It was only a year ago that Joy Hollingsworth was making the case that issues of development and growth in Seattle showed why the city needs leadership from someone who has lived with those challenges — even if they haven’t been part of shaping policies and government.
“I can speak to real impact,” Hollingsworth told CHS last year during the campaign as The Stranger attacked the candidate for a letter she had written in 2017 opposing a neighboring microhousing development. “The impact it has had on the real communities. That perspective is important.”
Now, as the District 3 representative finishes her first year in office, Hollingsworth will lead the Seattle City Council’s committee dedicated to finalizing the city’s next 20-year plan for zoning, growth, and development.
Councilmember Hollingsworth will lead the council’s select committee on the Comprehensive Plan in 2025.
“Seattle’s comprehensive plan is an opportunity for us to shape what type of city we want to live in for the next twenty years,” Hollingsworth said Monday.
“Throughout the comprehensive plan, we can create a Seattle that is open to all: a welcoming city where young people just starting out can find stable housing; an affordable city where young families can buy a family home and put down roots; a safe city where children can walk to school through a neighborhood they know and that knows them; an accessible city that nurtures and provides for its older residents to age in place; a city where bus drivers, teachers, artists, paramedics, and all working families can afford to live where they work. In short, a city that generation after generation of Seattleite can call home.”
D3 neighborhood by neighborhood look at the proposed comprehensive plan changes
Hollingsworth is stepping into a leadership role left empty by the decision from District 2 representative Tammy Morales to leave the council amid accusations about the council’s toxicity and politics under Council President Sara Nelson.
Monday, Hollingsworth said she will meet with Morales — and hopes to upkeep many of her values.
“She has been a champion for District 2, and I intend to meet with her and her team before she leaves office early next year to understand her vision for her district and to learn from her experiences,” Hollingsworth said.
Hollingsworth brings a track record of moderate and centrist positions on the council including joining in a vote against the Morales-backed Connected Communities pilot program that would have funded 35 “community-led” affordable housing developments over the next five years.
Her stated approach to development, she says, comes through the prism of growing up in the Central District and watching the displacement and gentrification flipsides of development play out.
“In the decades since my great grandmother first put down roots in the Central District, Seattle has truly grown into a world-class city. With that extraordinary growth has come extraordinary affordability challenges,” Hollingsworth said.
“Seattle now has the ninth-highest cost of living in the United States. Nearly 45% of Seattle renters are cost burdened, and one-third of Seattle households are low-income. The median home in Seattle costs nearly seven times the median annual income,” Hollingsworth said. “This is our chance to make a meaningful impact on the affordability crisis facing our city – for today, and for the future.”
Hollingsworth has also been a solid supporter of Mayor Bruce Harrell who endorsed Hollingsworth last year — and is also a child of the Central District.
His administration’s growth plan would continue to focus the city’s growth in its densest cores of Capitol Hill and the Central District while making small steps forward in allowing multifamily-style housing across the city closer to its wealthiest neighborhoods and waterfront properties.
A coalition of business and community organizations have called for more growth, denser “middle housing,” and more housing near transit in the plan.
While the final comp plan proposal would continue many of the development patterns that have shaped modern Seattle, the changes for the final proposed zoning update show the administration responding to density proponents with changes for the city’s expanses of neighborhood residential zoning that would allow developers to create denser designs — upping the threshold from a .9 floor to area ratio to 1.2 FAR in the final proposal.
Floor area ratio (FAR) is the measurement of a building’s area in relation to the size of the parcel that the building is located on and is widely used as a metric to quantify density.
The majority of the city’s land will remain under its lightest zoning designation Neighborhood Residential Areas like this including North Capitol Hill will shift to accommodate the state’s new middle housing mandate legislation that requires replacing single-family zoning with fourplex zoning while setting a base at sixplexes near frequent transit.
Under the draft plan, the city would have proposed to soften the new state mandate with lower density requirements in areas of the city the Office of Planning and Community Development has identified as at high risk of displacement but the Harrell administration has backed off this and dropped the equity component from its proposal.
The final proposal increases the number of planned Neighborhood Centers to 30 including Madison Park, Madison Valley, Madrona, and Montlake. The Capitol Hill/First Hill Regional Centers will be expanded and have targeted upzones. The Central District Urban Center areas would be expanded.
Nearly 70% of new construction expected under the plan would be constrained to “Regional Centers,” the plan’s new designation for the city’s most densely populated, high transit areas — Downtown, Lower Queen Anne, South Lake Union, University District, Northgate, Ballard, and, of course, First Hill and Capitol Hill — or less dense but still highly developed areas now called “Urban Centers” instead of “Urban Villages.” 23rd Ave from Union to Jackson is one nearby example. The “Madison–Miller” area north of E Madison is another.
Zoning in many of these areas like Capitol Hill would remain capped at eight stories though there could be allowances for taller development near light rail stations.
Under the draft plan, the Capitol Hill-First Hill area of the city is projected to add 9,000 new housing units — second to only downtown — and 3,000 new jobs.
The city will also introduce affordability bonuses in the plan that would allow increased numbers of units in all zones.
There are other small but limited injections of development and “15 minute city” initiatives in the proposal. The plan proposes making stores and small cafes on corners in all residential zones legal again meaning we could see more neighborhood-hugging businesses like the Volunteer Park Cafe across the city.
In the meantime, the city is also in the midst of the long-term planning process to shape the ground-up vision for the comprehensive plan’s Capitol Hill/First Hill Regional Center. CHS reported here on that process that will create a 20-year plan hoped to dovetail with the new comprehensive plan to provide more specific detail on land use in these key areas of the city.
The city has been holding information sessions online and across the city to detail the citywide comprehensive plan proposal and gather feedback.
The complete comprehensive plan update proposal has been posted to Zoning.OneSeattlePlan.com.
Following the public comment period, Hollingsworth and the Seattle City Council will consider Phase 1 of the legislation including Neighborhood Residential updates to implement HB 1110 in spring 2025.
The council will consider the Phase 2 legislation including rezones for new Neighborhood Centers, new and expanded Regional and Urban Centers, and select arterial rezones along frequent transit routes in summer 2025.
HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.
Ah yes, the bottom line business owner councilor who cares only about her net worth and view of Bellevue creating policy on our city’s zoning future. What could go wrong???? Vote her out.
Gasp!!!!! A business owner on Council. Man the barricades!
Last thing we need
No…It’s a SELF DEALING council member who owns a business that will also take $3 an hour from labor forever.
It was supposed to be temporary.
See the difference? Nope. You are out of touch. Labor is not worth what we pay it and YOU are judge, jury and executioner. Sentencing them to rely on people’s charity. As opposed to a living wage. The scare tactics have no basis. Let’s talk about upcoming Trump tax cuts ON TOP of this scam.
I bet you like that don’t ya? As long as govt. gives you money and takes it from someone else? You are fully onboard. Got it.
I just took 2 minutes to look up their company and they have 0 workers listed with L&I.
I disagree with our current councilmember on plenty, but it’s clear that there are 1-2 folks who post here consistently who’ve created a very specific narrative about this person quite literally from day 1 (only cares about big business, in cahoots with Mayor Harrell, etc.).
It’s been so consistent, and honestly bizarre and misinforming (and sometimes borderline racist – particularly linking the only Black people in city government together, despite their differences), that I gotta think it’s the same person cosplaying as a Sawant supporter for entertainment or something.
why??? She’s not your patron saint Sawant? CM Hollingsworth is doing more for the D3 than Sawant ever did during her last term. CM Hollingsworth is returning back to the community she was born and raised and returned to decades ago. What more do you want? Some carpetbagger moving in and winning you over with socialist policies that fail in the US because we don’t have the infrastructure that European nations have had for decades?
Really? Okay…self dealing is your thing. Got it.
No she isn’t lol. Hollingsworth is a fool.
Let me guess, you’re white, right? All these white folks hating on Joy…are you saying that black folks don’t deserve a view? That’s what I think you’re saying. Get over it, she’s black and a woman and you don’t like that, that’s what this is really about…
race card? Really? Have any context? have a concept of one?
There are a few people here who will oppose Joy no matter what she is doing to make D3 a better place. Their opinions are totally predictable, so I suggest that we don’t waste time reading them.
OMG! Folks…Do not let this council claw back all the gains.
“a welcoming city where young people just starting out can find stable housing; an affordable city where young families can buy a family home and put down roots;”
That is a lie. This woman is incapable of anything other than a “yes person”. Give her something to save her for reelection.
Joy’s first move was self dealing. “Small businesses 500 or less employees” would receive $3 an hour less that minimum wage. It’s just tooo cumbersome for “small business owners” like Joy and her donors. As well as the current council. Ditto. The progressives were wiped off the map. Fine. But stealing $3 and hour PERMANENTLY as Joy wanted. It was TEMPORARY due to the $15 an hour minimum wage hike negotiation. Today you can’t hire for $15. But you can force them with exceptions to the law contrary to voters wishes baby!
That’s Joys version of helping us. She can’t go away fast enough.
Stealing? Ever try to make payroll?
If you don’t want to work at a small business, get a job at Starbucks or Amazon or McDonalds and get the higher minimum wage. It might be a more strict job environment.
The two small businesses, one a family llc and the other sp, both were more psychotic than any job since. Sure your shift lead at mickey d’s might be a weird hardass but their dog aint gonna nearly piss on you, theyll laugh about it then ask you to clean it up, and then you quit, and then get blown up for a week with angry, then frantic, then sad and apologetic calls none of which you take. So what the fuck are you on about here?
we subsidise businesses plenty. Via welfare.
gimme a break. Either get a fishing pole or stop with the “do you know how hard it is?” stuff.
500 or less employees is Joy’s business. How convenient. AND the grace period is long over due.
I think that they can’t take responsibility. So band together and take the money from labor. So you can profit. See how that works? People like you keep wages flat for 1/2 a century. You can’t make it w/o slaves like the south right? If we don’t exploit them? I can’t live the way I deserve to. And they deserve to. Have them find a job somewhere else. Right? Back to that trickle down thought? Business superiority? You are now a person. NOT a business. But LGBT you never leave alone. Say “this is temporary and you don’t better yourself therefore only worth what I SAY you are worth. And then the rest you depend on charity!
Whatever. Out of touch or simply greedy. Run it like every other restaurant after wages go up. How’s that? Or find a job if it’s so awesome. How about that? Why does labor ALWAYS sacrifice? They give more of themselves than anyone.
You Sawantists have been on the attack of CM Hollingsworth since she first stepped into that role.
I am not a awanty or whatever. I was not even in the district and wouldn’t vote for her. I will fight for mainstream progressive values. Not the socialist one. I am a USMC vet. The most socialist place in America. I got out when my EAS was up…lol
So yeah. I also voted for Reagan once I am ashamed to say.
Butchie you should be ashamed. Reagan started this whole shitmess. I don’t know what “mainstream progressive values” are. I respect your service in USMC totally. I don’t get though how it’s the most socialist place. I don’t know what EAS is. Lotsa questions…You might explain a little if you feel like it…
I hope she brings in an expert on zoning and other land-use issues to faciltate conversations and bring understanding as both are complicated subjects taking years of work to fully understand. She’s never communicated much knowledge in this arena and Harrell seems to have no problem piling upzone upon upzone onto the Central Area wothout any protest from Hollingsworth.
They have it all planned out already. The put her out front because Joy committed career suicide right away. She is a conservative RINO type yes vote rubber stamped. Everything they have done is the business wish list. It was done fast too. They already have a 2025 plan for Seattle. It’s terrifying to be honest.
It’s so insane how people don’t see how republican Joy is
She shamelessly leans into her culture for votes. Her “Hometown girl done good” story. Hires folks from the community. Then straight out the gate wants $3 an hour from her workers forever. Going completely against what we voted for. Jump Start is the same thing. They vote against it. Then steal the money and claim credit for “all the good things” they are doing. As opposed to finding their OWN REVENUE via voters like Jump Start does.
These people are ruthless sociopaths on the hunt for power and wealth. They use “entryism” to get there. That’s how Trump was elected. 2025 implemented. It’s all entryism tactics and now they own America and quite honestly, the world.
America is now a ruthless empire. Thanks everyone for the 50 years of hard work getting us here! We almost had it.
Last year I watched city council candidate youtube debates and attended a live debate with several city council candidates to get to know them and their positions. Having no previous knowledge, even though she didn’t represent my district it was clear Tammy Morales was the most seasoned and well-versed on complex policy issues. In contrast Tanya Woo was probably the most unprepared candidate I’ve witnessed on a debate stage, and I’m old. My takeaway from this article: I am saddened to learn of Morales’ resignation, and—as has been highly promoted because it seems to be endlessly funded by deep-pocketed interests—the surreal championing by city bureaucrats of such an uninformed and seemingly uninterested candidate as Woo. It speaks for how petty and pathetic Seattle is as it sabotages its big-city ambitions.
Ditto…60 years and Woo is exceptional learner material. A simple rubber stamp.
Many of us are fine with Seattle not ever being a ‘big-city’. You want to live in NYC, move to NYC…. Seattle doesn’t need to be Brooklyn without any of the charm…
Except it’s not fine because there’s a housing crisis
Isn’t that the “I got mine” thing we all hate so much around here?
Actually I don’t understand the reasoning that some people seem to have that they somehow are owed a spot wherever they demand it… geeze, when I moved here there were already tons of neighborhoods out of reach to a new college grad, but I didn’t piss and moan about how awful the people already there were…
Most of them moved in 20-30 years earlier when things were cheaper, shabbier, less desirable. And yeah, the place changed – people fixed things up, opened stores, restaurants, things grew, people started wanting to live there more. They don’t owe anyone because of that..
Do what everyone before you has, find a place you can afford and make it your own, rather than expecting to have it all handed to you immediately.
I suggest you go and have a look at the drug scene at 12th & Jackson to see just how harmful Morales’ inaction has been to that area and its unfortunate residents/businesses.
It is interesting to read the comments on here. In the past anyone who dared criticize the previous CM was immediately accused of being a right wing bootlicker along with being racist and misogynistic. Despite the fact she rarely engaged with the community at any level and choose to focus on her “movement”. Now we have a BIPOC woman serving who actually engages with the community and is trying to represent all her constituents. She is met with ad hominem attacks. I guess things in Seattle can only be racist/misognystic if they don’t agree with your political views.