
(Image: Shotspotter)

Wednesday’s meeting of the African American Advisory Council (Image: CHS)
In the scheme of things, $1 million among $1.6 billion in spending line items is a drop in the bucket. But the debate over Seattle’s possible implementation of gunfire detection technology has become a flashpoint in the city’s attempts to address a surge in gun violence.
The African American Advisory Council, which advises the Seattle Police Department about crime prevention and public safety concerns, held a meeting this week to discuss the benefits of the ShotSpotter technology.
ShotSpotter uses acoustic sensors to detect and locate gunshots through triangulation. The goal of the tech, which has been around for 25 years and a subject in debate in Seattle for over a decade, is to, ostensibly, improve police response times to incidents of gun violence.
“We have put out so much money to all of these different organizations–millions of dollars for gun violence prevention,” said Victoria Beach, chair of the council, who also said that nothing is being done while Black children are dying. “I’m tired of sitting and talking to mothers who weep.”
But critics have questioned opening a beachhead to such surveillance technology on city streets. And cities like San Antonio and Charlotte illustrate a more direct problem — the technology doesn’t seem to work.
Wednesday’s meeting of the SPD-backed community group usually dedicated to neighborhood crimes and public safety around the Central District and South Seattle comes as the Seattle City Council is weighing some 100 amendments to finalize Mayor Bruce Harrell’s 2023 budget proposal with its steps back on Seattle reforms including spending to create a larger SPD and a controversial new plan for how to redirecting funding from the city’s big business tax from COVID-19 recovery, housing, and the Green New Deal to patching up the city’s general fund. Harrell’s plans also call for nearly $40 million for “clean city, trash mitigation, encampment resolution, and RV remediation initiatives.” The City Council must pull off the balancing act in the face of a newly predicted greater downturn in tax revenue that will make additions a battle and cuts more likely.
In the middle of this, the debate over ShotSpotter has reemerged. Continue reading →