Tuesday, multiple South Seattle public schools were under “shelter in place” security protocols after unconfirmed reports immigration agents were in the area to target families near the campuses.
As the Trump administration’s ICE battles are felt in Seattle, worries about how the city’s police — and their technology — respond to federal agents is a top concern at City Hall. A planned expansion of the city’s Real Time Crime Center camera system to include parts of Capitol Hill and the Central District is a key area of worry.
Despite the street disorder and public safety issues the new cameras are hoped to address, calls to put the expansion on hold have the mayor’s ear.
Mayor Katie Wilson shares the concerns and is “currently reviewing options,” the mayor’s office told CHS late Tuesday about a pause.
Wilson says she is sorting out what is possible including a proposal from Seattle City Councilmember Eddie Lin to stop the approved and funded expansion and redirect funding to help immigrant communities targeted in the Department of Homeland Security crackdown.
District 3 Councilmember Joy Hollingsworth representing Capitol Hill and the Central District where the new cameras will be located, has supported the Real Time Crime Center growth and joined Mayor Bruce Harrell last year in his push to include the area around the Central District’s Garfield High School in the expansion.
Hollingsworth said Tuesday she is “open to a conversation” about a pause but continues to support the community public safety effort that she says buoyed to Garfield area camera plan in the first place.
“I don’t want people’s civil liberties to be infringed upon,” Hollingsworth told CHS Tuesday, “and I also understand the current public safety challenges right now.”
Hollingsworth said Tuesday she has not spoken to Lin about his proposal and did not have an official timeline for installation of the Capitol Hill and Central District cameras.
In the early process of creating the first SPD Real Time Crime Center camera systems along Aurora Ave, 3rd Ave, and in the International District, the hardware was installed and operational about nine to twelve months after the council’s approval. That would put the expansion on track for implementation this summer or early fall.
The Burner reported here on the plea to Wilson and City Hall from the new South Seattle representative on the council. “We should reconsider increased data collection and consider if these millions of dollars could be much better spent on immigration defense and providing resources to our immigrant communities – residents who are sharing their fear to even leave their homes to go to school or work or the grocery store, all due to ICE’s campaign of terror,” Lin told The Burner.
CHS reported here in September as the council approved SPD’s Real Time Crime Center camera expansion including final debate about data privacy and how SPD says it will handle any potential legal wrangling with outside agencies like ICE.
Seattle Schools letter to families about Tuesday’s shelter in place alerts
The Capitol Hill camera boundaries will cover the core of the Pike/Pine neighborhood along E Pike and E Pine between Broadway and 12th Ave with a mapped extension along Nagle Place and Broadway north of the core all the way to Denny/E Barbara Bailey Way and the southern edge of Capitol Hill Station and its Sound Transit security camera installations. The camera zone would stretch to the backside of Pike/Pine along E Union.
In the Central District, the Harrell administration and Hollingsworth pushed for the camera system to be centered around safety at Garfield High School but with boundaries running from a block north of the school along E Cherry all the way to S Jackson. The western edge will include 20th Ave and the eastern edge would extend along 26th Ave.
The additions will expand the SPD Real Time Crime Center surveillance camera system to include the Capitol Hill nightlife core around E Pike and Cal Anderson Park and a major swath of the Central District from E Cherry to Jackson police officials say is necessary to prevent gun violence.
The SPD camera expansion will also include adding the installations to the city’s Stadium District around Lumen Field and T-Mobile park — expected to happen in time for the World Cup.
The city already operates more than 350 traffic cameras across its streets. SPD’s current three-location RTCC system includes 57 cameras, the city says.
The Capitol Hill system is estimated to cost around $400,000 to install and $35,000 a year to operate. The Central District installation has a budget of $425,000 and also an estimated $35,000 in “ongoing annual costs.”
While not yet operational here, East Precinct officers make regular requests of RTCC analysts for information about suspicious vehicles or suspect photographs from the center’s databases. With the Real Time Crime Center’s current limited footprint, most of those East Precinct requests currently go unfilled.
Officials Tuesday were sorting out where SPD and the city’s tech crews were in the installation process.
Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck who was one of two votes against the approved camera expansion in September, says it is her understanding the cameras for the expansion were purchased in December, “but they have not yet arrived.”
The citywide council rep says she hopes Wilson will see this as the right time to pause — delivered or not.
“As someone who voted against the CCTV pilot expansion, I fully support pausing the CCTV pilot program and repurposing those funds to meet our urgent community needs,” Rinck tells CHS.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 🖤
YES! THIS is exactly what we voted for. Stop letting these thugs get all this extra access to spy on citizens. Also throw away your panopticon Ring cameras too.
I live within the proposed CD expansion area, and I can’t for the life of me see how adding cameras here would do anything but invade my and my neighbors’ privacy. This area is almost exclusively residential and putting a CCTV camera system here is a literal active threat to the BIPOC communities who live here.
I personally don’t think surveillance tech solves any of the factors that lead to urban crime (it just creates more), but I could at least see an argument for why a stadium or municipal buildings would have some kind of CCTV system…but a neighborhood of single family homes and apartments? Are they fn perverted or something?? We’re just living our lives here, enjoying our city, and doing so while not expecting to have all our outdoor time subject to police, and thus ICE, surveillance.
This is a very diverse part of the city, and ICE has shown that it is simply an outgrowth of the KKK and will act accordingly. And meanwhile, SPD can barely contain their racist and homophobic vitriol within the department, so in what world would they defend this neighborhood from racist and homophobic ICE overreach through data requests? THEY’VE ALREADY KILLED INNOCENTS. The people who join ICE, the SPD, and the wealthy powers that be HATE this neighborhood and everything it stands for, and those entities will start selling out the citizens living here as soon as they know they can get away with it. If we have this camera system go through, I will not be surprised when the CD looks like north Minneapolis, jack-booted Nazi thugs and all.
I agree filming single family homes is bad idea though I’m not sure of specific placement. This area includes 23rd & Jackson which is a well known hot spot. This area also has some of the most gun violence in the city including an incident where a daycare was hit my gunfire in recent memory. It’s reasonable to have cameras in the area
Remember, this was supposed to be an alternative to shot spotter. Frankly, too many childless people fight every public safety measure over misplaced tribal affiliation. It’s more ACAB than BLM.
I also live within the boundary of the proposed CD expansion, and came here to say what you’ve largely already written. Your neighbors largely agree, with the occasional exception of new residents who don’t seem interested in connecting with the existing community they are now surrounded by.
Joy is a nice person but yet again, listening more to the louder, more powerful voices in the political sphere. It’s much harder to amplify the individuals who will be most impacted.
City Council President needs to take a stand for D3. Joy has listened to all of d3 that wants to talk to her, she made a vote. Now she needs to be loud for our safety
Also how isn’t there national headlines “gun fight @ Trader Joe’s 4 blocks from Mayors Home”
Probably because there wasn’t a gun fight at Trader Joe’s. There was one single shot, and no apparent victim.
National headlines”? Is that serious thought? Or sarc?
Whose safety are you concerned about?
I agree pausing placing the cameras is a good idea considering how horrible ICE is. However, taking the money dedicated for the cameras and ‘redirect funding to help immigrant communities’ is a hell no,until it is thoroughly detailed what “help’ is. I did some research on studies to see the affectiveness of using cameras and it is a mix bag, and a lot of poorly designed studies. I could see placing them at Garfield HS is probably sensible. But again not until ICE thugs are under control. I can say as a pedestrian, I have noticed the difference between those intersections with and without cameras.
Maybe cameras are bad but maybe they are good is such a perfect Hollingsworth non-response!
Good that our new council president is such a strong waffler, that kind of meek indecisive non-leadership and inaction is exactly what us centrist voters love to see!
This conversation feels like yet another example of white people telling people of color what we should do. Who is actually being killed in these shootings? Young Black men.
I know Katie wants to turn this into an ICE issue and position herself as a savior, but let’s be real, this is about crime and Black youth being killed around Garfield. Full stop.
Being an ally is not the same as being a savior. These cameras have nothing to do with ICE. We want our neighborhoods to be safe.
I know there are people on this site who don’t like it when I speak up, almost all of them white, but I don’t care. I’m Black, I’m proud, and I don’t need gentrification or outsiders telling me what’s best for my community. We need save our youth! This has been an issue way before ICE and now Katie wants to use it as an excuse.
At least two murders would’ve been caught on camera if this system.were in place to my knowledge. The real time crime center has been effective in catching violent criminals and we should not be negatively polarized into putting our own public safety at risk. I’m aware of license plate readers and the feds accessing that and how states are trying to address it. I have not heard of a single case of ICE using municipal CCTV footage and we should design practices that make it impossible rather than comprising public safety in dense commercial areas with high relative crime.