that created the drug encampment/crime crisis. She has saved lives. This is the type of person we need to lead us out of the drug zombie apocalype by prioritizing treatment, action and accountability.
Scott is a Sawant clone that will give the parks and streets over to drug addicts and dealers from across the country and close the juvenile detention center even though juvenile violent crime is up 150%.
Great, Suarez it is. Sweep all homeless. California is doing it, we need to be next, and never allow homeless to occupy public land.
Sweep to where? Your house?
Shelters. Prison if they’re criminals. this is not that complicated. Newsom’s new order is the blueprint.
Not complicated, perhaps, but very expensive.
No, your house.
Some commenters here seem to have forgotten that this is an election for a seat in the STATE legislature, not the city council. What Scott might or might not do about Seattle’s parks and streets isn’t really relevant to this race.
Suarez picks up litter, and that’s nice. I do too and I wish more people did. But that hardly qualifies either of us to make laws for the entire state. Personally, I’m going to trust that after 30 years in office, Frank Chopp (who no one would mistake for a wild-eyed radical) knows a thing or two about who would best serve the district in Olympia. That alone is a fairly compelling reason to give Scott a try.
Yuck why are you so hateful?
Wanting people out of parks and assault / OD danger is not hateful. Demanding they remain in place because it suits your political agenda is hateful.
lmao you lost
Andrea Suarez being an “elected PCO officer” for the Democratic Party sounds a lot like Dan Savage being “elected” PCO for the Republican Party in 1996 because he was the only one from his precinct to show up.
Dan never was really a Republican, but he got a great This American Life story out of it.
This American Life, Episode 32, Act 2, if you want to know what it takes to be a PCO in the 43rd.
Dan Savage didn’t just get elected PCO in 1996, we elected him to the county convention, if I recall correctly. That was back when being a “Republican” meant anything from being fiscally responsible at heart to being bats–t crazy on some fringe issue. Dan actually had some fiscal sense in his heart. Too bad there is no place for Dan in the current Republican Party.
We all love a little hyperbole…
Paragraph 4 Scott claims to have been endorsed by “… every sitting Washington state lawmaker who is going to be in Olympia in 2025 after this election.”
Please verify this claim.
Two awful choices. Scott is a full on tankie with Sawant like local politics and Andrea is a bat shit insane narcissist that isn’t really a democrat.
I’ve met and done some work with Andrea, she’s in her own world and was not appreciative of my time. I’d seriously vote for a turnip over either these loons.
Seattle really deserves better candidates but once again this is what we get to choose from.
I agree. It’s heartbreaking we can’t get somebody with a good head on their shoulders.
Agreed. Scott seems very knowledgeable but far left. Suarez’ positions look good on paper, but having worked with her group she is a total nut job and I really don’t think she has the capacity to handle all the different policy issues that come with being a state legislator. Voting for Carusello, hoping the ST endorsement gets him through, and hopefully we can get some more normal candidates next time around.
Scott is a fine choice and gets my vote! Stop the haterade
Found the Sawantist. We don’t need any more of this junk in Seattle.
Kshama “Never-Lost-an-Election” Sawant
I’d be tempted to vote Suarez just because I know it makes people like you stamp your little feet and hold your breath until you turn blue… but nah- I’ll vote for her because she’s got a proven track record of actually accomplishing something…. The last thing I’d be interested in is another Sawant. It’s policies that she pushed that allowed things to become as bad as they did. Thankfully there were enough completely fed up people to vote Harrell in. Are we even back to baseline – nope, it will take time to fix the mess, but it’s already waaaaaay better than it was just a couple years ago.
Ummm
Me thinks this is a wee exaggeration. Suggest you fact check.
Paragraph 4. Scott claims to have endorsements from “… every sitting Washington state lawmaker who is going to be in Olympia in 2025 after this election.”
I’m ready to move on from passive, safe politics of the past (Scott) and lean into taking bold, creative steps to improve our city and state. I’ve seen and heard Suarez, she’s new to politics (plus) but not afraid to roll up sleeves and get to work.
In our fair city where the political spectrum seems to run only left from Chairman Mao to Pol Pot, Andrea Suarez has the cojones to stand apart from the crowd. And thank gawd for that.
I have been out on cleanups with Andrea, and not only does she quickly get the newbies past the OMG factor of dealing with the nastiest, filthiest messes you’ve ever seen, she actually makes it fun! Who knew that a contest for picking up the most kinds of hypo needles could itself become addictive? I can’t vote for her but I’m diving through the sofa cushions to find every dime to contribute to her effort.
She’s the real deal, folks, in a town full of poseurs.
Don’t need the Sawant disease in Olympia. Hoping this is the last we see of Shawn Scott trying to dip into to public till for his lunch money. Andrea Suarez has me intrigued. How Olympia, King County and Seattle has addressed vulnerable populations living under the proverbial bridge seems more to trap them under then help them out. Suarez — proven time and time again — has moved folk off the streets. Can what she does be scaled? I’m hoping so.
Sawant won D3 every time she ran. She was great. You were in the minority.
She barely beat her recall then refused to run for reelection. Her brand was tainted permanently when she demanded SPD – that she had tried to defund by 50 % the year before – provide her special guard to defend her yard from someone throwing bags of poop into it.
She is a punchline to a bad joke. Her time is over. Seattle voters spoke loudly in 2023 by electing a non Progressive Council 5 out of 7 positions; to go with Harrell, Nelson and Republican City Attorney Ann Davison in 2021.
The Socialists / Progressives greatly overplayed your hand after BLM. You tried to remove – not just defund – remove SPD. You enabled a crime wave in Seattle that beat national trends. Drug OD increased 10x on your watch.
Seattle sees you.
I’m disappointed in seeing Shaun Scott get all these high-profile endorsements. I think those giving it are just looking at the superficial: He’s an energetic, idealistic young black man.
If you scratch the surface, he’s very not impressive.
We just got rid of Kshama and are now in danger of electing someone of a similar ideology but to a higher political position. I’m crossing my fingers that the district dodges this bullet.
Well, Mr. Scott seems to think we have disinvested from public schools over the last six or seven years. In what universe is that true? Seattle Public School’s budget has done nothing but grow over that time period, yet outcomes continue to decline while enrollment drops. People are pulling their kids out of Seattle Public Schools due to mismanagement , not declining funding. You might want to get a better grasp of the issues Sean. And are you even a Democrat? I seem to recall you as a member of the Democratic Socialists.
I support the common sense candidate who declines Capitol Hill political purity tests. I like people who aren’t afraid to bring bold ideas forward, even in the face of withering criticism from the prevailing social order. Our political class needs someone to shake the cage and free up some new ideas and offer different ways of approaching our problems. Mr. Scott offers more of the same from the far left of the political spectrum.
And a final point. Many of the Saurez signs have disappeared from area arterials in the past week or so. I wonder who removed them? I suspect Mr. Scott’s supporters, who decline yard signs as a form of political outreach, may be responsible for their disappearance. Such behavior would be consistent with the behavior of Sawant supporters, many of whom no doubt have jumped on the Scott bandwagon.
It’s illegal to put campaign signs up on public arterials or sidewalk frontage strips without the consent of the property owner, so Suarez is breaking the law by having them there in the first place. Perhaps the city is just enforcing the law and cleaning up the trash she left out?
Law and order for thee but not for me
Political campaign signs are exempt from the regulation you cite, at least by tradition. There is no way the city would remove such signs. It’s very likely that they were removed by immature Scott supporters.
There were quite a few Suarez signs on 24th Ave E between Aloha and Boyer. All have been removed. Shameful!
Given the presence of other political signs along Seattle roadways currently, that would be a case of very selective enforcement.
Scott is a Dem Socialist. Probably even to the left of most of them. He’s a bat crap Marxist
Scott is a real black leader unlike Harrell. He’s not Marxist, he’s a DemSoc which is a completely different school of thought. Wish people had to take quizzes on the words they use wrongly.
Supporters used to claim Sawant was a dem socialist all the time, when she was, by her own loud and proud admission, a card carrying member of an absolutely Marxist party… so you’ll excuse any skepticism I have of anyone that other people say isn’t one, especially if they supported her.
Andrea has done amazing, selfless work as head of We Heart Seattle, and I trust her to bring the same enthusiasm and commitment to the State Legislature. She is a solid moderate politically, whereas Scott is a very leftist ideologue as evidenced by his wacky ideas during the Seattle City Council race. The choice is clear.
I suggest people did a bit re Suarez: this quote from FUSE and there’s lots more really horrific behavior: There’s an entire website dedicated to the harm that the nonprofit has done, claiming that with all their $1.5 million in charitable donations, (I Heart Seattle)
An entire politically spun website against Suarez and her group by stop the sweep and pro-homeless supporters? That one? As someone who is now completely hardened and heartless after living and still living next to on-going encampments, in public parks and alleys, a candidate that comes out and says, “I’ll give them 5 minutes to collect their items and vacate or go to jail” now would have my 100% support.ill even send fined dollars. I am now an anti-crime and anti-encampment voter. I honestly don’t care about any other issues. They have been beaten out of me by far-left policies that now have people smoking fent at both access points to the Capitol Hill Library. I can’t get to qfc without getting fent blasted.
It is sickening that people like you who openly and fascistly hate the homeless exist on Capitol Hill… what the hell happened to our neighborhood? Is it techie related?
I’ve lived here since before the tech boom and don’t even work in tech. I am now middle-aged and middle-income, trying to keep up with the area that I’ve invested hundreds of community volunteer hours in and have called home. It’s disgusting to have to wade through drug users and dealers to go to the grocery store. It’s shameful Safeway has a “store within a store” to help prevent theft. It’s gut wrenching to hear almost daily gun shots ring out nightly somewhere in the surrounding blocks. If you think us is a normal and healthy way to run a city, you are part of the problem.
I don’t hate the homeless on the hill. I hate the open drug use on the hill. I hate the entrenched encampments on the hill taking away limited green space from the rest of the community. If a homeless person wants to sit all day on a bench at Cal Anderson and leave when park closes, fine by me. As soon as they put up a tent and accumulate a pile of trash, that is what I have issue with.
Exactly….well said!
I agree with you. Being fed up with the city’s permissive (and possibly corrupt) homeless policy doesn’t make some one a “fascist” no matter how much the ideologues scream it.
Who uses words like “fascistly?”
We oppose campers remaining in place because OD death is up 10x in the past 10 years, over 1000. Violent crime is up in Seattle in the past 10 years, contradicting the national trend. Progressive “harm reduction strategies” have been miserable failures for all involved. And your accusation of cruelty is completely not supported by data – leaving homeless drug addicts to camp is to sentence them to die, by OD or assault / violence.
Your position is proven immoral and you are ridiculous for promoting it
That website is a hit job. We heart Seattle has accomplished more for people suffering in encampments and the city then all of the other NGOs combined so she is very threatening to those that rely on the status quo of limitless funds with no accountability. She is the disrupter that we need.
Straight up not true lol. We Heart Seattle wants homeless in jail for being poor and are NIMBY Karens who can’t stand sight of the poor. Get real
Oh yeah the Karen thing. Tired. Racist. Misogynist.
There is nothing worse than organizations that have over a billion dollars in funds being outplayed by a bunch of volunteers, the only way to fight back is to talk smack about them. Just look at the KCRHA. WHS has placed as many in housing for pennies on the thousands of dollars.
Most of the content of that site is exaggerated lies thought up by Alycia Ramirez and other enemies of We Heart Seattle – often aligned with the Mutual Aid contingent of Seattle politics. Suarez’s success with placing homeless campers into housing or shelters is a direct threat to Mutual Aid’s business model of keeping homeless camping in public, supplying them, then fundraising from doing so. Mutual Aid has a visceral hatred of We Heart Seattle and Andrea Suarez.
Hard pass on both
If you liked Sawant, you’re gonna love Scott. Hard pass. Nope. Nope. Nope.
I love both!!!
I cannot vote for Scott. Way too far left.
Isn’t left enough for me. Wish he’d go farther. But I will proudly vote for a progressive black leader. Scott is a great person.