Post navigation

Prev: (06/16/20) | Next: (06/17/20)

Seattle City Council looking at $200M alternative to Sawant-Morales Amazon tax

Early designs for the Amazon spheres

With reporting by SCC Insight

Seattle City Council member Teresa Mosqueda has unveiled her own progressive revenue proposal for the city, which is at once both a “light” version of her colleagues’ “Amazon tax” proposal, and also even more explicitly targeted at the online retailing giant.

It has been Seattle’s worst-kept secret that Mosqueda has been shopping around various forms of an alternative to the $500 million payroll tax that council members Kshama Sawant and Tammy Morales introduced earlier this year. Tuesday, Mosqueda called a press conference with representatives from business, labor, and advocacy groups to highlight the efforts she has put into trying to build a consensus around her proposal, which she calls “Jump Start Seattle.

Under the proposal to help the city bridge an estimated $550 million budget shortfall from the COVID-19 crisis, companies with payrolls of $7 million or more would be taxed 0.7% for every employee making over $150,000, and 1.4% for employees making over $500,000. In the near term, the tax would not go into effect until 2021 so Mosqueda’s proposal would borrow from emergency and general funds. Later the tax would be used to replenish the borrowed funds and then provide around $200 million a year for affordable housing, equitable development, and economic support for small businesses. Mosqueda’s office says around 97% of businesses in Seattle would be exempted from the tax.

Mosqueda and the Council’s staff were unable to provide any data about the number of companies who would fall into each category, saying that they worked with the state Employment Security Department but the department could not share detailed company employee and wage data with the city for reasons of confidentiality. But by all appearances the top tier, those companies with payroll above $1 billion, consists of exactly one company: Amazon. So while the exemption for compensation under $150,000 is of great benefit for many companies, the bill singles out Amazon for higher tax rates than any other company. Even though it doesn’t name Amazon, the effect is clear, and it puts the proposal in legal jeopardy by giving the appearance of singling out one company for punitive treatment.

There are a handful of other exemptions in the bill: grocery stores, insurance businesses and agents, motor vehicle fuel merchants and distributors, liquor stores, and other government agencies. Most of these exemptions are required by law. On the other hand, gig workers are included under “employees” for the purposes of the tax; so if any Uber drivers manage to pull in over $150,000 per year in Seattle, Uber will need to pay taxes on their compensation.

The tax would be effective as of January 1, 2021, and would expire on December 31, 2030 — ten years. The expectation is that it would raise $172 million in 2021 and $203 million in 2022, This is a conservative estimate; since the city doesn’t have concrete salary data on Amazon’s employees, it estimated revenues on the assumption that all companies pay the lower-tier rates.

Mosqueda’s 2020 spending plan is focused on expanding the city’s response to the COVID-19 crisis. It dips into the city’s emergency fund and its “rainy day” fund for a total of $86 million, and would spend those dollars on:

  • Small business support: $18 million;
  • homelessness response affordable housing, and mortgage support programs: $36 million;
  • Support for immigrants and refugees, many of whom are ineligible for the existing federal COVID aid programs: $18 million;
  • Food security programs: $14 million.

Mosqueda’s proposed spending plan for 2021 takes the first $86 million of payroll tax revenues and refills the emergency and rainy day funds. The remainder of the 2021 revenues — another $86 million — would be split between continuing COVID-19 relief programs ($17 million) and continuing to provide revenue support for other city programs that existed before the COVID-19 economic and budget meltdown ($65 million).

In 2022 and through 2030, the tax revenues would be split three ways:

  • Construction  and operation of affordable housing and permanent supportive housing: 65%
  • Equitable Development Initiative projects: 10%
  • Support for local businesses and tourism to spur the local economic recovery and provide economic stability for the workforce: 20%

5% of the revenues, about $10 million per year, would be reserved for startup costs and administration.

In addition to a 10-year sunset, the tax bill also acknowledges that there is an ongoing effort to fix the existing regressive tax system at a regional and/or state level. The bill states that if progressive revenues are established at those levels, the Council would intend to repeal this payroll tax.

Response to Mosqueda’s announcement has been mixed. Representatives from Expedia and Ethan Stowell Restaurants, who were invited by Mosqueda to participate in the press conference, were generally positive about the proposal despite their expectations that their companies would be paying the tax. The Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce came out against the proposal:

“Our region is in severe economic shock. We need leaders to focus on an equitable and inclusive economic recovery that gets businesses back open and people back to work. It’s still not clear how long impacts like job losses are going to last, and many businesses in Seattle and throughout our region are not in the same place they were at the start of the year. Policy proposals should reflect that reality. This conversation about public budgets and revenues is bigger than just Seattle and should happen at the state level. A new city tax on businesses at this moment will not help economic recovery.”

Mayor Durkan is apparently non-committal. A spokesperson for the Mayor provided the following statement:

“Mayor Durkan has long supported the need to reform Washington state’s regressive tax system and was one of the leading advocates for a regional progressive payroll tax on businesses that was proposed in Olympia earlier this year. Mayor Durkan also believes an income tax would make our tax system less regressive and could generate several hundreds of millions in new revenue each year.

Understanding many of our residents have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, Seattle will need to lead the way on recovery for our residents and businesses as we face a $300 million budget shortfall and urgent needs in our community. The Mayor will soon be presenting her plan to rebalance the 2020 budget as required to address the loss in revenue. The budget will continue investments in the community with federal and state resources and will include cuts and efficiencies for 2020. Later this year, the Mayor will also present the budget for 2021, which will include new community investments during this historic time.

The Mayor has not yet reviewed the legislation but is committed to working with the state delegation, federal delegation, City Council, and community leaders to identify new, progressive revenue sources to invest directly in our communities.”

Council member Sawant slammed Mosqueda’s plan; in an email to her supporters, she said the proposal “represents a positive response to our demand for big business taxes, though it falls far short of what working people, and especially black and brown communities, need in our deeply unequal city.”

Earlier this month, Sawant renewed her push to put her Tax Amazon proposal on the table again at City Hall. The Sawant-Morales proposal would institute a 1.3% excise tax on “the corporate payrolls of for-profit companies whose payrolls are greater than $7 million annually.” Nonprofits, public employers, and grocery stores would be exempt. The Sawant-led proposal represents a much larger bite out of Amazon’s profits and would raise around $500 million a year for COVID-19 relief, affordable housing, and jobs programs. Sawant and the Tax Amazon group pushing for the new tax, meanwhile, are also working toward a ballot measure.

Mosqueda said that she had spoken with over 100 organizations, but not directly with Amazon, about the proposal. Amazon did not respond to a request for comment.

Mosqueda will discuss her proposal at her Budget Committee meeting Wednesday morning, where the competing proposal from Sawant and Morales is already on the agenda.


$5/MONTH? SUBSCRIBE AND SUPPORT LOCAL NEWS: Support local journalism dedicated to your neighborhood. SUBSCRIBE HERE. Join to become a subscriber at $1/$5/$10 a month to help CHS provide community news with NO PAYWALL. You can also sign up for a one-time annual payment.


Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

6 thoughts on “Seattle City Council looking at $200M alternative to Sawant-Morales Amazon tax” -- All CHS Comments are held for moderation before publishing

  1. So totally reasonable of Mosqueda to not make the tax go into effect until 2021. It gives Amazon and any other big affected employers more time to systematically plan to move their jobs out of Seattle, without having to rush quite as much. How considerate.

      • Of course not. It would just cost them money in the short run that they’ll eventually move and evade in the long run. That’s if they didn’t file for an immediate injunction and try to delay it while they plan their moves. If you seriously believe Amazon will just roll over and take it, you’re nuts. And open the door for every single other jurisdiction in the country to do the same thing? Yeah, I don’t think so. You think the Eastside cities or Tacoma area won’t salivate at the chance to scoop up those jobs? WhyTF wouldn’t they? They’d have to be collectively brain dead not to.

  2. This should be done at the county level, minimum. This is putting the city at huge risk of an easy exodus of jobs across the lake. It’s already begun.

    If Sawant or other members of the Council were competent at coalition-building, they might be able to influence Constantine and other county leaders on this and drive a more meaningful package. It makes good headlines to say crazy crap, but it doesn’t win the necessary people over.

    • Unfortunately for Seattle, the burbs/rest of the county don’t carry the same line of politically thinking as the hardliners in Seattle. A county wide tax would NEVER work. A job exodus is to be expected especially with working form home being so popular.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.