The city is conducting a survey about adding more street trees in areas of Seattle with less than 25% canopy coverage. That includes Capitol Hill which has only about 15.02% coverage, the city says.
Seattle has a goal to achieve at least 30% tree-canopy coverage equitably distributed across the city by 2037. “For many Seattleites, trees are more than just part of the scenery – they’re an essential part of our day-to-day life,” the Seattle Department of Transportation says. “They provide environmental, health, and social benefits, making our communities more sustainable and vibrant. Street trees are important because they improve our public spaces.”

Take the Capitol Hill Street Tree Survey here through May 23rd
In the surveys open through May 23rd, Capitol Hill residents, workers, and visitors are asked to add their thoughts on why they most value street trees, if they would volunteer to plant or help upkeep new trees, and even if they would — gasp! — give up street parking space to add a “large street tree” to the block. (Yes. Yes, CHS would.)
SDOT says it will use the survey results to shape tree planting strategies in the areas of the city identified including South Park, SoDo, Roxhill, and Capitol Hill. Last year, the City of Seattle reported planting over 10,000 trees including about 900 trees planted along streets and sidewalks by the Seattle Department of Transportation boosted by levy funding.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 🖤
Seriously though – why do we need a survey about how people feel about street trees? Are large numbers of people going to say “nah, hate ’em,” then causing the City to not plant any?
Just plant the damned trees.
You must have missed this recent, scintillating discussion by our Intrepid City Council.
https://publicola.com/2025/05/02/privately-owned-trees-are-better-than-trees-in-parks-and-public-spaces-councilmembers-argue/
Upvote that but have to ask, are you new to Seattle?
Upvote? This aint reddit lol
Let me rephrase: “In general, I support the comments of the OP.” There. Happy now Chi Chi?
I took the survey and thought the same thing about it before seeing your comment! Haha. Agree we should just plant a lot of trees and take care of them.
X 3. The only question that seemed survey-worthy, and potentially controversial, was around whether or not we’re OK sacrificing a few parking spots to allow for larger/more trees.
As long as they choose some that are resistant to the copious amounts of urine (both dog and… otherwise) and other things that may crop up around them.
Have you tried not whining and crying about basic things in a city?
wow…you are damaged goods.
I hope you figure it out befor eyou go. Some people don’t.
This is great – let’s get some more trees up in here!
More street trees on every street and a concerted push to bury power lines. I am baffled that we spent hundreds of millions of dollars digging up and rebuilding Madison but somehow still have power lines that will block trees from growing or have them completely mangled as they grow.
Just plant the trees. Just build the buildings. END SEATTLE PROCESS NOW!
YES ARGHHHHH ALL CAPS!!!!