The first ever District 3 election will be remembered as one of the most expensive knock-down, drag-out fights in Seattle City Council history. In the final days of the race, the two D3 candidates and their financial backers are putting a lot of time and money into getting out the vote and overstuffing your mailbox. If you haven’t done so already, skim through CHS election coverage, fill in your ballot, slap a stamp on it, and drop it in the mail by Tuesday.
One of those mailers from the Pamela Banks campaign is getting some extra attention for using stock photos to portray supporters of City Council member Kshama Sawant. As the Seattle Times reported, one picture from a stock photo service is titled “serious young man blank expression.” The mailer has some harsh criticism for Sawant, including by former East Precinct Advisory Committee chair Stephanie Taschida, who says Sawant isn’t interested in addressing gun violence.
Sawant’s campaign materials have focused on calling out Banks for her pro-business backers, both direct and indirect through independent expenditures. The Hospitality PAC recently reported spending $19,000 to support Banks and District 1 candidate Shannon Braddock, according to state Public Disclosure Commission records. Another group, Neighbors for Banks, recently spent $18,000 of its $23,000 on get out the vote mailers and calls. The pro-Sawant group ProgressiveSeattlePAC has raised nearly $23,000.
Candidates are prohibited from having any direct interaction with independent expenditure groups. Banks said she opposes the group that’s rallied behind her and called on Sawant to do the same. Sawant has refused, arguing her union-backed PAC funded by workers is not the same as the pro-Banks group.
The campaigns are doing just fine raising money on their own. Direct contributions to the Sawant campaign continue to soar, pushing her total amount raised to nearly $430,000. Banks trails behind with $382,000 raised as of Friday, according to City campaign contribution data.
Banks is attempting to close an 18-point primary deficit. The results of any polling going on in the district has been kept quiet. The CHS District 3 Mood Meter remains neutral for both candidates — though the splits are telling with strong positives and negatives and almost nobody in the middle for Sawant.
Both campaigns have been waging a war of words over who has taken the more righteous path to making District 3 the richest City Council race this year. And despite the back-and-forth over business contributions, both candidates have tried to court small business votes in the final month of the campaign. Sawant drew the most attention in calling for a small business rent control as Banks proposed creating a small business lending program.
Recently, the candidates sparred over a comment Banks made in an interview, in which she said Sawant lacked an understanding of Seattle’s African American community. Sawant confronted her about it in a KUOW debate, claiming Banks was implying an immigrant wasn’t qualified to represent the district, a claim Banks strongly rejected.
While District 3 includes a slew of neighborhoods, both campaigns are burning the midnight oil at their respective Capitol Hill headquarters. Sawant’s Socialist Alternativealigned staff have been working out of a 10th Ave E house for several months while largely Democratic Banks staff moved into an office above Little Uncle at 15th and Madison.
The campaigns will stay close to Capitol Hill for their election night parties, as well. Banks will take over 18th Ave E U’s Tougo Coffee and Bannister while Sawant will be at her usual party spot inside Melrose Market Studios.
In criticizing Banks for the use of “stock photos” in her campaign ad, Sawant is clearly getting desperate. What difference does it make? The ad does not claim that the people in those photos are the ones who made the quotes….the latter are attributed to other community members. Nothing deceptive, at all.
Well, it deceived me. The headline “Kshama Sawant Won’t Meet With the People She Represents” appears just above the heads of five unhappy-looking people staring straight at the camera, giving the clear impression that these are the specific people the headline is referring to, while not showing the two actual people quoted. That said, election porn is election porn. I’ve seen worse.
Sawant trying to spin Banks’s comment as anti-immigrant sure sounds desperate to me.
Who’s desperate? Banks can’t even find district constituents to do a photo shot for her. ;)
Banks had to stop putting real constituents in her ads because those people were getting harassed by Sawants over zealous followers. Can’t wait for Sawant to be gone. Banks all the way.
If anyone actually cares about this district, its Banks all the way.
I agree. Banks all the way. I can’t stand Sawant.
Banks is a terrible solution to the problems of this area. You might not like Sawant but Banks is amateur hour – just looking at her website there are so few actual policy recommendations to address the issues of District 3.
I live off Broadway, and so far have received 8 (not exaggerating) Sawant mailers, and zero Banks mailers. I have no idea what they are doing with their campaign funds.
Somehow one of Sawant’s people got into our building a few weeks ago and was going door to door trying to get support or a list of people that don’t support her. I’m not sure which.
TV.
TV money is loser money in my opinion. The fact that district 3 has the highest vote count so far makes me feel that Savant should be happy.
I’ve moved off the hill recently and out of Seattle, but still had my ballot forwarded.
I voted by filling in one and only one thing – I voted against Sawant.
You are a gentleman and a scholar.
What pm said.
I also voted against Sawant, but isn’t that illegal to vote where you no longer live and have no intention of returning to?
Tougo Coffee and Bannister Wine and Charcuterie and Event space are in the Central District. just and FYI
updated :)
I held my nose and voted for Sawant today. I absolutely despise her and her followers’ divisiveness and black-and-white world views.
It was a shame Pamela Banks presented herself as a suburban NIMBY with a 1960s worldview, and one that an ordinary city-dweller who just wants safe neighborhoods, modern public transit, and the ability to walk and bike around town couldn’t realistically vote for.
I see her website has been reflects (or has been updated with) a more modern platform, but when she opposes a life-saving road diet on 23rd, argues that you can’t support multiple transportation modes on the same street (aka: known as a ‘complete street’ in urban planning 101 circles), etc, she’s automatic fail for me.
Maybe next time we’ll get a viable alternative to Sawant.
I kind of feel the same way about Sawant, but choosing her over Banks wasn’t difficult. Yes, she’s strident and abrasive and I wouldn’t particularly want to hang out with her (or her fan club) socially, but that shouldn’t be a deal-breaker since she’s gotten real results on issues that the council has ignored or punted on for decades. Banks strikes me as the sort of earnest 1970s liberal suburbanite-at-heart that has run Seattle since, well, the 1970s. She wouldn’t be awful (I’d vote for her over, say, Tim Burgess) but I don’t think she’d do much to change today’s political dynamic, especially on the issues related to economic inequality. Even if she possesses the knowledge to do so, she just doesn’t seem to have the passion or ideological commitment.
If you had asked me the first time I voted for sawant whether I thought I would do it again, the answer would have been absolutely! But her inaccessibility and lack of knowledge about local issues have been disappointing. It was unbelievable to hear her say at a meeting that she didn’t know enough about the violence at midtown center to comment.
It makes perfect sense when you consider it in context. A big portion of the base she panders to probably don’t even know where it is. It’s part of that “big scary CD” they never venture into.