Post navigation

Prev: (10/06/24) | Next: (10/07/24)

As rising rents erode queer communities across Capitol Hill and the Central District, leaders pin hope on state rent stabilization legislation

Rep. Nicole Macri at the September affordable housing forum (Image: CHS)

Nobody in Washington rents like the queer communities living across Capitol Hill and the Central District rent. Political and community leaders say there could be new opportunities in Olympia to address the climbing rents in the city’s core causing continued displacement among the city’s LGBTQIA+ population.

Advocates and legislators met in September with the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance to discuss rent stabilization and support, where House Bill 2114— which passed in the House and died in the Senate this past year — took up much of the conversation and was the’ go-to answer when responding to community questions about how they will improve the lives of renters.

A National Low Income Housing Coalition report this summer found that workers in the Seattle and Bellevue areas would need to earn $50.87 per hour to afford a two-bedroom unit.

A recent University of Washington graduate spoke about their experiences with renting in Seattle.

“The lack of stable rents really makes me feel as if Seattle doesn’t want to support young people, especially those who are all about improving their communities and not just making a big salary,” the renter said.

“It’s likely I won’t be able to stay in Capitol Hill at a certain point due to a future rent increase.”

The challenges for renters in Seattle hit the city’s LGBTQIA+ communities especially hard.

“LGBTQIA+ individuals have been priced out of Seattle, yet many are still having to commute back into the city for work and affirming healthcare,” Taylor Farley, executive director of Queer Power Alliance said. “This dynamic has created significant challenges related to housing security, economic stability, and quality of life for our community members.”

Michele Thomas, director of policy and advocacy for the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance, says the continued failure to enact legislation to stabilize renter households is “allowing unchecked rising rent to displace tens of thousands of renters from their communities” which drives them away from neighborhoods and communities “where they’ve forged deep roots, worked to create safe space, and cultural connection.”

Speaking at the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance event, local state leaders said queer displacement should add increased urgency to solutions that will help all Washington renters.

“The state needs to continue to invest in supporting people who will struggle for a long time into getting into private market housing,” Rep. Nicole Macri said. “I’m looking at some policy to look at some of our short-term subsidy programs that, maybe, 15 years ago were a good idea…but now what we hear is that when their short-term subsidy runs out, they’re off the cliff, they can’t afford the rent for the place they’re in.”

Macri said she has been working on a rent stabilization bill for years and thinks HB 2114 was one that struck a nice balance in conversations and deliberations. HB 2114 will be reintroduced in 2025, and would cap late fees, require a six month notice for all rent increases of 3% or more, and allow for maximum rent raises of 5%.

“We have the potential in the next couple of months to change the dynamics, really dramatically, in the Senate,” Rep. Jamie Pedersen said.

Pedersen says he feels bullish about Democrats scooping four seats in the Senate that are currently held by Republicans. Pedersen said flipping those seats would create a two-thirds majority, allowing them to propose constitutional amendments in the Senate.

“At 33 votes, we have a really exciting opportunity in front of us, which is that one of the core drivers of housing costs in our state—and a significant disincentive for landlords to produce more affordable housing—is this tucked away in the constitution, which is called the ‘Uniformity Clause’,” Pedersen said.

The Uniformity Clause states that all property taxes in Washington must be set at the same rate, which Pedersen said has prevented progressive property taxation. If the Senate can hit a two-thirds majority, Pedersen said voters would have the opportunity to make an amendment that allows the creation of homestead exemptions on primary residences, which would flow onto multi-family properties.

“We have the potential, really, to do something that could dramatically increase the incentive to produce affordable housing in our state, and in the long run, I totally agree in the short-run, given the stories that we’ve heard, some sort of rent stabilization…is going to help people stay in the communities that they’re in,” Pedersen said.

Pedersen supports HB 2114, and was asked what he would do to ensure the passage of this bill without amending and potentially damaging it. Pedersen said he has a strong desire to pass a rent stabilization package of bills to address affordable housing challenges, and is excited to have a new housing committee chairperson.

“I am heartened that we have the groundwork laid,” Pedersen said. “I’m feeling bullish on the prospects for making significant progress for 2025.”

Macri said one feature of the bill is having the Attorney General provide enforcement to ensure statewide compliance.

“Any bill that has a financial impact is going to be more challenging this session that it was in previous sessions,” Macri said. “I’m assuming it’ll remain a high priority bill for the House.”

 

$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻 

Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍 

 
 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hillery
10 months ago

These landlords. My last apartment they wanted to raise my rent $300 and refused to renew for same price or less of an increase. Then I moved and it finally got re rented at less than what I had paid. If they were not so stubborn I would have stayed at the property. But some people can’t afford to move or the other rent prices and it’s just a mess but we already know this.

LandlordGay
10 months ago

To be honest, seeing how one-party rule has messed things up in California over the last 30 years, I’m not as excited as Jamie (who I do support on many issues) to see the Dems have a veto-proof majority for passing amendments.

I get that many Republicans are “icky” but unchecked one-party rule of either kind seems destined for bad results.

Derek
10 months ago
Reply to  LandlordGay

Need a true progressive party. Democrats are republicans now

Whatever
10 months ago
Reply to  Derek

No; they are not – and you saying it over and over like some misguided mantra doesn’t make it so.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago
Reply to  Whatever

Agree 100% with Derek. There’s no progressive wing to facilitate the support Bernie Sanders was getting en masse in 2020 and there needs to be. Democrats have lost the plot. They defend fascism over socialism.

Whatever
10 months ago

Correct me if I’m wrong, but these Democrats you despise – you’re suckling at their teats to get you far left candidates elected this election cycle, no?

Stumpy
10 months ago

Meanwhile Sawant stumps for Jill Stein. Each vote away from Harris gets us closer to, um, fascism.

Stumpy
10 months ago
Reply to  Whatever

Well that’s Trump’s MOA. Say it over and over again and people will believe you. He has literally said this. Derek you are on the same page as Trump. Give it a goddam rest. Please. For the love of god.

Tim
10 months ago

Economic displacement is a going to happen. This is a west coast city that is increasingly becoming a heteronormative allied city. Land lords what their money. Seattle never promised to be affordable for all the queer red state refugees who have fled to progressive blue cities for better quality of life. And most developers don’t want to provide affordable housing. They are banking on middle and high income earners to help them pay off their loan for their new high rise or apartment complex. And land lords whom rent out their houses deserve to make a profit. This conversation is bigger than queer people tbh. It’s about working class Seattleites who have to make snap decisions about their future in this region. It’s not 1990 something… it’s 2024 and Seattle is now officially an American big city and not just some dot that people used to point to on a map. It’s an actual destination for a lot of Americans, and we welcome those who can pay.

Derek
10 months ago
Reply to  Tim

Need to do more of what africatown in the CD is doing for equity apartments, need so many more of them

Sadsea
10 months ago
Reply to  Tim

Working class people should be able to live in cities lol. This is a bad take and reeks of classism.

Tim
10 months ago
Reply to  Sadsea

No one should have to commute next to an hour to make minimum wage plus tips just to pay a similar rent two cities away.

Bubbleator
10 months ago
Reply to  Tim

Ever been to London, Paris or Rome? Their wage slaves ride buses and trains, too.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago
Reply to  Tim

Geeze can you get anymore classist and out of touch than this post? Do better Tim.

Tim
10 months ago

You would not know what classist is if it presented it self to you with a sash and a crown. New developments are popping up fast. they attract middle and high income earners who can afford to compete for rents. More over they CAN AND DO come from places that don’t view the community very well and it’s a stretch to say they will just because they live in Seattle. LGBTQ people are being bullied out of the education system and more so their minimum wage jobs. Unions at queer friendly corporations are being busted and we, the lgbtq are poorly making it. Our America just started to give a rats ass about us, and now that’s all under threat. So I am with it. Because I sure can’t move to Kansans or present white and hetero.

LOL
10 months ago

Rent control is aggressively stupid and doesn’t work. I think “queer communities” will be a little smarter than that. Or maybe not.

Whatever
10 months ago
Reply to  LOL

The far-left are simply trying to disguise rent control and cover it up with far-left buzzwords to get it passed. ‘Rent stabilization’ indeed. Hooking this onto the queer community is just an appeal to knee-jerk voters who don’t think for themselves.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago
Reply to  Whatever

“far left” lmfao…. far left is good in this case. The “center” is supporting capitalism and landlord rights. F that

Mars Saxman
10 months ago
Reply to  LOL

Indeed, you can’t fix a supply problem by restricting rent, no matter what you call the policy: when not enough new apartments get built to accommodate everyone who wants to move here, prices are going to rise, and that’s just the way it is. Trying to push that tide backward by force just makes landlords disinvest and developers move elsewhere, so the housing which remains becomes shitty and scarce.

chHill
10 months ago
Reply to  Mars Saxman

Wrong. “Landlords” are not just some universal, naturally existing class of people. The ability to own someone else’s shelter is a political choice by elites who have incentivized the hoarding of property as a commodity for their benefit. Shelter should not be treated as a commodity and should be accessible to the public and should not be pricing people out. Get real.

We’ve been forced to accept this as normal for far too long, and just because you say “that’s just the way it is”, your mentality won’t hold up for very long when you suddenly can’t siphon working people’s incomes to pay off your extra mortgages. This is inevitable. It shouldn’t be financially tenable to be a landlord in today’s world because we have bigger problems to solve in society. Really though, landlords are like…medieval shit. We’ve gotta deal with climate change. GTFO. No one is pushing the tide backwards by arguing against landlords and landlord corruption. In fact, your entire argument is pushing the tide backward by force because there are far more renters who’d loooove rent control than landlords chilling on the money skimmed off their tenants. Rent control is such a tiny positive step and you just complaaaiiinn.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago
Reply to  LOL

It is completely good and not stupid. You are aggressively wrong though. Stop supporting lining your landlords’ pockets.

Local
10 months ago

Hmm. Property tax almost doubled in 5 years, insurance up 50% in a year, interest rates at 7%. If the rent isn’t going up someone is losing money.

Miller Playfield Turf
10 months ago
Reply to  Local

Yep, rents increase when you choose to fund virtually everything by raising property taxes. It’s of course not the only factor in rising housing costs but it plays a huge part.

And yet many in this city continue to think of this revenue stream only affects home owners and landlords.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago

Then pass legislature requiring audits explaining increases and needing a notary or ratifying process. We need to end the days of renters paying a landlord’s extra mortgage for them.

Miller Playfield Turf
10 months ago

If such a tactic were legal it assuredly would’ve been enacted by the previous city council.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago
Reply to  Local

Landlords and corporate CEOs should always be the ones who sacrifice costs.

Stumpy
10 months ago

Remember back in the 90s when city leaders wanted so desperately to make Seattle a “world class city.”? Careful what you wish for. Seattle has been an expensive place to live for a very long time. “Rent stabilization”? Sounds like “rent control” to me which has been shown over and over not to work. Shame on Jamie and Nicole for this latest push for dumb progressive ideas that “everyone ” agrees should happen but actually should not.

chHill
10 months ago
Reply to  Stumpy

Shame on you for making no argument and fear mongering!

Rent control has been shown to work in many situations and contexts, domestically and internationally. Just ask anyone in NYC with a rent controlled apartment if they would want to give it up and rent on the “free market”…answer is no. The only problem with rent stabilized / rent controlled units is there are not enough. You say it’s dumb, but I don’t think most renters would think it’s dumb to pay a fair and stable price for shelter…

You may have been misinformed Stumpy, you might want to look into the benefits of lower rent, though idk how it’s not obvious lol. Or even better, look into public housing and why we only have a limited amount available in the US due to the Faircloth amendment limits on the amount of publicly owned housing available at any given time. It hasn’t changed since 1999…population is rising and housing prices are too, Washington DC and Washington State both have to do something.

Broadway Pedestrian
10 months ago
Reply to  Stumpy

“Shown not to work” sponsored by Landlords and Realtors lol. They fully work well in NYC. Only people mad are republicans and landlords.

Local
10 months ago

The answer will be to sell rental properties. Lots of gain in value, no legal requirement to rent out.

Bubbleator
10 months ago
Reply to  Stumpy

Rent control is flawed but does work for longtime residents.

Your Neighborhood Socialist Nogoodnik
10 months ago

Say what you will about what to do at status quo, yall are eating the exact externality of what a society that cant plant roots and grow together acts like, thinks like, wants to do and will do.

Stumpy
10 months ago

…the exact externally of something something something….WHAT???

10 months ago

instead of trying to build housing on Cap Hill and First Hill for those 0-30% of Seattle’s AMI, why can’t we put that effort into building discounted affordable housing for those 30-65% of Seattle’s AMI? That would start to alleviate housing concerns for LGBTQIA+, restaurant workers, teachers, those staring out in blue-collar positions, and government employees. Cap Hill and First Hill small businesses would thrive and the bars, restaurants, and clubs on Cap Hill would enjoy the extra business generated by having patrons living close bar.