Post navigation

Prev: (12/02/21) | Next: (12/03/21)

Seattle looking for organizations to help shape ‘one of the largest participatory budgeting undertakings in the nation’

Just before Thanksgiving, Seattle City Hall wrapped up its $7.1 billion 2022 spending plan. Along the way, officials touted increased spending on the city’s three major crises: affordable housing, homelessness and addiction, and COVID-19 recovery. But plenty of community priorities were left behind.

The City of Seattle is now looking for help shaping the next step in trying to make sure more of those priorities make the final plan. This week, the formal “request for proposals” went out for “organizations and coalitions to provide administrative and consulting services” to assist in planning a new “participatory budgeting” process in Seattle that will begin with a $28 million funding package.

CHS reported in June on the Seattle City Council’s actions to move forward with a participatory budgeting plan in the city’s Office of Civil Rights. The vote moved forward a $30 million package hoped to address inequity by creating a system of more direct control of community spending in Seattle. CHS reported here on the plan and the Black Brilliance Research Project born out of last year’s Black Lives Matter protests in Seattle.

“After the protests following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, calls to acknowledge the systematic harm done to Black communities resulted in numerous proposals coming from BIPOC organizations on how to invest in community safety through funding for housing, education, and healthcare directly back into the community instead of policing,” the city’s statement on the opening of the application process for helping to administrate the planning process. “This participatory budgeting process is one result of this community organizing and activism and will be one of the largest participatory budgeting undertakings in the nation.”

The Office of Civil Rights will select one proposal for funding. After proposals are submitted, a rating panel comprised of community members and city staff will “review, rate, and make final selection recommendations based on the evaluation criteria.”

The request includes a set of priority criteria for interested organizations:

  • Demonstrated capacity and experience to conduct a citywide PB Program with actionable recommendations for the City to make decisions resulting in community investments.
  • A strong connection to communities historically and currently impacted by police violence, including the Black community.
  • Sustained commitment to work with and for historically and currently marginalized communities, and in collaboration with local organizations/coalitions led by Black, Indigenous, and communities of color in building power and local capacity for this citywide PB Program; uplifting BIPOC queer and transgender leadership to build solidarity.
  • A commitment to address internalized oppression, affirming all identities, and values ending all forms of oppression, which include racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, and misogyny.

SOCR director Mariko Lockhart will make the final award decision based on recommendations by the review panel.

The full Request for Proposal can be found here.

 

$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻 

Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍 

 
 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jane Otter
Jane Otter
3 years ago

“Participatory budget” is one of those funny misnomers because it means “budget made by people nobody participated in voting for”. It solves the problem of “participation” in this case for people selected based on ideology rather than merit or any sort of democratic process.

L A
L A
3 years ago

As long as this budget does NOT include reduction in police force. We’ve proven easily and historically that we cannot police ourselves. That’s how four people got shot during that period of riots/demonstrations. Replace those cops with problematic records/behavior – but don’t leave this city’s citizens without any kind of protection or crime resolution. Sorry uber-liberals, it’s not about your agenda, it’s about what the ENTIRE city needs, *including* smaller interest and persecuted groups.

Let's be honest
Let's be honest
3 years ago

The selection criteria almost reads like a parody of leftist gobbledygook…

“A strong connection to communities historically and currently impacted by police violence, including the Black community.”

How about just communities impacted by violence? I’m sure violence within those communities exceeds that from police in Seattle by at least 50 times.

Ministry of Truth
Ministry of Truth
3 years ago

Also know as cronyism

Kevin
Kevin
3 years ago

I was looking for the right word and you nailed it.

Eddy Spaghetti
Eddy Spaghetti
3 years ago

That is the sound of $30 million in taxpayer money evaporating.

Aaron
Aaron
3 years ago

The $30 M is to pay off “consultants” who will be city hall paid “community” voices. They will identify bigly, but short on any real, meaningful actions.

It’s the usual city hall politics buying $30 M worth of expensive “progressive” gift wrapping.

FollowTheMoney
FollowTheMoney
3 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

Agreed…how many homeless could be helped by redirecting this money toward an actual problem?

Austin
Austin
3 years ago

To the commenters: Man you guys really can’t be pacified. First it’s government mismanages its funds, now you do a complete 180 degree pivot when a small chunk of the budget is proposed to be stewarded by the people directly. Please make up your minds.

June T
June T
3 years ago
Reply to  Austin

“stewarded by the people directly”.
Are you joking? This participatory budget excludes more residents than the usual way budgeting works. And it’s not a small chunk of the budget either. Seeing that it’s being stewarded by “the people” seems to indicate that only BLM activists are “the people”. Apparently the rest of us don’t count.