
Questions from the parks department survey
Seattle Parks officials say they hope to hand off a report to the mayor’s office by the first week of December on plans to reopen Seven Hills Park and bring changes and activities to parks across Capitol Hill to address complaints about homeless encampments and crime.
Wednesday’s meeting to gather feedback about possible activation efforts and safety changes to the parks drew a strong turnout to the Garfield Community Center as officials organized the crowd into three circles — one for Seven Hills, one for Broadway Hill Park, and the smallest circle for the tiny but still loved Tashkent Park along Boylston Ave. The process reached an acceptable volume level when the large Seven Hills group was moved to the adjacent “teen room.”
There were consistent themes from those who raised their hands to speak in the circles including stories from a parent afraid to take their child to the park following encampment violence and witnessing an overdose and assisting in a resuscitation, and a general feeling that safety and maintenance work decayed during the pandemic and never recovered.
Ideas included increased maintenance, forming volunteer and “friends of” groups, and, one attendee suggested, “replacing all the dirt” in Seven Hills after years of camping and drug use.
“I think our park is representative of the city,” one neighbor said about Seven Hills.
Most speakers agreed on one thing above all else — please, no permanent fences.
Opposition to the only specific feature included as a possible addition to the spaces in the city’s surveys on the parks was a unifying force on the night.
The city held Wednesday’s meeting as 16th Ave’s Seven Hills Park has been shuttered and fenced-off since September after “bouts of negative park activity” and as parks officials say Broadway Hill Park and Tashkent Park have also been the source of frequent calls for the Seattle Police Department.
SPD had a strong presence at the Wednesday meeting with an East Precinct officer assigned to each circle to be part of the discussions and answer questions. Their answer to most issues was to contact East Precinct Crime Prevention Coordinator Joe Elenbaas.
Representatives from the city’s Unified Care Team in charge of encampment clearances were also planned to be part of the groups. Joy Hollingsworth, District 3’s representative on the Seattle City Council attended the session, and listened on the edge of the circles.
Parks department officials at Wednesday night’s meeting made it clear that some issues around the process to overhaul the parks are out of their hands. The permanent fencing idea? “That was a decision made above us,” one facilitator said.
With a report due to Mayor Bruce Harrell and SPD Chief Shon Barnes in a few weeks, parks officials gathered feedback on ideas around neighborhood partnerships with businesses and organizations to bring events and clean-ups to the spaces along with possible activity programming.
Some attendees raised frustrations and fears that have built around the challenged parks as department officials said encampments and crime have had a snowballing effect of making maintenance and safety work more difficult and, thus, making the parks more likely to be used for encampments and drug use. More than one Seven Hills neighbor Wednesday night described what they believed to have been dead bodies removed from encampments over the years though King County Medical Examiner records show no deaths recorded at the location.
Surprisingly, Capitol Hill’s most challenged public space is a model for the effort. Cal Anderson Park remains a post-pandemic challenge for the city but officials say the model of partnerships with a strong core community group in the Cal Anderson Park Alliance and events and clean-ups sponsored by area businesses and organizations like Capitol Hill development and real estate firm Hunters Capital have helped improve safety conditions around the neighborhood’s large central park. CHS reported here in 2024 as those efforts around Cal Anderson were ramped up.
Much of what was heard Wednesday about Capitol Hill’s smaller challenged parks was agreement that something needs to be done as the city’s ongoing crisis situation around homelessness and addiction transforms life in Seattle.
“Our commons is being taken over by a small group of people,” one neighbor said.
Another attendee pointed out the irony of any attempt to bring traditional activity programming to Seven Hills, Broadway Hill, or Tashkent, saying they worried “about a tango night in the park” while there are people struggling nearby.
There was also frustration that Seattle Parks and the city have taken almost no action around the park officials decided to fence-off. There has been no work done inside the Seven Hills fences as officials said Wednesday they are waiting for the public process to play out. Problems in the area in the meantime are not getting any better.
“People are still sleeping at Seven Hills Park,” a neighbor said. “They’re just on the sidewalk outside the fence.”
The city has extended the time the fences will remain up at Seven Hills through late December.
You can learn more about the city’s planning and find the parks department’s surveys for the three Capitol Hill parks here. There is no listed cutoff date for the surveys but the parks department plans to report on the process by early December.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 🖤


Does “Problem” mean homeless and poor? What a joke… community meetings should be reserved for how to get these people houses, not how to keep them away. We are so ass-backwards.
So tired of the false equivalence of poor people with drug users camping in the parks… I have no problem want to keep them away.
So you’re cool with just poor non drug using homeless?
they are not the ones refusing services and camping in parks…
Neither are some of the other groups either. You saying they are all 100% clean sober and no crime records?
Try to make some sense Smooth…
These are criminals and are not our neighbors. They steal, menace people, smoke and shoot up in front of kids and on and on. The ones that tend to camp most brazenly in the parks are not the ones trying to just exist, they are the ones that think they are God’s Own Addicts.
I have had numerous unpleasant interactions around Capitol Hill since Covid with these types. These aren’t the semi embarrassed heroin users of prior decades that shuffle away in silence and go nod off in a corner, not at all. These types think they are owed something.
You house them and what? They burn down the apartment, or leave a faucet on, and ruin everybody’s else’s experience. You can’t house people with severe addictions and serious anti-society tendencies.
The only solution is involuntary commitment or a bus somewhere else. These people do not want “help” and they cannot be helped.
Well, when you have a building full of straw men, one is likely to catch on fire.
Only if you keep leaving the gaslight on
Modern fire codes will prevent the fires. It’ll be okay…pick something new to feign anger at
The one addict would save her because the faucet is always on. And sprinklers throughout the building. Triggered by the fire alarms and extinguishers on every floor including a hose!
But that shit? Is going to EXPODE! There’s a meth lab next door and the police won’t do anything about it!
You sound like MAGA people talking about Mexicans. Stop.
You sound like someone who hates everyone who has an opinion different from yours – oh wait, that sounds like MAGA too?!
Seriously, stop accosting people for having an opinion and voicing their concerns based on what they’ve experienced. Could they sometimes be communicated in a less divisive way or as a more nuanced statement? Sure. But once you’ve been exposed to the nastiness constantly and nothing ever changes (or gets worse), that can become someone’s sole reality (and I’ve experienced this too). Stop putting words into people’s mouths just so you can berate them and feel superior.
The reality is, and I’ve seen it over roughly the last ten years every day, that the majority of people roaming through these parks consists of roughly the same drug users/mentally ill people/etc who continue to show antisocial behaviour, to put it mildly (I could be more explicit and give you examples but what’s the point, you’re not interested in listening anyway). Anyone who claims they don’t do any harm to themselves, others around them or our environment (parks, apartment buildings, cars, …) is completely ignorant of the day to day reality. No I don’t, like tiffany, accept those as our neighbours. They won’t magically recover and become “normal” (however you want to define that) ever again through the solutions we have available or are planning to build today.
And before you’re trying to put words in my mouth as well – having said all of that does not mean I’m a homeless hater. I hate what they do to our neighbourhoods. I would love for there to be solutions, they may just not be what you have in mind. We can and should ask for real solutions and progress towards betterment.
Ya can’t jail them. Ya can’t move them to somewhere else.
Okay? What’s the plan then?
Kinda true. In that the false narratives are very similar.
“or leave a faucet on, and ruin everybody’s else’s experience.”
Oh c’mon man! come on!
I think it is counterproductive to be for people living in parks. This is the lesson the far left in Seattle doesn’t get, no one will be on board with this. Luckily we had a candidate for mayor who doesn’t say shit like you say.
Unfortunately that person didn’t win so Jesse’s pov will be the model going forward.
I’m still not over it. I am dramatized and traumatized from the Bruce experience. From the MAGA experience.
You are traumatized from Bruce?
Thinking that having Bruce as a mayor is a “MAGA experience” is incredibly insulting, lacks empathy, and is incredibly privileged when compared to what other people are going through in the US.
I am not sure what q-anon like memo you have been receiving but you might want to tap the hate the breaks.
lol…a little sarcasm. But since you think it’s all serious? okayyy
Mass surveillances and a police force out of control. That’s not MAGA?
I could go on.
It is counterproductive. It’s just your guy lost because his plan is obviously counterproductive. You say so yourself.
How very NIMBy, privilege speaking as an observer who can prescribe solutions without facing the risk personally which reflects material security, as well as needs.
Perhaps consider attending the meeting with an ear towards listening to others?
How is NIMBY associated with “House them all in my neighborhood”? Look around yo? One minute they complain about how progressive we are and the amount of voters who are active. HOWEVER! Spreading it is completely out of the question! That liberal tends to get on everything around it and then they take over and burn everything and assault everyone!
Very MAGA attitude. Is that you or?
So when the meth addicts chased my wife and four year old with a used needle through the Arboretum playfield, she should have stopped and given them a lecture on where and how to secure free housing versus calling the police? Ok, got it…
(Sarcasm incoming) She should also have invited them for a cup of tea and to camp out in your backyard.
I’m sorry that happened to her, but that just tells you how ignorant some people around here are, and for whatever reason don’t want to comprehend what’s going on every day, even if there’s documented stories about the madness. If you complain or dare to speak up, you’re somehow the problem. I don’t get it.
really? point me to that case number please?
“Does “Problem” mean homeless and poor?”
If we are worried about the poor, and lower middle class, how about we provide clean and safe public transit, green spaces, sidewalks…. These are the people that are hurt most.
NOOOOO!
Because , yunno,,,, THOSE people will just go THERE! (and we don’t like to spend tax dollars on anything).
We can not have an overabundance of democracy! These people are never going to pay a landlord rent and will need subsidized housing!
heheheh…There’s a wine Mom in Leschi having a stroke now I hope.
Yeah man…The issue is they truly believe in what they are saying. Including the legit/justified part. They are TOLD this stuff in the media. Here’s your position. Here’s the preemptive attack on the libs who will disagree. Here’s your argument why.
That’s what they are fed. So they feel very confident in their views.
The problem? They never get, nor hear it when they get it, from the other side. Like Jess Tarlov on the Five on FOX ‘news’. Great example. Buffoons like Watters hold sway over simple facts. Right there in real time. Greg Gutfeld always interjects. And year after year? The lib views die on the vine. THAT is how brainwashed they are.
Something as basic as “Nazi bad” or “Illegal orders are illegal” is not recognized. They all argue the opposite. Just because MAGA light doesn’t see it? Is their issue. Ours to avert, quell, mollify, nullify until the dragon is dead.
Yes. Those of us with children living in small apartments really depend on safe and clean and usable parks. I don’t want folks shuffled from park to park or sidewalk. But I don’t think anyone should be living in our parks or using in our parks
Lol, they are touting Cal Anderson Park’s success as a solution for these other parks rather than acknowledging that action immediately preceded the increase in encampments in places like Seven Hills, Tashkent, William’s Place, and Broadway Hill.
We just need another round of musical chairs and everyone will be a winner!
Any bets on which park that doesn’t have a problem now will have one soon?
IKR?
Yes, we’d love to see everyone in permanent housing. Problem is money and time to build it all.
We can build roofs. Simple shelter from the snow and rain for tent spots. Work some kinda sanitation and 24/7 onsite help.
Be creative with the open spaces. It’s only temporary. It’s inexpensive and solves an issue as fast as anyone could hope for.
It’s not temporary. If we’re going to start giving away free and subsidized housing for anyone willing to shack up in a park than every park will be full tomorrow.
I am talking sooper temporary. A carport is too much? A garage? Something with a roof to keep from the weather. The heat and cold is another issue for later. But falling from the sky is another issue entirely.
We already have a giant roof in the form of the elevated sections of I5.
Reoppening the jungle is the interm solution until we develop real ones
NOT THERE!!!!!! Somewhere a place can like a church?
Like this idea, but how about we put them in Madison Park, not in places where poor and lower middle class people live.
Sure…Near a bus for services is all. Give them ORCA cards.
First Hill Park – it’s a small quarter-block park that is perfect for setting up tents!
Seems like part of the fence has come down. I enjoyed sitting on a bench today wilst eating a sandwich. What a luxurious park experience, 5 stars on yelp
5 out of 100?…lol
Very worried things could only get worse as federal funds are cut… would love to know Seattle’s plan to handle that.
Tax the wealthy.
Can CHS please stop referring to Capitol Hill as a neighbourhood? It is much larger than that. It is a *district* with, at least, several neighbourhoods. While both terms are a little vague in the disUSA, many cities around the world refer to similar land masses / population areas as boroughs, districts or arrondissements and even Seattleites refer to our largest Asia-focused area here as the International District.
We can better highlight and discuss the specifics if we start by utilizing more-easy-to-understand, better-defined references to hone in on actual neighbourhoods (e.g. North Capitol Hill versus the districts that encompass them and other neighborhoods as well). Just saying, can we evolve?
Consistency, logic and exactitude matter, especially in reporting. CHS Blog, set a new, better standard.
Sounds a bit outsider to me…Yunno how many people live in the “Nightlife District” which used to be “The Arts District” a couple years back. Logic? nawww…It’s “Outsider logic”
A problem for community gardens is when drug users discard used sharps in garden plots. Sure, we know the protocol for collecting sharps safely but when the plot used for growing food to be donated to food bank is a favorite hiding space for discarding sharps… there are health risks. That’s not the only place sharps are discarded but you really have to be alert while in the park.