Seattle readying domestic worker ‘bill of rights’ with minimum wage for nannies, house cleaners

With reporting by SCC Insight

Thursday, a Seattle City Council committee will begin working on a “domestic workers’ bill of rights,” a new ordinance that sets rules for nannies, house cleaners, gardeners, and more including a minimum wage and rest breaks.

Teresa Mosqueda is sponsoring the “domestic workers’ bill of rights” ordinance that establishes several rights and protections for domestic workers in Seattle.

Under the ordinance, a “domestic worker” is someone who provides services to an individual or household in a private home, and whose primary occupation is nanny, house cleaner, home care worker, gardener, cook, and/or household manager. It includes both hourly and salaried employees, as well as independent contractors, full-time and part-time workers, and temp workers. It does not include:

  • Someone working on a casual basis (irregular, uncertain or incidental; and different from the worker’s regular occupation);
  • Someone with a family relationship with the employer;
  • A live-in worker;
  • A home care worker paid with public funds.

The ordinance sets a minimum wage for domestic workers equivalent to the “schedule 2” employers under the city’s minimum wage ordinance, which is the rate for employers with less than 500 employees. That is currently $11.50 per hour, with annual increases through 2024.

It also sets rules for rest breaks. Domestic workers must get a 30-minute meal break for every five consecutive hours of work. They must also get a 10-minute rest break for every four consecutive hours worked, but the break must occur before the fourth hour – it can’t be stuck at the end of the four hours.  This parallels state rulesfor rest and meal breaks.

The ordinance also specifies that employers may not retain any of the worker’s original documents (such as their passport or other immigration documents). Unscrupulous employers will often do this to force employees to keep working for them despite low/nonexistent pay and intolerable working conditions. And the ordinance prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who file complaints with the city over violations of the ordinance – in particular, it prohibits reporting or threatening to report someone to immigration officials in retaliation for filing a complaint.

As for remedies, there are different ones specified depending upon the offense. For compensation-related violations, the ordinance awards full unpaid compensation plus interest for an employer’s first violation of the ordinance, and double compensation plus interest for subsequent violations. It also lays out increasing civil penalties for violations: $500 per aggrieved party for the first violation, $1000 for the second violation, and up to $5000 per subsequent violation. Though for compensation-related ones it allows the city to waive the penalties if the unpaid compensation is paid within 15 days of the ruling as encouragement to get money into the workers’ hands as fast as possible.

The ordinance grants a private right of action for workers who have suffered financial harm against employers who violate the rules, so that a domestic worker may file suit to be made whole. The right of action includes attorneys’ fees and other legal costs, which is intended to encourage attorneys to take domestic workers’ cases even if the amount of money the worker is entitled to is relatively small.

Finally, the ordinance creates a Domestic Workers’ Standards Board to advise the city on issues related to “the legal protections, benefits, and working conditions for domestic worker industry standards.” The board is initially 9 members, growing to 13 in 2020. Four members are appointed by the Mayor, four by the City Council, and one by the other Board members. The Board will contain both domestic workers and employers of domestic workers.

This Thursday morning, Mosqueda will hold the first public discussion on the proposed ordinance in her committee.


Appreciate CHS? Subscribe Today  Consider becoming a subscriber at $1/$5/$10 a month to help CHS provide community news. Help push us over the 800 mark. You can also sign up for a one-time annual payment.

Already a subscriber? Please TELL A FRIEND to help us reach our goal.


Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

8 thoughts on “Seattle readying domestic worker ‘bill of rights’ with minimum wage for nannies, house cleaners

  1. Hah. Feel good ordinance for “tax Amazon with no plan” Teresa.. If I could find a housekeeper for $15/hr I might actually hire one. They typically charge double that, at a minimum.

  2. Where can I find a gardener for $15/hr? I’d gladly pay $20/hr for one but that is impossible.

    I also don’t understand how the rest and meal breaks are enforced. Often, these positions are unsupervised – doing their work while the property owner is at work or elsewhere.

  3. Meal and rest breaks for baby sitters – so who watches the kids during those times? And if our sitter doesn’t get a ten minute break she can sue us?

    This is another ordinance written by SEIU, whose workers are no doubt exempted.

  4. Ummm. So theoretically I’m in favor. The wages laid out here seem well below going rate for nannies and housekeepers. The documents and retaliation provisions are a gimme – that should definitely happen.

    The break schedule though is totally unworkable for nannies. I would love to do this for our nanny. Heck, I would love to do it for MYSELF when I’m home with the kids. But in practice, how does it happen?

  5. This is nuts. Workers without work authorization are not going to self report problems to the City. To enforce this, they’ll need official paper trail. This bill is not enforceable and will cost a lot of money to administer. Besides gig workers who work under the table to avoid paying taxes are not going to sign up for this.

    So what’s the point again?

  6. Mosqueda: eliminate heroin syringes littering Seattle gardens Seattle first. Your friends at King County Health give away millions of heroin syringes that end up in parks, gardens, and the streets of Seattle. Like the rest of the Council, Teresa Moqeueda is a total failure at proper governance. The police department is in shambles, the City Employees Pension Fund is in the bottom percentile nationally, SDOT is a failure, and heroin and meth addicts are run amok. Start there Teresa, you idiot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *